265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26968692)
1. Agreement Between Proximal Femoral Geometry and Component Design in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Implications for Implant Choice.
Boese CK; Dargel J; Jostmeier J; Eysel P; Frink M; Lechler P
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1842-8. PubMed ID: 26968692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Becker V-shaped lateral rotation osteotomy in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type IV development dislocation of hip].
Li Y; Ma W; Sun J; Song X; An M; Zhang Q
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Sep; 27(9):1032-6. PubMed ID: 24279008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.
Wells J; Nepple JJ; Crook K; Ross JR; Bedi A; Schoenecker P; Clohisy JC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1045-1054. PubMed ID: 27752989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The tridimensional geometry of the proximal femur should determine the design of cementless femoral stem in total hip arthroplasty.
Wegrzyn J; Roux JP; Loriau C; Bonin N; Pibarot V
Int Orthop; 2018 Oct; 42(10):2329-2334. PubMed ID: 29468265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do post-operative changes of neck-shaft angle and femoral component anteversion have an effect on clinical outcome following uncemented total hip arthroplasty?
Müller M; Abdel MP; Wassilew GI; Duda G; Perka C
Bone Joint J; 2015 Dec; 97-B(12):1615-22. PubMed ID: 26637674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Femoral Head Center Shifts in a Mediocaudal Direction During Aging.
Boymans TAEJ; Veldman HD; Noble PC; Heyligers IC; Grimm B
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Feb; 32(2):581-586. PubMed ID: 27546472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The final implant position of a commonly used collarless straight tapered stem design (Corail
Worlicek M; Weber M; Wörner M; Schwarz T; Zeman F; Grifka J; Renkawitz T; Craiovan B
J Orthop Traumatol; 2018 Nov; 19(1):20. PubMed ID: 30426269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Relation between lower extremity alignment and proximal femur anatomy. Parameters during total hip arthroplasty.
Ollivier M; Parratte S; Lecoz L; Flecher X; Argenson JN
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2013 Sep; 99(5):493-500. PubMed ID: 23806349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Usefullness of three-dimensional templating software to quantify the contact state between implant and femur in total hip arthroplasty.
Inoue D; Kabata T; Maeda T; Kajino Y; Fujita K; Hasegawa K; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Ohmori T; Tsuchiya H
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2015 Dec; 25(8):1293-300. PubMed ID: 26538280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of reconstruction of the hip using computerised three-dimensional pre-operative planning and a cementless modular neck.
Sariali E; Mouttet A; Pasquier G; Durante E; Catone Y
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2009 Mar; 91(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 19258608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [CLINICAL RESULTS OF UNCEMENTED TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY FOR ULTIMATE HIP DISEASE COMBINED WITH PROXIMAL FEMORAL DEFORMITY].
You Z; Sun J; Zha G; Wang T; Dong S; Jiang T
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 29(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 26455187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Femoral offset: anatomical concept, definition, assessment, implications for preoperative templating and hip arthroplasty.
Lecerf G; Fessy MH; Philippot R; Massin P; Giraud F; Flecher X; Girard J; Mertl P; Marchetti E; Stindel E
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2009 May; 95(3):210-9. PubMed ID: 19423418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Can Radiographs Predict the Use of Modular Stems in Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip?
Peters CL; Chrastil J; Stoddard GJ; Erickson JA; Anderson MB; Pelt CE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):423-9. PubMed ID: 26183845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of femoral neck osteotomy on femoral component position of a primary cementless total hip arthroplasty.
Dimitriou D; Tsai TY; Kwon YM
Int Orthop; 2015 Dec; 39(12):2315-21. PubMed ID: 25787684
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Noncemented total hip arthroplasty: influence of extramedullary parameters on initial implant stability and on bone-implant interface stresses].
Ramaniraka NA; Rakotomanana LR; Rubin PJ; Leyvraz P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2000 Oct; 86(6):590-7. PubMed ID: 11060433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducing the hip center with a femoral neck-retaining implant.
Mihalko WM; Assaf D; Sungu M
Orthopedics; 2015 Mar; 38(3 Suppl):S21-6. PubMed ID: 25826628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Computed tomography evaluation of hip geometry restoration after total hip resurfacing.
Arnould A; Boureau F; Benad K; Pasquier G; Migaud H; Girard J
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Sep; 101(5):571-5. PubMed ID: 26148967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [COMPARISON OF PROSTHESIS WITH DIFFERENT NECK-SHAFT ANGLES FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF FEMORAL PROXIMAL ANATOMY AFTER TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY].
Zhang G; Yang C; Yang G; Qi X
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Jan; 30(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 27062842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Total hip arthroplasty with double-tapered cementless femoral stem for hip bony].
Zhang Q; Liu M; Chai W; Zhang G; Chen J; Li Z; Dong X; Zhou Y; Wang X; Wang Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Mar; 27(3):278-82. PubMed ID: 23672124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Proximal Femur Bone Density Decreases up to 5 Years After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Young, Active Patients.
Nam D; Barrack RL; Clohisy JC; Nunley RM
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2825-2830. PubMed ID: 27378640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
