These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26970350)

  • 41. Social desirability and self-reports of mood: a rejoinder.
    Gorman BS; Wessman AE; Ricks DF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1975 Feb; 40(1):272-4. PubMed ID: 1118272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Eysenck personality inventory: impulsivity/neuroticism and social desirability response set.
    Kumari V
    Psychol Rep; 1996 Feb; 78(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 8839293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The impact of social desirability on psychometric measures of aggression.
    Vigil-Colet A; Ruiz-Pamies M; Anguiano-Carrasco C; Lorenzo-Seva U
    Psicothema; 2012 May; 24(2):310-5. PubMed ID: 22420362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. A note on socially desirable responding.
    Tracey TJ
    J Couns Psychol; 2016 Mar; 63(2):224-32. PubMed ID: 26689626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Rethinking trait conceptions of social desirability scales: impression management as an expression of honesty-humility.
    de Vries RE; Zettler I; Hilbig BE
    Assessment; 2014 Jun; 21(3):286-99. PubMed ID: 24072594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Development and validation of a self-report measure of emotional intelligence as a multidimensional trait domain.
    Tett RP; Fox KE; Wang A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jul; 31(7):859-88. PubMed ID: 15951360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. You can be too thin (but not too tall): Social desirability bias in self-reports of weight and height.
    Burke MA; Carman KG
    Econ Hum Biol; 2017 Nov; 27(Pt A):198-222. PubMed ID: 28768226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. No evidence that social desirability response set explains the general factor of personality and its affective correlates.
    Rushton JP; Erdle S
    Twin Res Hum Genet; 2010 Apr; 13(2):131-4. PubMed ID: 20397743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Social Desirability in Environmental Psychology Research: Three Meta-Analyses.
    Vesely S; Klöckner CA
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1395. PubMed ID: 32793022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR): a factor analysis.
    Li F; Li Y
    Psychol Rep; 2008 Dec; 103(3):727-31. PubMed ID: 19320206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Toward the development of a new self-report alexithymia scale.
    Taylor GJ; Ryan D; Bagby RM
    Psychother Psychosom; 1985; 44(4):191-9. PubMed ID: 3837277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Socially desirable responding in Chinese university students: denial and enhancement?
    Li F; Li Y; Wang Y
    Psychol Rep; 2015 Apr; 116(2):409-21. PubMed ID: 25730746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A Social Desirability Item Response Theory Model: Retrieve-Deceive-Transfer.
    Leng CH; Huang HY; Yao G
    Psychometrika; 2020 Mar; 85(1):56-74. PubMed ID: 31677045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Patterns of socially desirable responding among perpetrators and victims of wife assault.
    Dutton DG; Hemphill KJ
    Violence Vict; 1992; 7(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 1504031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Regarding some short forms of the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale.
    Strahan RF
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Apr; 100(2):483-8. PubMed ID: 17564223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Social desirability and the relative validities of achieveent scales.
    HEILBRUN AB
    J Consult Psychol; 1962 Aug; 26():383-6. PubMed ID: 13905999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Well-being scales do not measure social desirability.
    McCrae RR
    J Gerontol; 1986 May; 41(3):390-2. PubMed ID: 3700990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. I-DAQ: a new test to assess direct and indirect aggression free of response bias.
    Ruiz-Pamies M; Lorenzo-Seva U; Morales-Vives F; Cosi S; Vigil-Colet A
    Span J Psychol; 2014; 17():E41. PubMed ID: 25011484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Social desirability factors and the Eysenck Personality Inventory.
    Gorman BS
    J Psychol; 1968 May; 69(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 4385349
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Positive response distortion by police officer applicants: association of Paulhus Deception Scales With MMPI-2 and Inwald Personality Inventory Validity Scales.
    Detrick P; Chibnall JT
    Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 18258735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.