These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26971328)

  • 1. Error Rates, Decisive Outcomes and Publication Bias with Several Inferential Methods.
    Hopkins WG; Batterham AM
    Sports Med; 2016 Oct; 46(10):1563-73. PubMed ID: 26971328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Problem with "Magnitude-based Inference".
    Sainani KL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2018 Oct; 50(10):2166-2176. PubMed ID: 29683920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Systematic review of the use of "magnitude-based inference" in sports science and medicine.
    Lohse KR; Sainani KL; Taylor JA; Butson ML; Knight EJ; Vickers AJ
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0235318. PubMed ID: 32589653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimation versus falsification approaches in sport and exercise science.
    Wilkinson M; Winter EM
    J Sports Sci; 2019 Jan; 37(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 29786469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The continuing misuse of null hypothesis significance testing in biological anthropology.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 May; 166(1):236-245. PubMed ID: 29345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Decision qualities of Bayes factor and p value-based hypothesis testing.
    Jeon M; De Boeck P
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Jun; 22(2):340-360. PubMed ID: 28594227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bayesian alternatives for common null-hypothesis significance tests in psychiatry: a non-technical guide using JASP.
    Quintana DS; Williams DR
    BMC Psychiatry; 2018 Jun; 18(1):178. PubMed ID: 29879931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Numbers Will Love You Back in Return-I Promise.
    Buchheit M
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2016 May; 11(4):551-4. PubMed ID: 27164726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are most published research findings false in a continuous universe?
    Neves K; Tan PB; Amaral OB
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(12):e0277935. PubMed ID: 36538521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes.
    Batterham AM; Hopkins WG
    Int J Sports Physiol Perform; 2006 Mar; 1(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 19114737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current controversies: Null hypothesis significance testing.
    Sedgwick PM; Hammer A; Kesmodel US; Pedersen LH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2022 Jun; 101(6):624-627. PubMed ID: 35451497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinguishing between statistical significance and practical/clinical meaningfulness using statistical inference.
    Wilkinson M
    Sports Med; 2014 Mar; 44(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 24248505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating statistical difference, equivalence, and indeterminacy using inferential confidence intervals: an integrated alternative method of conducting null hypothesis statistical tests.
    Tryon WW
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):371-86. PubMed ID: 11778678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. P > .05: The incorrect interpretation of "not significant" results is a significant problem.
    Smith RJ
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2020 Aug; 172(4):521-527. PubMed ID: 32570289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing for funnel plot asymmetry of standardized mean differences.
    Pustejovsky JE; Rodgers MA
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Mar; 10(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 30506832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A logical analysis of null hypothesis significance testing using popular terminology.
    McNulty R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):244. PubMed ID: 36123631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology.
    Yang Y; Sánchez-Tójar A; O'Dea RE; Noble DWA; Koricheva J; Jennions MD; Parker TH; Lagisz M; Nakagawa S
    BMC Biol; 2023 Apr; 21(1):71. PubMed ID: 37013585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Significance, Errors, Power, and Sample Size: The Blocking and Tackling of Statistics.
    Mascha EJ; Vetter TR
    Anesth Analg; 2018 Feb; 126(2):691-698. PubMed ID: 29346210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Magnitude-based inference": a statistical review.
    Welsh AH; Knight EJ
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Apr; 47(4):874-84. PubMed ID: 25051387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In support of null hypothesis significance testing.
    Mogie M
    Proc Biol Sci; 2004 Feb; 271 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S82-4. PubMed ID: 15101426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.