These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26971476)

  • 1. Attention demands of language production in adults who stutter.
    Maxfield ND; Olsen WL; Kleinman D; Frisch SA; Ferreira VS; Lister JJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Apr; 127(4):1942-60. PubMed ID: 26971476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Real-time processing in picture naming in adults who stutter: ERP evidence.
    Maxfield ND; Morris K; Frisch SA; Morphew K; Constantine JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Feb; 126(2):284-96. PubMed ID: 24910149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Inhibitory Control of Lexical Selection in Adults who Stutter.
    Maxfield ND
    J Fluency Disord; 2020 Dec; 66():105780. PubMed ID: 32950028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Neural correlates of semantic activation spreading on the path to picture naming in adults who stutter.
    Maxfield ND; Huffman JL; Frisch SA; Hinckley JJ
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2010 Sep; 121(9):1447-1463. PubMed ID: 20382559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring semantic and phonological picture-word priming in adults who stutter using event-related potentials.
    Maxfield ND; Pizon-Moore AA; Frisch SA; Constantine JL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 Jun; 123(6):1131-46. PubMed ID: 22055837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effects of concurrent cognitive load on phonological processing in adults who stutter.
    Jones RM; Fox RA; Jacewicz E
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Dec; 55(6):1862-75. PubMed ID: 22562825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Semantic and Phonological Encoding Times in Adults Who Stutter: Brain Electrophysiological Evidence.
    Maxfield ND
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 60(10):2906-2923. PubMed ID: 28973156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):147-65. PubMed ID: 23895445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Non-linguistic auditory processing in stuttering: evidence from behavior and event-related brain potentials.
    Hampton A; Weber-Fox C
    J Fluency Disord; 2008 Dec; 33(4):253-73. PubMed ID: 19328979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Semantic interference in picture naming during dual-task performance does not vary with reading ability.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Roete I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1758-68. PubMed ID: 25397667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dual-tasking with simple linguistic tasks: Evidence for serial processing.
    Fairs A; Bögels S; Meyer AS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Nov; 191():131-148. PubMed ID: 30268022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distractor P3 is associated with attentional capture by stimulus deviance.
    Sawaki R; Katayama J
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 119(6):1300-9. PubMed ID: 18411071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of selected lexical factors on confrontation naming accuracy, speed, and fluency in adults who do and do not stutter.
    Newman RS; Bernstein Ratner N
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Feb; 50(1):196-213. PubMed ID: 17344559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Involvement of the Central Cognitive Mechanism in Word Production in Adults Who Stutter.
    Tsai PT; Ratner NB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Dec; 59(6):1269-1282. PubMed ID: 27930777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological evidence of multitasking impairment of attentional deployment reflects target-specific processing, not distractor inhibition.
    Corriveau I; Fortier-Gauthier U; Pomerleau VJ; McDonald J; Dell'acqua R; Jolicoeur P
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Nov; 86(2):152-9. PubMed ID: 22732349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Emotionally negative pictures increase attention to a subsequent auditory stimulus.
    Tartar JL; de Almeida K; McIntosh RC; Rosselli M; Nash AJ
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2012 Jan; 83(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 22015918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Use of a phoneme monitoring task to examine lexical access in adults who do and do not stutter.
    Howell TA; Bernstein Ratner N
    J Fluency Disord; 2018 Sep; 57():65-73. PubMed ID: 29454469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abnormal processing of prosodic boundary in adults who stutter: An ERP study.
    Liu M; Xing Y; Zhao L; Deng N; Li W
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Dec; 128():17-27. PubMed ID: 30423511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When will a stuttering moment occur? The determining role of speech motor preparation.
    Vanhoutte S; Cosyns M; van Mierlo P; Batens K; Corthals P; De Letter M; Van Borsel J; Santens P
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jun; 86():93-102. PubMed ID: 27106391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Phonological priming in adults who stutter.
    Vincent I; Grela BG; Gilbert HR
    J Fluency Disord; 2012 Jun; 37(2):91-105. PubMed ID: 22531285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.