BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26968286)

  • 1. Is laparoscopic pyeloplasty a comparable option to treat Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO)? A comparative study.
    Memon MA; Biyabani SR; Ghirano R; Aziz W; Siddiqui KM
    J Pak Med Assoc; 2016 Mar; 66(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 26968286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.
    Umari P; Lissiani A; Trombetta C; Belgrano E
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 22670313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty in secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction after failed open surgery.
    Basiri A; Behjati S; Zand S; Moghaddam SM
    J Endourol; 2007 Sep; 21(9):1045-51; discussion 1051. PubMed ID: 17941785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Weise ES; Winfield HN
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
    J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty.
    Shapiro EY; Cho JS; Srinivasan A; Seideman CA; Huckabay CP; Andonian S; Lee BR; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
    Urology; 2009 Jan; 73(1):115-8. PubMed ID: 18950836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
    Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
    J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single-center comparison of laparoscopic pyeloplasty, Acucise endopyelotomy, and open pyeloplasty.
    Baldwin DD; Dunbar JA; Wells N; McDougall EM
    J Endourol; 2003 Apr; 17(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12803987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reoperative laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: comparison with open surgery.
    Piaggio LA; Noh PH; González R
    J Urol; 2007 May; 177(5):1878-82. PubMed ID: 17437840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
    Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
    Davenport K; Minervini A; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
    Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. One-port retroperitoneoscopic assisted pyeloplasty versus open dismembered pyeloplasty in young children: preliminary experience.
    Caione P; Lais A; Nappo SG
    J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):2109-15. PubMed ID: 20851429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Small incision combined with laparoscopy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction: comparison with retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Wu JT; Gao ZL; Shi L; Han BM; Men CP; Zhang P; Xia SJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2009 Nov; 122(22):2728-32. PubMed ID: 19951604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robot-assisted pyeloplasty: review of the current literature, technique and outcome.
    Singh I; Hemal AK
    Can J Urol; 2010 Apr; 17(2):5099-108. PubMed ID: 20398449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the worst case scenario: after both failed open repair and endoscopic salvage.
    Levin BM; Herrell SD
    J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):808-12. PubMed ID: 17094759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. McMaster experience with laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
    Hussain A; Whelan P; Piercey K; Kapoor A
    Can J Urol; 2004 Jun; 11(3):2299-302. PubMed ID: 15287998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopy versus dorsal lumbotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair.
    Troxel S; Das S; Helfer E; Nugyen M
    J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1073-6. PubMed ID: 16890693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty in treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction (report of 150 cases).
    Chuanyu S; Guowei X; Ke X; Qiang D; Yuanfang Z
    Urology; 2009 Nov; 74(5):1036-40. PubMed ID: 19660798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
    Zhang X; Li HZ; Ma X; Zheng T; Lang B; Zhang J; Fu B; Xu K; Guo XL
    J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1077-80. PubMed ID: 16890694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty: 4-year experience.
    Lam PN; Wong C; Mulholland TL; Campbell JB; Kropp BP
    J Endourol; 2007 Dec; 21(12):1467-71. PubMed ID: 18186685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.