These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26969219)

  • 1. Efficacy and Safety of Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Using Remote Magnetic Navigation: Experience from 1,006 Procedures.
    Jin QI; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen XU
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S23-8. PubMed ID: 26969219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Comparison of Remote Magnetic Irrigated Tip Ablation versus Manual Catheter Irrigated Tip Catheter Ablation With and Without Force Sensing Feedback.
    Weiss JP; May HT; Bair TL; Crandall BG; Cutler MJ; Day JD; Osborn JS; Mallender C; Bunch TJ
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S5-S10. PubMed ID: 26969224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safety and Long-Term Outcomes of Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Using Magnetic Navigation versus Manual Conventional Ablation: A Propensity-Score Analysis.
    Adragão PP; Cavaco D; Ferreira AM; Costa FM; Parreira L; Carmo P; Morgado FB; Santos KR; Santos PG; Carvalho MS; Durazzo A; Marques H; Gonçalves PA; Raposo L; Mendes M
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S11-6. PubMed ID: 26969217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation using a new three-dimensional non-fluoroscopic navigation system: a single-centre prospective study.
    Da Costa A; Ben H'dech M; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Bisch L; Gate-Martinet A; Levallois M; Isaaz K
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2013; 106(8-9):423-32. PubMed ID: 23906679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Initial experience of a novel mapping system combined with remote magnetic navigation in the catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Lin C; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen X
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2017 Dec; 28(12):1387-1392. PubMed ID: 28862806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Efficacy and safety of remote magnetic catheter navigation vs. manual steerable sheath-guided ablation for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a case-control study.
    Koutalas E; Bertagnolli L; Sommer P; Richter S; Rolf S; Breithardt O; Bollmann A; Hindricks G; Arya A
    Europace; 2015 Feb; 17(2):232-8. PubMed ID: 25336662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does a patent foramen ovale matter when using a remote-controlled magnetic system for pulmonary vein isolation?
    Gate-Martinet A; Da Costa A; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Bisch L; Levallois M; Isaaz K
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2014 Feb; 107(2):88-95. PubMed ID: 24556188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Feasibility and safety of remote-controlled magnetic navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Katsiyiannis WT; Melby DP; Matelski JL; Ervin VL; Laverence KL; Gornick CC
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Dec; 102(12):1674-6. PubMed ID: 19064022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of a contact force-sensing ablation catheter with advanced catheter location significantly reduces fluoroscopy time and radiation dose in catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Lee G; Hunter RJ; Lovell MJ; Finlay M; Ullah W; Baker V; Dhinoja MB; Sporton S; Earley MJ; Schilling RJ
    Europace; 2016 Feb; 18(2):211-8. PubMed ID: 26318548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of catheter ablation with remote magnetic navigation on procedural outcomes in patients with persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Jin Q; Pehrson S; Jacobsen PK; Chen X
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2015 Nov; 44(2):197-204. PubMed ID: 26216480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. General anesthesia is not superior to local anesthesia for remote magnetic ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Bun SS; Latcu DG; Allouche E; Errahmouni A; Saoudi N
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Mar; 38(3):391-7. PubMed ID: 25353088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term outcomes of the current remote magnetic catheter navigation technique for ablation of atrial fibrillation.
    Yuan S; Holmqvist F; Kongstad O; Jensen SM; Wang L; Ljungström E; Hertervig E; Borgquist R
    Scand Cardiovasc J; 2017 Dec; 51(6):308-315. PubMed ID: 28958165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contact force sensing manual catheter versus remote magnetic navigation ablation of atrial fibrillation: a single-center comparison.
    Schlögl S; Schlögl KS; Bengel P; Haarmann H; Bergau L; Rasenack E; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Heart Vessels; 2024 May; 39(5):427-437. PubMed ID: 38189924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic magnetic navigation-guided catheter ablation establishes highly effective pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation when compared to conventional ablation techniques.
    Noten AME; Romanov A; De Schouwer K; Beloborodov V; Bhagwandien R; Hoogendijk MG; Mikheenko I; Wijchers S; Yap SC; Schwagten B; Szili-Torok T
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2023 Dec; 34(12):2472-2483. PubMed ID: 37767745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. nMARQ Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: Results from a Multicenter Study.
    Mahida S; Hooks DA; Nentwich K; Ng GA; Grimaldi M; Shin DI; Derval N; Sacher F; Berte B; Yamashita S; Denis A; Hocini M; Deneke T; Haissaguerre M; Jais P
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Jul; 26(7):724-9. PubMed ID: 25916682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Remote magnetic versus manual catheter navigation for circumferential pulmonary vein ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation.
    Lüthje L; Vollmann D; Seegers J; Dorenkamp M; Sohns C; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 100(11):1003-11. PubMed ID: 21706198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Remote-controlled magnetic pulmonary vein isolation combined with superior vena cava isolation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized study.
    Da Costa A; Levallois M; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Bisch L; Gate-Martinet A; Isaaz K
    Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2015 Mar; 108(3):163-71. PubMed ID: 25662699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Catheter Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia With Remote Magnetic Navigation: STOP-VT Multicenter Trial.
    Skoda J; Arya A; Garcia F; Gerstenfeld E; Marchlinski F; Hindricks G; Miller J; Petru J; Sediva L; Sha Q; Janotka M; Chovanec M; Waldauf P; Neuzil P; Reddy VY
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2016 Mar; 27 Suppl 1():S29-37. PubMed ID: 26969220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Remote magnetic navigation versus manual catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: A single center long-term comparison.
    Schlögl S; Schlögl KS; Haarmann H; Bengel P; Bergau L; Rasenack E; Hasenfuss G; Zabel M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2022 Jan; 45(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 34687054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prevalence and distribution of focal triggers in persistent and long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation.
    Santangeli P; Zado ES; Hutchinson MD; Riley MP; Lin D; Frankel DS; Supple GE; Garcia FC; Dixit S; Callans DJ; Marchlinski FE
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Feb; 13(2):374-82. PubMed ID: 26477712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.