These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26971098)

  • 1. Ocular response analyser measurements and central corneal thickness in ocular rosacea patients.
    Palamar M; Degirmenci C; Ertam I; Yagci A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2017 Feb; 37(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 26971098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S; Pandav SS; Banger A; Aggarwal K; Gupta A
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intraocular pressure and biomechanical corneal properties measure by ocular response analyser in patients with primary congenital glaucoma.
    Perucho-González L; Martínez de la Casa JM; Morales-Fernández L; Bañeros-Rojas P; Saenz-Francés F; García-Feijoó J
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 Aug; 94(5):e293-7. PubMed ID: 26647905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Corneal biomechanical properties and intraocular pressure measurement in patients with nanophthalmos.
    Altan C; Kara N; Baz O; Satana B; Demirok A; Yilmaz OF
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2012 Jun; 96(6):806-10. PubMed ID: 22399691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [The corneal biomechanical properties of patients with Graves' orbitopathy].
    Zhang Y; She XX; Yu XJ; Chen LF; Shen LJ
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 52(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 27094063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Corneal Biomechanical Characteristics in Patıents with Behçet Disease.
    Cankaya C; Kalayci BN
    Semin Ophthalmol; 2016; 31(5):439-45. PubMed ID: 25392262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Topographic and biomechanical evaluation of cornea in patients with acromegaly.
    Altinkaynak H; Duru N; Ersoy R; Kalkan Akcay E; Ugurlu N; Cagil N; Cakir B
    Cornea; 2015 Jan; 34(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 25379870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Topographic and biomechanical evaluation of corneas in patients with ocular rosacea.
    Yildirim Y; Olcucu O; Agca A; Karakucuk Y; Alagoz N; Mutaf C; Demirok A; Kutlubay Z
    Cornea; 2015 Mar; 34(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 25611397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Evaluation of the Ocular Response Analyzer in ocular hypertension, glaucoma, and normal populations. Prospective study on 329 eyes].
    Streho M; Dariel R; Giraud JM; Verret C; Fenolland JR; Crochelet O; May F; Maurin JF; Renard JP
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2008 Dec; 31(10):953-60. PubMed ID: 19107070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties using an ocular response analyser to examine aphakic and pseudophakic patients after congenital cataract surgery.
    Simsek T; Soba DO; Tırhış MH; Yılmazbaş P; Öztürk F
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2016 May; 94(3):e198-203. PubMed ID: 26521752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy.
    Iordanidou V; Hamard P; Gendron G; Labbé A; Raphael M; Baudouin C
    J Glaucoma; 2010; 19(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19661821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties in glaucoma and control patients by dynamic Scheimpflug corneal imaging technology].
    Coste V; Schweitzer C; Paya C; Touboul D; Korobelnik JF
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2015 Jun; 38(6):504-13. PubMed ID: 25976131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between novel intraocular pressure measurement from Corvis ST and central corneal thickness and corneal hysteresis.
    Matsuura M; Murata H; Fujino Y; Yanagisawa M; Nakao Y; Tokumo K; Nakakura S; Kiuchi Y; Asaoka R
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 104(4):563-568. PubMed ID: 31362932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of ocular pulse amplitude on ocular response analyzer measurements.
    Xu G; Lam DS; Leung CK
    J Glaucoma; 2011 Aug; 20(6):344-9. PubMed ID: 20852442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of corneal biomechanical properties on rebound tonometer in patients with normal-tension glaucoma.
    Shin J; Lee JW; Kim EA; Caprioli J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 159(1):144-54. PubMed ID: 25308786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic Efficacy of Normalization of Corneal Deformation Variables by the Intraocular Pressure in Glaucomatous Eyes.
    Tejwani S; Devi S; Dinakaran S; Shetty R; Meshram P; Francis M; Sinha Roy A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 57(3):1082-6. PubMed ID: 26968738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma.
    Hirneiss C; Neubauer AS; Yu A; Kampik A; Kernt M
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of corneal biomechanical properties with the Reichert Ocular Response Analyzer.
    Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Pourjavan S
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2011; 21(2):138-48. PubMed ID: 20853262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of Corneal Biomechanical Properties in Patients With Thyroid Eye Disease Using Ocular Response Analyzer.
    Moghimi S; Safizadeh M; Mazloumi M; Hosseini H; Vahedian Z; Rajabi MT
    J Glaucoma; 2016 Mar; 25(3):269-73. PubMed ID: 26020688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Surgically induced changes in corneal viscoelastic properties after 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy using ocular response analyzer.
    Seymenoğlu G; Uzun Ö; Başer E
    Curr Eye Res; 2013 Jan; 38(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 22799272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.