These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26968711)

  • 1. A fresh pair of eyes on prospective memory monitoring.
    Shelton JT; Christopher EA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Aug; 44(6):837-45. PubMed ID: 26968711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The strategic control of prospective memory monitoring in response to complex and probabilistic contextual cues.
    Bugg JM; Ball BH
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):755-775. PubMed ID: 28275948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Context cue focality influences strategic prospective memory monitoring.
    Hunter Ball B; Bugg JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Aug; 25(4):1405-1415. PubMed ID: 29435962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The cognitive cost of event-based prospective memory in children.
    Leigh J; Marcovitch S
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Nov; 127():24-35. PubMed ID: 24853249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Dynamic Multiprocess Framework: evidence from prospective memory with contextual variability.
    Scullin MK; McDaniel MA; Shelton JT
    Cogn Psychol; 2013; 67(1-2):55-71. PubMed ID: 23916951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development of prospective memory in young schoolchildren: the impact of ongoing task absorption, cue salience, and cue centrality.
    Kliegel M; Mahy CE; Voigt B; Henry JD; Rendell PG; Aberle I
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Dec; 116(4):792-810. PubMed ID: 24056203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. After-effects without monitoring costs: The impact of prospective memory instructions on task switching performance.
    Meier B; Rey-Mermet A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():85-99. PubMed ID: 28477841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of characteristics of target cues on task interference from prospective memory.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Jackson T; Yang H
    Neuroreport; 2009 Jan; 20(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 18978643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Deficits in cue detection underlie event-based prospective memory impairment in major depression: an eye tracking study.
    Chen S; Zhou R; Cui H; Chen X
    Psychiatry Res; 2013 Oct; 209(3):453-8. PubMed ID: 23477903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prepare for conflict: EEG correlates of the anticipation of target competition during overt and covert shifts of visual attention.
    Kelly SP; Foxe JJ; Newman G; Edelman JA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2010 May; 31(9):1690-700. PubMed ID: 20525082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implementation-intention encoding in a prospective memory task enhances spontaneous retrieval of intentions.
    Rummel J; Einstein GO; Rampey H
    Memory; 2012; 20(8):803-17. PubMed ID: 22897132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Let it go: the flexible engagement and disengagement of monitoring processes in a non-focal prospective memory task.
    Cohen AL; Gordon A; Jaudas A; Hefer C; Dreisbach G
    Psychol Res; 2017 Mar; 81(2):366-377. PubMed ID: 26820461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The location but not the attributes of visual cues are automatically encoded into working memory.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():76-85. PubMed ID: 25490435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does predictability matter? Effects of cue predictability on neurocognitive mechanisms underlying prospective memory.
    Cona G; Arcara G; Tarantino V; Bisiacchi PS
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2015; 9():188. PubMed ID: 25918503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. No effects of executive control depletion on prospective memory retrieval processes.
    Cook C; Ball BH; Brewer GA
    Conscious Cogn; 2014 Jul; 27():121-8. PubMed ID: 24844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distinct effects of trial-driven and task Set-related control in primary visual cortex.
    Griffis JC; Elkhetali AS; Vaden RJ; Visscher KM
    Neuroimage; 2015 Oct; 120():285-297. PubMed ID: 26163806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of age, ongoing task difficulty, and cue salience on preschoolers' prospective memory performance: the role of executive function.
    Mahy CE; Moses LJ; Kliegel M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Nov; 127():52-64. PubMed ID: 24613075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The failure of deactivating intentions: aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm.
    Walser M; Fischer R; Goschke T
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jul; 38(4):1030-44. PubMed ID: 22288817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of executive functions in prospective memory in multiple sclerosis: Impact of the strength of cue-action association.
    Dagenais E; Rouleau I; Tremblay A; Demers M; Roger É; Jobin C; Duquette P
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2016; 38(1):127-40. PubMed ID: 26588195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual differences in episodic memory abilities predict successful prospective memory output monitoring.
    Hunter Ball B; Pitães M; Brewer GA
    Memory; 2018 Sep; 26(8):1159-1168. PubMed ID: 29415613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.