These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26968726)
61. Implications of changes in solids retention time on long term evolution of sludge filterability in anaerobic membrane bioreactors treating high strength industrial wastewater. Dereli RK; Grelot A; Heffernan B; van der Zee FP; van Lier JB Water Res; 2014 Aug; 59():11-22. PubMed ID: 24769102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Using Additives for Fouling Control in a Lab-Scale MBR; Comparing the Anti-Fouling Potential of Coagulants, PAC and Bio-Film Carriers. Gkotsis P; Zouboulis A; Mitrakas M Membranes (Basel); 2020 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 32178462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Characterisation of biofilm constituents and their effect on membrane filterability in MBRs. Ng TC; Ng HY Water Sci Technol; 2008; 58(10):1933-9. PubMed ID: 19039172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. Novel electrokinetic approach reduces membrane fouling. Ibeid S; Elektorowicz M; Oleszkiewicz JA Water Res; 2013 Oct; 47(16):6358-66. PubMed ID: 24011406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. A novel composite conductive microfiltration membrane and its anti-fouling performance with an external electric field in membrane bioreactors. Huang J; Wang Z; Zhang J; Zhang X; Ma J; Wu Z Sci Rep; 2015 Mar; 5():9268. PubMed ID: 25784160 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Comparison between novel vibrating ceramic MBR and conventional air-sparging MBR for domestic wastewater treatment: Performance, fouling control and energy consumption. Wang C; Ng TCA; Ng HY Water Res; 2021 Sep; 203():117521. PubMed ID: 34391023 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Comparison of mixed liquor filterability measured with bench and pilot-scale membrane bioreactors. Nywening JP; Zhou H; Husain H Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(6):155-62. PubMed ID: 17898454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Fouling of membranes in membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment: Planktonic bacteria can have a significant contribution. Hansen SH; Nierychlo M; Christensen ML; Nielsen PH; Jørgensen MK Water Environ Res; 2021 Feb; 93(2):207-216. PubMed ID: 32645226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Evaluating the effect of air flow rate on hybrid and conventional membrane bioreactors: Implications on performance, microbial activity and membrane fouling. Belli TJ; Bassin JP; Costa RE; Akaboci TRV; Battistelli AA; Lobo-Recio MA; Lapolli FR Sci Total Environ; 2021 Feb; 755(Pt 2):142563. PubMed ID: 33059133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Determination on inhibition effects of coagulants used in wastewater treatment plants on anaerobic digester. Demirkol GT; Balcıoğlu G; Öz N; Elnekave M; Armağan B; Tüfekci N Water Sci Technol; 2020 Nov; 82(9):1877-1884. PubMed ID: 33201851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Robust performance of a membrane bioreactor for removing antibiotic resistance genes exposed to antibiotics: Role of membrane foulants. Zhu Y; Wang Y; Zhou S; Jiang X; Ma X; Liu C Water Res; 2018 Mar; 130():139-150. PubMed ID: 29216481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. [Characteristics of nitrogen and phosphorus removal and control of membrane fouling in MBR and SMBR]. Guo XM; Zhao Y; Wang KY; Zhao Yang-Guo Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2015 Mar; 36(3):1013-20. PubMed ID: 25929071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Fouling in membrane bioreactors: An updated review. Meng F; Zhang S; Oh Y; Zhou Z; Shin HS; Chae SR Water Res; 2017 May; 114():151-180. PubMed ID: 28237783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Low dose powdered activated carbon addition at high sludge retention times to reduce fouling in membrane bioreactors. Remy M; van der Marel P; Zwijnenburg A; Rulkens W; Temmink H Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(2):345-50. PubMed ID: 19010512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Interrelated effects of aeration and mixed liquor fractions on membrane fouling for submerged membrane bioreactor processes in wastewater treatment. Fan F; Zhou H Environ Sci Technol; 2007 Apr; 41(7):2523-8. PubMed ID: 17438810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Electroconductive moving bed membrane bioreactor (EcMB-MBR) for single-step decentralized wastewater treatment: Performance, mechanisms, and cost. Udomkittayachai N; Xue W; Xiao K; Visvanathan C; Tabucanon AS Water Res; 2021 Jan; 188():116547. PubMed ID: 33126002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Impact of synthetic or real urban wastewater on membrane bioreactor (MBR) performances and membrane fouling under stable conditions. Villain M; Bourven I; Guibaud G; Marrot B Bioresour Technol; 2014 Mar; 155():235-44. PubMed ID: 24457299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) integrated membrane bioreactor (MBR) for the real textile wastewater treatment. Sathya U; Keerthi ; Nithya M; Balasubramanian N J Environ Manage; 2019 Sep; 246():768-775. PubMed ID: 31228690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Reduced membrane fouling in a novel bio-entrapped membrane reactor for treatment of food and beverage processing wastewater. Ng KK; Lin CF; Panchangam SC; Andy Hong PK; Yang PY Water Res; 2011 Aug; 45(14):4269-78. PubMed ID: 21705038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]