These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26968930)

  • 1. Formulating spread of species with habitat dependent growth and dispersal in heterogeneous landscapes.
    Ramanantoanina A; Hui C
    Math Biosci; 2016 May; 275():51-6. PubMed ID: 26968930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Spreading speeds for plant populations in landscapes with low environmental variation.
    Gilbert MA; Gaffney EA; Bullock JM; White SM
    J Theor Biol; 2014 Dec; 363():436-52. PubMed ID: 25152218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Allee effects and population spread in patchy landscapes.
    Maciel GA; Lutscher F
    J Biol Dyn; 2015; 9():109-23. PubMed ID: 25893974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spreading speeds for stage structured plant populations in fragmented landscapes.
    Gilbert MA; White SM; Bullock JM; Gaffney EA
    J Theor Biol; 2014 May; 349():135-49. PubMed ID: 24486654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Persistence and Spreading Speeds of Integro-Difference Equations with an Expanding or Contracting Habitat.
    Li B; Bewick S; Barnard MR; Fagan WF
    Bull Math Biol; 2016 Jul; 78(7):1337-79. PubMed ID: 27417986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Persistence and spread of stage-structured populations in heterogeneous landscapes.
    Alqawasmeh Y; Lutscher F
    J Math Biol; 2019 Apr; 78(5):1485-1527. PubMed ID: 30603992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Locally dispersing populations in heterogeneous dynamic landscapes with spatiotemporal correlations. I. Block disturbance.
    Hiebeler DE; Houle J; Drummond F; Bilodeau P; Merckens J
    J Theor Biol; 2016 Oct; 407():212-224. PubMed ID: 27460587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anthropogenic landscape change promotes asymmetric dispersal and limits regional patch occupancy in a spatially structured bird population.
    Pavlacky DC; Possingham HP; Lowe AJ; Prentis PJ; Green DJ; Goldizen AW
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 Sep; 81(5):940-52. PubMed ID: 22489927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Species persistence in landscapes with spatial variation in habitat quality: a pair approximation model.
    Liao J; Li Z; Hiebeler DE; Iwasa Y; Bogaert J; Nijs I
    J Theor Biol; 2013 Oct; 335():22-30. PubMed ID: 23792314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Locally dispersing populations in heterogeneous dynamic landscapes with spatiotemporal correlations. II. Habitat driven by voter dynamics.
    Hiebeler DE; Hill JL
    J Theor Biol; 2016 Oct; 407():81-89. PubMed ID: 27457095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Patchy Invasion of Stage-Structured Alien Species with Short-Distance and Long-Distance Dispersal.
    Rodrigues LA; Mistro DC; Cara ER; Petrovskaya N; Petrovskii S
    Bull Math Biol; 2015 Aug; 77(8):1583-619. PubMed ID: 26438447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental evidence that density dependence strongly influences plant invasions through fragmented landscapes.
    Williams JL; Levine JM
    Ecology; 2018 Apr; 99(4):876-884. PubMed ID: 29352466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing the risk of invasive spread in fragmented landscapes.
    With KA
    Risk Anal; 2004 Aug; 24(4):803-15. PubMed ID: 15357801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Metapopulation dynamics on ephemeral patches.
    Reigada C; Schreiber SJ; Altermatt F; Holyoak M
    Am Nat; 2015 Feb; 185(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 25616138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Success, failure, and spreading speeds for invasions on spatial gradients.
    Li B; Fagan WF; Meyer KI
    J Math Biol; 2015 Jan; 70(1-2):265-87. PubMed ID: 24562814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Competing populations on fragmented landscapes with spatially structured heterogeneities: improved landscape generation and mixed dispersal strategies.
    Hiebeler DE
    J Math Biol; 2007 Mar; 54(3):337-56. PubMed ID: 17151885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Density dependence slows invader spread in fragmented landscapes.
    Pachepsky E; Levine JM
    Am Nat; 2011 Jan; 177(1):18-28. PubMed ID: 21117949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dispersal in heterogeneous habitats: thresholds, spatial scales, and approximate rates of spread.
    Dewhirst S; Lutscher F
    Ecology; 2009 May; 90(5):1338-45. PubMed ID: 19537553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transient Propagation of the Invasion Front in the Homogeneous Landscape and in the Presence of a Road.
    Deeley B; Petrovskaya N
    Bull Math Biol; 2024 May; 86(7):78. PubMed ID: 38777934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A toad more traveled: the heterogeneous invasion dynamics of cane toads in Australia.
    Urban MC; Phillips BL; Skelly DK; Shine R
    Am Nat; 2008 Mar; 171(3):E134-48. PubMed ID: 18271722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.