BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26970107)

  • 1. Empirical extensions of the lasso penalty to reduce the false discovery rate in high-dimensional Cox regression models.
    Ternès N; Rotolo F; Michiels S
    Stat Med; 2016 Jul; 35(15):2561-73. PubMed ID: 26970107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Application of statistical machine learning in biomarker selection.
    Vashistha R; Noor Z; Dasgupta S; Pu J; Deng S
    Sci Rep; 2023 Oct; 13(1):18331. PubMed ID: 37884606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A neutral comparison of algorithms to minimize L
    Frommlet F
    Biom J; 2024 Jan; 66(1):e2200207. PubMed ID: 37421205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical analysis of air quality dataset of Kathmandu, Nepal, with a New Extended Kumaraswamy Exponential Distribution.
    Chaudhary AK; Telee LBS; Karki M; Kumar V
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2024 Mar; 31(14):21073-21088. PubMed ID: 38381289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Weibull regression with Bayesian variable selection to identify prognostic tumour markers of breast cancer survival.
    Newcombe PJ; Raza Ali H; Blows FM; Provenzano E; Pharoah PD; Caldas C; Richardson S
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):414-436. PubMed ID: 25193065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simultaneous variable selection and estimation for survival data via the Gaussian seamless-
    Liu Z; Wang H
    Stat Med; 2024 Apr; 43(8):1509-1526. PubMed ID: 38320545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using information criteria to select smoothing parameters when analyzing survival data with time-varying coefficient hazard models.
    Luo L; He K; Wu W; Taylor JM
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2023 Sep; 32(9):1664-1679. PubMed ID: 37408385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Learning mixed graphical models with separate sparsity parameters and stability-based model selection.
    Sedgewick AJ; Shi I; Donovan RM; Benos PV
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 17 Suppl 5(Suppl 5):175. PubMed ID: 27294886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High Dimensional Variable Selection with Error Control.
    Kim S; Halabi S
    Biomed Res Int; 2016; 2016():8209453. PubMed ID: 27597974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessing the practical differences between model selection methods in inferences about choice response time tasks.
    Evans NJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Aug; 26(4):1070-1098. PubMed ID: 30783896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effective sample size in Bayesian information criterion for level-specific fixed and random-effect selection in a two-level nested model.
    Cho SJ; Wu H; Naveiras M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2024 May; 77(2):289-315. PubMed ID: 38591555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. StabJGL: a stability approach to sparsity and similarity selection in multiple-network reconstruction.
    Lingjærde C; Richardson S
    Bioinform Adv; 2023; 3(1):vbad185. PubMed ID: 38152341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Penalized Empirical Likelihood for the Sparse Cox Regression Model.
    Wang D; Wu TT; Zhao Y
    J Stat Plan Inference; 2019 Jul; 201():71-85. PubMed ID: 31588162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variable selection in linear-circular regression models.
    Camli O; Kalaylioglu Z; SenGupta A
    J Appl Stat; 2023; 50(16):3337-3361. PubMed ID: 37969893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Selection of effects in Cox frailty models by regularization methods.
    Groll A; Hastie T; Tutz G
    Biometrics; 2017 Sep; 73(3):846-856. PubMed ID: 28085181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controlling false discoveries in high-dimensional situations: boosting with stability selection.
    Hofner B; Boccuto L; Göker M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 May; 16():144. PubMed ID: 25943565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the Robustness of Variable Selection and Predictive Performance of Regularized Generalized Linear Models and Cox Proportional Hazard Models.
    Hong F; Tian L; Devanarayan V
    Mathematics (Basel); 2023 Feb; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 37990696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Variable screening methods in spatial infectious disease transmission models.
    Akter T; Deardon R
    Spat Spatiotemporal Epidemiol; 2023 Nov; 47():100622. PubMed ID: 38042533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hierarchical False Discovery Rate Control for High-dimensional Survival Analysis with Interactions.
    Liang W; Zhang Q; Ma S
    Comput Stat Data Anal; 2024 Apr; 192():. PubMed ID: 38098875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bayesian Hyper-LASSO Classification for Feature Selection with Application to Endometrial Cancer RNA-seq Data.
    Jiang L; Greenwood CMT; Yao W; Li L
    Sci Rep; 2020 Jun; 10(1):9747. PubMed ID: 32546735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.