These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26972816)
1. Experimental determination of the photon-energy dependent dose-to-water response of TLD600 and TLD700 (LiF:Mg,Ti) thermoluminescence detectors. Schwahofer A; Feist H; Georg H; Häring P; Schlegel W Z Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 27(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 26972816 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Whole-body dose and energy measurements in radiotherapy by a combination of LiF:Mg,Cu,P and LiF:Mg,Ti. Hauri P; Schneider U Z Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 28(2):96-109. PubMed ID: 28807441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV). Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the relationship between dose-, energy- and LET-response of thermoluminescent detectors. Olko P; Bilski P; El-Faramawy NA; Göksu HY; Kim JL; Kopec R; Waligórski MP Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):15-22. PubMed ID: 16644968 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Energy responses of the LiF series TL pellets to high-energy photons in the energy range from 1.25 to 21 MV. Kim JL; Lee JI; Ji YH; Kim BH; Kim JS; Chang SY Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 119(1-4):353-6. PubMed ID: 16644960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the feasibility of absolute 3D dosimetry using LiF thermoluminescence detectors and polymer gels on a 0.35T MR-LINAC. Schwahofer A; Mann P; Spindeldreier CK; Karger CP Phys Med Biol; 2020 Oct; 65(21):215002. PubMed ID: 33104524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of phantom materials on the energy dependence of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters exposed to 20-300 kV narrow x-ray spectra, 137Cs and 60Co photons. Massillon-J L G; Cabrera-Santiago A; Minniti R; O'Brien M; Soares CG Phys Med Biol; 2014 Aug; 59(15):4149-66. PubMed ID: 25004055 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. LiF:Mg,Ti TLD response as a function of photon energy for moderately filtered x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co. Nunn AA; Davis SD; Micka JA; DeWerd LA Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1859-69. PubMed ID: 18561661 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The response of lif thermoluminescence dosemeters to photon beams in the energy range from 30 kV x rays to 60Co gamma rays. Davis SD; Ross CK; Mobit PN; Van der Zwan L; Chase WJ; Shortt KR Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 14653324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of the mean glandular dose using LiF:Mg,Ti, LiF:Mg,Cu,P, Li2B4O7:Mn and Li2B4O7:Cu TL detectors in mammography radiation fields. Fartaria MJ; Reis C; Pereira J; Pereira MF; Cardoso JV; Santos LM; Oliveira C; Holovey V; Pascoal A; Alves JG Phys Med Biol; 2016 Sep; 61(17):6384-99. PubMed ID: 27499104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Application of different TL detectors for the photon dosimetry in mixed radiation fields used for BNCT. Burgkhardt B; Bilski P; Budzanowski M; Böttger R; Eberhardt K; Hampel G; Olko P; Straubing A Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 120(1-4):83-6. PubMed ID: 16644976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Synchrotron radiation in the study of the variation of dose response in thermoluminescence dosimeters with radiation energy. Kron T; Smith A; Hyodo K Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1996 Dec; 19(4):225-36. PubMed ID: 9060209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Microdosimetric interpretation of the photon energy response of LiF:Mg,Ti detectors. Olko P; Bilski P; Kim JL Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2002; 100(1-4):119-22. PubMed ID: 12382842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Energy dependence of new thermoluminescent detectors in terms of HP(10) values. Miljanić S; Knezević Z; Stuhec M; Ranogajec-Komor M; Krpan K; Vekić B Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2003; 106(3):253-6. PubMed ID: 14690327 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of nanoDot optically stimulated luminescence detectors and high-sensitivity MCP-N thermoluminescent detectors in the 40-300 kVp energy range. Poirier Y; Kuznetsova S; Villarreal-Barajas JE Med Phys; 2018 Jan; 45(1):402-413. PubMed ID: 29164632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Determination of absorbed dose to water around a clinical HDR (192)Ir source using LiF:Mg,Ti TLDs demonstrates an LET dependence of detector response. Carlsson Tedgren A; Elia R; Hedtjarn H; Olsson S; Alm Carlsson G Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1133-40. PubMed ID: 22320824 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Materials for thermoluminescent dose detectors and photon radiation energy detectors intended for intercomparison procedures of radiation therapy units. Kalmykov LZ Med Phys; 1994 Nov; 21(11):1715-9. PubMed ID: 7891631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Correction factors kE and kQ for LiF-TLDs for dosimetry in megavoltage electron and photon beams. Bruggmoser G; Saum R; Saum F; Gainey M; Pychlau C; Kapsch RP; Zink K Z Med Phys; 2015 Jun; 25(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 24973310 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Response of TL materials to diagnostic radiology X radiation beams. Maia AF; Caldas LV Appl Radiat Isot; 2010; 68(4-5):780-3. PubMed ID: 20097569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The low energy X-ray response of the LiF:Mg:Cu:P thermoluminescent dosemeter: a comparison with LiF:Mg:Ti. Edwards CR; Mountford PJ; Green S; Palethorpe JE; Moloney AJ Br J Radiol; 2005 Jun; 78(930):543-7. PubMed ID: 15900061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]