BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26971190)

  • 1. Comparison of prostate cancer detection at 3-T MRI with and without an endorectal coil: A prospective, paired-patient study.
    Costa DN; Yuan Q; Xi Y; Rofsky NM; Lenkinski RE; Lotan Y; Roehrborn CG; Francis F; Travalini D; Pedrosa I
    Urol Oncol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):255.e7-255.e13. PubMed ID: 26971190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. T2- and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging at 3T for the detection of prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil: An intraindividual comparison of image quality and diagnostic performance.
    Baur AD; Daqqaq T; Wagner M; Maxeiner A; Huppertz A; Renz D; Hamm B; Fischer T; Durmus T
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1075-84. PubMed ID: 27161055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prostate MRI using a rigid two-channel phased-array endorectal coil: comparison with phased array coil acquisition at 3 T.
    Lewis S; Ganti A; Argiriadi P; Rosen A; Hectors S; Semaan S; Song C; Peti S; Segall M; George K; Jaikaran V; Villa S; Kestenbaum D; Voutsinas N; Doucette J; Tewari A; Rastinehad AR; Taouli B
    Cancer Imaging; 2022 Mar; 22(1):15. PubMed ID: 35296357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRI of the Prostate With and Without Endorectal Coil at 3 T: Correlation With Whole-Mount Histopathologic Gleason Score.
    Dhatt R; Choy S; Co SJ; Ischia J; Kozlowski P; Harris AC; Jones EC; Black PC; Goldenberg SL; Chang SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jul; 215(1):133-141. PubMed ID: 32160050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
    Boesen L
    Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement.
    Mazaheri Y; Vargas HA; Nyman G; Shukla-Dave A; Akin O; Hricak H
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):e515-20. PubMed ID: 23810189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal-pelvic phased-array coils. Local staging accuracy of prostate cancer using endorectal coil MR imaging.
    Fütterer JJ; Engelbrecht MR; Jager GJ; Hartman RP; King BF; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Eur Radiol; 2007 Apr; 17(4):1055-65. PubMed ID: 17024497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is endorectal coil necessary for the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer? Comparison of non-endorectal versus endorectal MR imaging.
    Lee SH; Park KK; Choi KH; Lim BJ; Kim JH; Lee SW; Chung BH
    World J Urol; 2010 Dec; 28(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 20623288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. MRI of prostate cancer at 1.5 and 3.0 T: comparison of image quality in tumor detection and staging.
    Beyersdorff D; Taymoorian K; Knösel T; Schnorr D; Felix R; Hamm B; Bruhn H
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2005 Nov; 185(5):1214-20. PubMed ID: 16247137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical comparison between a currently available single-loop and an investigational dual-channel endorectal receive coil for prostate magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study at 1.5 and 3 T.
    Vos EK; Sambandamurthy S; Kamel M; McKenney R; van Uden MJ; Hoeks CM; Yakar D; Scheenen TW; Fütterer JJ
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 24019020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance.
    Heijmink SW; Fütterer JJ; Hambrock T; Takahashi S; Scheenen TW; Huisman HJ; Hulsbergen-Van de Kaa CA; Knipscheer BC; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
    Radiology; 2007 Jul; 244(1):184-95. PubMed ID: 17495178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prostate MRI using an external phased array wearable pelvic coil at 3T: comparison with an endorectal coil.
    O'Donohoe RL; Dunne RM; Kimbrell V; Tempany CM
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2019 Mar; 44(3):1062-1069. PubMed ID: 30324501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Detection of Local Recurrence of Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy Using Endorectal Coil MRI at 3 T: Addition of DWI and Dynamic Contrast Enhancement to T2-Weighted MRI.
    Kitajima K; Hartman RP; Froemming AT; Hagen CE; Takahashi N; Kawashima A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Oct; 205(4):807-16. PubMed ID: 26397329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Magnetic resonance imaging of prostate cancer: comparison of image quality using endorectal and pelvic phased array coils.
    Husband JE; Padhani AR; MacVicar AD; Revell P
    Clin Radiol; 1998 Sep; 53(9):673-81. PubMed ID: 9766721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of an endorectal coil for 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy of the prostate at 3.0T in comparison to 1.5T: Do we need an endorectal coil?
    Hoffner MK; Huebner F; Scholtz JE; Zangos S; Schulz B; Luboldt W; Vogl TJ; Bodelle B
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Aug; 85(8):1432-8. PubMed ID: 27423684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Head-to-head comparison of prostate MRI using an endorectal coil versus a non-endorectal coil: meta-analysis of diagnostic performance in staging T3 prostate cancer.
    Tirumani SH; Suh CH; Kim KW; Shinagare AB; Ramaiya NH; Fennessy FM
    Clin Radiol; 2020 Feb; 75(2):157.e9-157.e19. PubMed ID: 31711637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of pelvic phased-array versus endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging at 3 Tesla for local staging of prostate cancer.
    Kim BS; Kim TH; Kwon TG; Yoo ES
    Yonsei Med J; 2012 May; 53(3):550-6. PubMed ID: 22476999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
    Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
    J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [MRI of prostate cancer using three different coil systems: image quality, tumor detection, and staging].
    Beyersdorff D; Darsow U; Stephan C; Schnorr D; Loening S; Taupitz M
    Rofo; 2003 Jun; 175(6):799-805. PubMed ID: 12811693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of image quality and patient discomfort in prostate MRI: pelvic phased array coil vs. endorectal coil.
    Barth BK; Cornelius A; Nanz D; Eberli D; Donati OF
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2016 Nov; 41(11):2218-2226. PubMed ID: 27369051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.