These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26973222)

  • 1. Evaluating arguments during instigations of defence motivation and accuracy motivation.
    Liu CH
    Br J Psychol; 2017 May; 108(2):296-317. PubMed ID: 26973222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do incompatible arguments cause extensive processing in the evaluation of arguments? The role of congruence between argument compatibility and argument quality.
    Liu CH; Lee HW; Huang PS; Chen HC; Sommers S
    Br J Psychol; 2016 Feb; 107(1):179-98. PubMed ID: 25966342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The impact of repetition-induced familiarity on agreement with weak and strong arguments.
    Moons WG; Mackie DM; Garcia-Marques T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Jan; 96(1):32-44. PubMed ID: 19210062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluating science arguments: evidence, uncertainty, and argument strength.
    Corner A; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2009 Sep; 15(3):199-212. PubMed ID: 19751071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The paradox of argument strength: how weak arguments undermine the persuasive effects of strong arguments.
    Obermaier M; Koch T
    Sci Rep; 2024 Sep; 14(1):22244. PubMed ID: 39333670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age differences in attitude change: influences of cognitive resources and motivation on responses to argument quantity.
    Wang M; Chen Y
    Psychol Aging; 2006 Sep; 21(3):581-9. PubMed ID: 16953719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effects of minority/majority source status on attitude certainty: a matching perspective.
    Tormala ZL; Desensi VL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jan; 35(1):114-25. PubMed ID: 19106081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weak > strong: the ironic effect of argument strength on supportive advocacy.
    Akhtar O; Paunesku D; Tormala ZL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Sep; 39(9):1214-26. PubMed ID: 23798375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Early sensitivity to arguments: how preschoolers weight circular arguments.
    Mercier H; Bernard S; Clément F
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Sep; 125():102-9. PubMed ID: 24485755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mood state, issue involvement, and argument strength on responses to persuasive appeals.
    Sinclair RC; Lovsin TK; Moore SE
    Psychol Rep; 2007 Dec; 101(3 Pt 1):739-53. PubMed ID: 18232427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Perceptions of entitativity and attitude change.
    Rydell RJ; McConnell AR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2005 Jan; 31(1):99-110. PubMed ID: 15574665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating the message or the messenger? Implications for self-validation in persuasion.
    Clark JK; Wegener DT; Sawicki V; Petty RE; Briñol P
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1571-84. PubMed ID: 23969619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influences of Position Justification on Perceived Bias: Immediate Effects and Carryover Across Persuasive Messages.
    Wallace LE; Wegener DT; Quinn ME; Ross AJ
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2021 Jul; 47(7):1188-1204. PubMed ID: 33048012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resistance can be good or bad: how theories of resistance and dissonance affect attitude certainty.
    Rydell RJ; Hugenberg K; McConnell AR
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Jun; 32(6):740-50. PubMed ID: 16648199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Argument Strength and the Persuasiveness of Stories.
    Schreiner C; Appel M; Isberner MB; Richter T
    Discourse Process; 2018; 55(4):371-386. PubMed ID: 29805322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Group Polarization Revisited: A Processing Effort Account.
    Sieber J; Ziegler R
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1482-1498. PubMed ID: 30885061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The relative impact of age and attractiveness stereotypes on persuasion.
    Puckett JM; Petty RE; Cacioppo JT; Fischer DL
    J Gerontol; 1983 May; 38(3):340-3. PubMed ID: 6841930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How the need for cognition scale predicts behavior in mock jury deliberations.
    Shestowsky D; Horowitz LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Jun; 28(3):305-37. PubMed ID: 15264449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scaling up interactive argumentation by providing counterarguments with a chatbot.
    Altay S; Schwartz M; Hacquin AS; Allard A; Blancke S; Mercier H
    Nat Hum Behav; 2022 Apr; 6(4):579-592. PubMed ID: 35165435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of majority versus minority source status on persuasion: a self-validation analysis.
    Horcajo J; Petty RE; Briñol P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Sep; 99(3):498-512. PubMed ID: 20649371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.