These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26970353)
1. Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography. Vinayagam D; Patey O; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 26970353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy and precision of the ultrasound cardiac output monitor (USCOM 1A) in pregnancy: comparison with three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography. McNamara H; Barclay P; Sharma V Br J Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 113(4):669-76. PubMed ID: 25005720 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-Invasive Haemodynamic Monitoring in Pregnancy: A Comparative Study Using Ultrasound and Bioreactance. Vinayagam D; Bowe S; Sheehan E; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A Fetal Diagn Ther; 2017; 41(4):273-282. PubMed ID: 27705969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation of a noninvasive cardiac output monitor in maternal cardiac disease: comparison of NICOM and transthoracic echocardiogram. Florio KL; Williams EM; White D; Daming T; Hostetter S; Schrufer-Poland T; Gray R; Schmidt L; Grodzinsky A; Lee J; Rader V; Swearingen K; Nelson L; Patel N; Magalski A; Gosch K; Jones P; Fu Z; Spertus JA Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Mar; 6(3):101312. PubMed ID: 38342307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of maternal characteristics and gestational age on hemodynamic indices: NICOM device-specific reference ranges. Perry H; Stirrup O; Gutierrez J; Vinayagam D; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 54(5):670-675. PubMed ID: 30548496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical validation of bioreactance for the measurement of cardiac output in pregnancy. Ling HZ; Gallardo-Arozena M; Company-Calabuig AM; Nicolaides KH; Kametas NA Anaesthesia; 2020 Oct; 75(10):1307-1313. PubMed ID: 32469423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of head up tilting on bioreactance cardiac output and stroke volume readings using suprasternal transcutaneous Doppler as a control in healthy young adults. Zhang J; Critchley LA; Lee DC; Khaw KS; Lee SW J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):519-26. PubMed ID: 26873749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cardiac index measurements by transcutaneous Doppler ultrasound and transthoracic echocardiography in adult and pediatric emergency patients. Nguyen HB; Banta DP; Stewart G; Kim T; Bansal R; Anholm J; Wittlake WA; Corbett SW J Clin Monit Comput; 2010 Jun; 24(3):237-47. PubMed ID: 20563629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and precision of USCOM versus transthoracic echocardiography before and during pregnancy. Mulder E; Basit S; Oben J; van Kuijk S; Ghossein-Doha C; Spaanderman M Pregnancy Hypertens; 2019 Jul; 17():138-143. PubMed ID: 31487631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Major Upper Abdominal Surgery Alters the Calibration of Bioreactance Cardiac Output Readings, the NICOM, When Comparisons Are Made Against Suprasternal and Esophageal Doppler Intraoperatively. Huang L; Critchley LAH; Zhang J Anesth Analg; 2015 Oct; 121(4):936-945. PubMed ID: 26218863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Maternal hemodynamics in normal pregnancy: reference ranges and role of maternal characteristics. Vinayagam D; Thilaganathan B; Stirrup O; Mantovani E; Khalil A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 May; 51(5):665-671. PubMed ID: 28437601 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiac output measurements during high-risk Cesarean section using electrical bioreactance or arterial waveform analysis: assessment of agreement. Gutierrez J; Perry H; Columb M; Bampoe S; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Aug; 54(2):232-238. PubMed ID: 30302868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stroke Volume Measurements by Echocardiography and Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor in Children: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study. Fremuth J; Huml M; Pomahacova T; Kobr J; Kormunda S; Sykora J Pediatr Emerg Care; 2023 Sep; 39(9):680-684. PubMed ID: 37478016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of noninvasive bioreactance with oesophageal Doppler estimation of stroke volume during open abdominal surgery: an observational study. Conway DH; Hussain OA; Gall I Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Aug; 30(8):501-8. PubMed ID: 23549128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of bioreactance and echocardiographic non-invasive cardiac output monitoring and myocardial function assessment in primagravida women. Doherty A; El-Khuffash A; Monteith C; McSweeney L; Breatnach C; Kent E; Tully E; Malone F; Thornton P Br J Anaesth; 2017 Apr; 118(4):527-532. PubMed ID: 28403411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of continous-wave Doppler ultrasound monitor and echocardiography to assess cardiac output in intensive care patients. Elgendy A; Seppelt IM; Lane AS Crit Care Resusc; 2017 Sep; 19(3):222-229. PubMed ID: 28866972 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of fluid responsiveness using a non-invasive cardiac output monitor in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Lee JH; No HJ; Song IK; Kim HS; Kim CS; Kim JT Br J Anaesth; 2015 Jul; 115(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 25926311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cardiac Output Measurement Using the Ultrasonic Cardiac Output Monitor: A Validation Study in Newborn Infants. Fraga MV; Dysart KC; Rintoul N; Chaudhary AS; Ratcliffe SJ; Fedec A; Kren S; Cohen MS; Kirpalani H Neonatology; 2019; 116(3):260-268. PubMed ID: 31326967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]