These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26968941)

  • 1. Multi-objective optimization framework to obtain model-based guidelines for tuning biological synthetic devices: an adaptive network case.
    Boada Y; Reynoso-Meza G; Picó J; Vignoni A
    BMC Syst Biol; 2016 Mar; 10():27. PubMed ID: 26968941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Multi-Objective Optimization Tuning Framework for Kinetic Parameter Selection and Estimation.
    Boada Y; Picó J; Vignoni A
    Methods Mol Biol; 2022; 2385():65-89. PubMed ID: 34888716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Design and Evaluation of Synthetic RNA-Based Incoherent Feed-Forward Loop Circuits.
    Hong S; Jeong D; Ryan J; Foo M; Tang X; Kim J
    Biomolecules; 2021 Aug; 11(8):. PubMed ID: 34439849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SBROME: a scalable optimization and module matching framework for automated biosystems design.
    Huynh L; Tsoukalas A; Köppe M; Tagkopoulos I
    ACS Synth Biol; 2013 May; 2(5):263-73. PubMed ID: 23654271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Parts Database with Consensus Parameter Estimation for Synthetic Circuit Design.
    Huynh L; Tagkopoulos I
    ACS Synth Biol; 2016 Dec; 5(12):1412-1420. PubMed ID: 27454439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Tools and Principles for Microbial Gene Circuit Engineering.
    Bradley RW; Buck M; Wang B
    J Mol Biol; 2016 Feb; 428(5 Pt B):862-88. PubMed ID: 26463592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optimally Designed Model Selection for Synthetic Biology.
    Bandiera L; Gomez-Cabeza D; Gilman J; Balsa-Canto E; Menolascina F
    ACS Synth Biol; 2020 Nov; 9(11):3134-3144. PubMed ID: 33152239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accurate predictions of genetic circuit behavior from part characterization and modular composition.
    Davidsohn N; Beal J; Kiani S; Adler A; Yaman F; Li Y; Xie Z; Weiss R
    ACS Synth Biol; 2015 Jun; 4(6):673-81. PubMed ID: 25369267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multidimensional Characterization of Parts Enhances Modeling Accuracy in Genetic Circuits.
    Gómez-Schiavon M; Dods G; El-Samad H; Ng AH
    ACS Synth Biol; 2020 Nov; 9(11):2917-2926. PubMed ID: 33166452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Design of a bistable switch to control cellular uptake.
    Oyarzún DA; Chaves M
    J R Soc Interface; 2015 Dec; 12(113):20150618. PubMed ID: 26674196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. AutoBioCAD: full biodesign automation of genetic circuits.
    Rodrigo G; Jaramillo A
    ACS Synth Biol; 2013 May; 2(5):230-6. PubMed ID: 23654253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An Automated Biomodel Selection System (BMSS) for Gene Circuit Designs.
    Yeoh JW; Ng KBI; Teh AY; Zhang J; Chee WKD; Poh CL
    ACS Synth Biol; 2019 Jul; 8(7):1484-1497. PubMed ID: 31035759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Optimal part and module selection for synthetic gene circuit design automation.
    Huynh L; Tagkopoulos I
    ACS Synth Biol; 2014 Aug; 3(8):556-64. PubMed ID: 24933033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dealing with the genetic load in bacterial synthetic biology circuits: convergences with the Ohm's law.
    Carbonell-Ballestero M; Garcia-Ramallo E; Montañez R; Rodriguez-Caso C; Macía J
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2016 Jan; 44(1):496-507. PubMed ID: 26656950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating the Contribution of Model Complexity in Predicting Robustness in Synthetic Genetic Circuits.
    Buecherl L; Myers CJ; Fontanarrosa P
    ACS Synth Biol; 2024 Sep; 13(9):2742-2752. PubMed ID: 39264040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automated Design of Synthetic Cell Classifier Circuits Using a Two-Step Optimization Strategy.
    Mohammadi P; Beerenwinkel N; Benenson Y
    Cell Syst; 2017 Feb; 4(2):207-218.e14. PubMed ID: 28189580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated Design Framework for Synthetic Biology Exploiting Pareto Optimality.
    Otero-Muras I; Banga JR
    ACS Synth Biol; 2017 Jul; 6(7):1180-1193. PubMed ID: 28350462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SYNBADm: a tool for optimization-based automated design of synthetic gene circuits.
    Otero-Muras I; Henriques D; Banga JR
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Nov; 32(21):3360-3362. PubMed ID: 27402908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Synthetic Biology: A Unifying View and Review Using Analog Circuits.
    Teo JJ; Woo SS; Sarpeshkar R
    IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst; 2015 Aug; 9(4):453-74. PubMed ID: 26372648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Layering genetic circuits to build a single cell, bacterial half adder.
    Wong A; Wang H; Poh CL; Kitney RI
    BMC Biol; 2015 Jun; 13():40. PubMed ID: 26078033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.