These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26971476)

  • 21. Abnormal processing of prosodic boundary in adults who stutter: An ERP study.
    Liu M; Xing Y; Zhao L; Deng N; Li W
    Brain Cogn; 2018 Dec; 128():17-27. PubMed ID: 30423511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. When will a stuttering moment occur? The determining role of speech motor preparation.
    Vanhoutte S; Cosyns M; van Mierlo P; Batens K; Corthals P; De Letter M; Van Borsel J; Santens P
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Jun; 86():93-102. PubMed ID: 27106391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Phonological priming in adults who stutter.
    Vincent I; Grela BG; Gilbert HR
    J Fluency Disord; 2012 Jun; 37(2):91-105. PubMed ID: 22531285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multitasking costs in close-head injury patients. A fine-grained analysis.
    Dell'Acqua R; Pashler H; Stablum F
    Exp Brain Res; 2003 Sep; 152(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 12802554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Auditory pre-attentive processing of Chinese tones.
    Yang LJ; Cao KL; Wei CG; Liu YZ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 Dec; 121(23):2429-33. PubMed ID: 19102963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. P3 event-related brain potential reflects allocation and use of central processing capacity in language production.
    Shitova N; Roelofs A; Coughler C; Schriefers H
    Neuropsychologia; 2017 Nov; 106():138-145. PubMed ID: 28958910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ERP indices of resource allocation difficulties in mild head injury.
    Solbakk AK; Reinvang I; Nielsen CS
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2000 Dec; 22(6):743-60. PubMed ID: 11320433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing the performance of people who stutter and people who do not stutter on the Test of Everyday Attention.
    Doneva S; Davis S; Cavenagh P
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2018 Aug; 40(6):544-558. PubMed ID: 29064318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cognitive control of action naming in adults who stutter.
    Maxfield ND
    J Fluency Disord; 2021 Dec; 70():105841. PubMed ID: 33667938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Communication restriction in adults who stutter.
    Lee A; Van Dulm O; Robb MP; Ormond T
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2015 Jul; 29(7):536-56. PubMed ID: 25894831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Event-related potential and autonomic signs of maladaptive information processing during an auditory oddball task in panic disorder.
    Wise V; McFarlane AC; Clark CR; Battersby M
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Oct; 74(1):34-44. PubMed ID: 19607864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effects of concurrent task demands on language planning in fluent children and adults.
    Sasisekaran J; Donohue C
    Appl Psycholinguist; 2016 Nov; 37(6):1311-1336. PubMed ID: 29375168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Phonologic processing in adults who stutter: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence.
    Weber-Fox C; Spencer RM; Spruill JE; Smith A
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Dec; 47(6):1244-58. PubMed ID: 15842008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Influence of Executive Functions on Phonemic Processing in Children Who Do and Do Not Stutter.
    Sasisekaran J; Basu S
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 60(10):2792-2807. PubMed ID: 28915513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Semantic processing of unattended meaning is modulated by additional task load: evidence from electrophysiology.
    Hohlfeld A; Sommer W
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):500-12. PubMed ID: 16099362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The cognitive loci of the display and task-relevant set size effects on distractor interference: Evidence from a dual-task paradigm.
    Park BY; Kim S; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):337-351. PubMed ID: 29124674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Semantic and Phonological Encoding in Adults Who Stutter: Silent Responses to Pictorial Stimuli.
    Vincent I
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 60(9):2537-2550. PubMed ID: 28815262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Level of interest in video clips modulates event-related potentials to auditory probes.
    Suzuki J; Nittono H; Hori T
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2005 Jan; 55(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 15598514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effects of different attention tasks on concurrent speech in adults who stutter and fluent controls.
    Eichorn N; Pirutinsky S; Marton K
    J Fluency Disord; 2019 Sep; 61():105714. PubMed ID: 31472297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: subgroups with atypical auditory processing.
    Foundas AL; Corey DM; Hurley MM; Heilman KM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2004 Dec; 17(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 15622019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.