These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26972387)
1. Predictive statistical models of baseline variations in 3-D femoral cortex morphology. Zhang J; Hislop-Jambrich J; Besier TF Med Eng Phys; 2016 May; 38(5):450-7. PubMed ID: 26972387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Exploring inter-subject anatomic variability using a population of patient-specific femurs and a statistical shape and intensity model. Bah MT; Shi J; Browne M; Suchier Y; Lefebvre F; Young P; King L; Dunlop DG; Heller MO Med Eng Phys; 2015 Oct; 37(10):995-1007. PubMed ID: 26363532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic methods for characterization of sexual dimorphism of adult femora: distal femur. Mahfouz MR; Merkl BC; Fatah EE; Booth R; Argenson JN Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2007 Dec; 10(6):447-56. PubMed ID: 17891677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computerized morphometric analysis of the femoral diaphyseal canal. Toni A; Fabbri F; Scimeca GB; Zanotti Russo MC; Baruffaldi F; Cianci R; Giunti A Chir Organi Mov; 1995; 80(2):207-19. PubMed ID: 7587522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated method for computing the morphological and clinical parameters of the proximal femur using heuristic modeling techniques. Cerveri P; Marchente M; Bartels W; Corten K; Simon JP; Manzotti A Ann Biomed Eng; 2010 May; 38(5):1752-66. PubMed ID: 20177779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a fully automatic shape model matching (FASMM) system to derive statistical shape models from radiographs: application to the accurate capture and global representation of proximal femur shape. Lindner C; Thiagarajah S; Wilkinson JM; ; Wallis GA; Cootes TF Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2013 Oct; 21(10):1537-44. PubMed ID: 23954703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Is the canal flare index a reliable means of estimation of canal shape? Measurement of proximal femoral geometry by use of 3D models of the femur. Tawada K; Iguchi H; Tanaka N; Watanabe N; Murakami S; Hasegawa S; Otsuka T J Orthop Sci; 2015 May; 20(3):498-506. PubMed ID: 25740729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of eldecalcitol, an active vitamin D analog, on hip structure and biomechanical properties: 3D assessment by clinical CT. Ito M; Nakamura T; Fukunaga M; Shiraki M; Matsumoto T Bone; 2011 Sep; 49(3):328-34. PubMed ID: 21605716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A semi-automated method for measuring femoral shape to derive version and its comparison with existing methods. Berryman F; Pynsent P; McBryde C Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng; 2014 Nov; 30(11):1314-25. PubMed ID: 25044860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of femur reconstruction from sparse geometric data using a statistical shape model. Zhang J; Besier TF Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 Apr; 20(5):566-576. PubMed ID: 27998170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the 3-D shape and mechanics of the proximal femur using a shape template and a bone mineral density image. Väänänen SP; Isaksson H; Julkunen P; Sirola J; Kröger H; Jurvelin JS Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2011 Jul; 10(4):529-38. PubMed ID: 20809392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Femur shape prediction by multiple regression based on quadric surface fitting. Sholukha V; Chapman T; Salvia P; Moiseev F; Euran F; Rooze M; Van Sint Jan S J Biomech; 2011 Feb; 44(4):712-8. PubMed ID: 21122862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Validation of statistical shape model based reconstruction of the proximal femur--A morphology study. Schumann S; Tannast M; Nolte LP; Zheng G Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jul; 32(6):638-44. PubMed ID: 20435501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 2D-3D shape reconstruction of the distal femur from stereo X-ray imaging using statistical shape models. Baka N; Kaptein BL; de Bruijne M; van Walsum T; Giphart JE; Niessen WJ; Lelieveldt BP Med Image Anal; 2011 Dec; 15(6):840-50. PubMed ID: 21600836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development of subject-specific and statistical shape models of the knee using an efficient segmentation and mesh-morphing approach. Baldwin MA; Langenderfer JE; Rullkoetter PJ; Laz PJ Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2010 Mar; 97(3):232-40. PubMed ID: 19695732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Determining the degree of cortical bone asymmetry in bilateral, nonpathological, human femur pairs. Rosenbaum TG; Hamblin T; Bloebaum RD J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Mar; 76(3):450-5. PubMed ID: 16270336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Establishing the 3-D finite element solid model of femurs in partial by volume rendering. Zhang Y; Zhong W; Zhu H; Chen Y; Xu L; Zhu J Int J Surg; 2013; 11(9):930-4. PubMed ID: 23832095 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Development and Validation of Statistical Models of Femur Geometry for Use with Parametric Finite Element Models. Klein KF; Hu J; Reed MP; Hoff CN; Rupp JD Ann Biomed Eng; 2015 Oct; 43(10):2503-14. PubMed ID: 25808208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]