163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26970645)
1. The Last 50 Years: Mismeasurement and Mismanagement Are Impeding Scientific Research.
Lawrence PA
Curr Top Dev Biol; 2016; 116():617-31. PubMed ID: 26970645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The performance of China's biomedical innovation: a scientometric analysis.
Tang X; Du J
Sci China Life Sci; 2016 Oct; 59(10):1074-1082. PubMed ID: 27437700
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Improvement of research and biomedical publication.
Aziz KA; Sallam T; Ibrahim AH; Sufian T
Saudi Med J; 2004 Oct; 25(10):1319-22. PubMed ID: 15494794
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Enhancing biomedical research in Saudi Arabia.
Alfaleh K; Bajammal S
Saudi Med J; 2005 May; 26(5):897; author reply 897-8. PubMed ID: 15951898
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific impact and the quest for visibility.
Madsen RR
FEBS J; 2019 Oct; 286(20):3968-3974. PubMed ID: 31468701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct. Japan's universities take action.
Normile D
Science; 2007 Jan; 315(5808):26. PubMed ID: 17204614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reply to Albers: Acceptance of empirical evidence for gender disparities in Dutch research funding.
van der Lee R; Ellemers N
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Dec; 112(50):E6830. PubMed ID: 26635231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. No evidence that gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands: A reaction to van der Lee and Ellemers.
Volker B; Steenbeek W
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Dec; 112(51):E7036-7. PubMed ID: 26647179
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. How should research productivity be assessed in early career psychiatric researchers? research funding versus scientific productivity.
de Leon J
J Clin Psychiatry; 2009 Sep; 70(9):1327-8; author reply 1328. PubMed ID: 19818260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Gender contributes to personal research funding success in The Netherlands.
van der Lee R; Ellemers N
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Oct; 112(40):12349-53. PubMed ID: 26392544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reply to Volker and Steenbeek: Multiple indicators point toward gender disparities in grant funding success in The Netherlands.
van der Lee R; Ellemers N
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Dec; 112(51):E7038. PubMed ID: 26647178
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dutch research funding, gender bias, and Simpson's paradox.
Albers CJ
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Dec; 112(50):E6828-9. PubMed ID: 26635232
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Scientific approaches to science policy.
Berg JM
Mol Biol Cell; 2013 Nov; 24(21):3273-4. PubMed ID: 24174459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Publishing affects funding in neurology.
Gilhus NE; Sivertsen G
Eur J Neurol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):147-51. PubMed ID: 19765056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Defending Biomedical Science in an Era of Threatened Funding.
Ioannidis JPA
JAMA; 2017 Jun; 317(24):2483-2484. PubMed ID: 28459974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The scientist citizen: time to become political.
Nat Cell Biol; 2017 Mar; 19(3):145. PubMed ID: 28248304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The importance of being earnest: the role of industry employees in studies about their products.
Saper CB
Ann Neurol; 2014 Jun; 75(6):803-4. PubMed ID: 24942598
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Repetitive, duplicate, and redundant publications: a review for authors and readers.
Johnson C
J Manipulative Physiol Ther; 2006 Sep; 29(7):505-9. PubMed ID: 16949937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The illusion of scientific objectivity and the death of the investigator.
Richardson ET; Polyakova A
Eur J Clin Invest; 2012 Feb; 42(2):213-5. PubMed ID: 21752023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Choosing experiments to accelerate collective discovery.
Rzhetsky A; Foster JG; Foster IT; Evans JA
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2015 Nov; 112(47):14569-74. PubMed ID: 26554009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
