These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26972183)

  • 1. Assessing ethical and peer review standards of medical journals.
    Dickens B;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 May; 133(2):249-50. PubMed ID: 26972183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meeting our ethical obligations in medical publishing: responsibilities of editors, authors, and readers of peer-reviewed journals.
    Albert DM; Liesegang TJ; Schachat AP
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 123(5):684-6. PubMed ID: 15883290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Is it time to standardize ethics guiding the peer review process?
    Bosetti F; Toscano CD
    Lipids; 2008 Feb; 43(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 18046592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Double-Blind Peer Review at Obstetrics & Gynecology.
    Casway SJ; Rouse DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Jul; 138(1):1-2. PubMed ID: 34259456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Revealing the faults in medical journals.
    Liesegang TJ
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 19333735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical health care of sex workers.
    Dickens B;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 May; 133(2):245-6. PubMed ID: 26961587
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Landmark, landmine, or landfill? The role of peer review in assessing manuscripts.
    Balistreri WF
    J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):107-8. PubMed ID: 17643754
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical issues in treating family members and close friends.
    Dickens B;
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2016 May; 133(2):247-8. PubMed ID: 26952347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Peer review is complicated.
    Goodlin RC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 192(5):1760. PubMed ID: 15902192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More on peer review: quality control for a costly product.
    Newton M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2008 Sep; 15(6):439-42. PubMed ID: 18696135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Editorial introspection: problems of a successful peer reviewed journal.
    Rossdale PD
    Equine Vet J; 1998 Jan; 30(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 9480209
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Peer Review of a Manuscript Submission: A How-To Guide for Effective and Efficient Commentary.
    Allen LA; Ho PM
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2017 Dec; 10(12):. PubMed ID: 29237748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. AJIC's peer review process: striving for ever-increasing excellence.
    Bunner C; Larson EL
    Am J Infect Control; 2013 Feb; 41(2):96. PubMed ID: 23369313
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. All about Connection: A Message from JOGC's New Managing Editor.
    Sciortino JE
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2017 Mar; 39(3):116-117. PubMed ID: 28343548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How does peer review work?
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 79(6):553-4. PubMed ID: 18650531
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Politics and peer review.
    Magnus D
    Am J Bioeth; 2004; 4(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 15035920
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomedical Journals in India: some critical concerns.
    Satyanarayana K; Sharma A
    Indian J Med Res; 2010 Aug; 132():119-22. PubMed ID: 20716810
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Peer review: does it work?
    Nahai F
    Aesthet Surg J; 2010 Jan; 30(1):110-1. PubMed ID: 20442084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scientifically and ethically responsible innovation and research in ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Chervenak FA; McCullough LB
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jul; 28(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 16795122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Training and experience of peer reviewers: an additional variable to consider.
    Kulstad E
    PLoS Med; 2007 Mar; 4(3):e143; author reply e145. PubMed ID: 17388681
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.