These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26973568)

  • 21. Investigating the Practical Consequences of Model Misfit in Unidimensional IRT Models.
    Crişan DR; Tendeiro JN; Meijer RR
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2017 Sep; 41(6):439-455. PubMed ID: 28804181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Practical Consequences of Item Response Theory Model Misfit in the Context of Test Equating with Mixed-Format Test Data.
    Zhao Y; Hambleton RK
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():484. PubMed ID: 28421011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [The estimation of premorbid intelligence levels in French speakers].
    Mackinnon A; Mulligan R
    Encephale; 2005; 31(1 Pt 1):31-43. PubMed ID: 15971638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The dimensionality of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory: An analysis with models of the item response theory.
    Büsch D; Hagemann N; Bender N
    Laterality; 2010 Nov; 15(6):610-28. PubMed ID: 19662566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Stop Worrying about Multiple-Choice: Fact Knowledge Does Not Change with Response Format.
    Goecke B; Staab M; Schittenhelm C; Wilhelm O
    J Intell; 2022 Nov; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 36412782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Diagnostic Classification Model for Forced-Choice Items and Noncognitive Tests.
    Huang HY
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2023 Feb; 83(1):146-180. PubMed ID: 36601255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Structure of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory With Binary and Rating Scale Items.
    Boldero JM; Bell RC; Davies RC
    J Pers Assess; 2015; 97(6):626-37. PubMed ID: 25970300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. How do respondents construe ambiguous response formats of affect items?
    Segura SL; Gonzalez-Roma V
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Nov; 85(5):956-68. PubMed ID: 14599257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adaptive Testing With a Hierarchical Item Response Theory Model.
    Wang W; Kingston N
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jan; 43(1):51-67. PubMed ID: 30573934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Test Format and Local Dependence of Items Revisited: A Case of Two Vocabulary Levels Tests.
    Ha HT
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():805450. PubMed ID: 35153927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Determinants of Difficulty and Discriminating Power of Image-based Test Items in Postgraduate Radiological Examinations.
    Rutgers DR; van Raamt F; van der Gijp A; Mol C; Ten Cate O
    Acad Radiol; 2018 May; 25(5):665-672. PubMed ID: 29198947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An Item-Level Analysis for Detecting Faking on Personality Tests: Appropriateness of Ideal Point Item Response Theory Models.
    Liu J; Zhang J
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():3090. PubMed ID: 32038431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Multilevel Reliability Measures of Latent Scores Within an Item Response Theory Framework.
    Cho SJ; Shen J; Naveiras M
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2019; 54(6):856-881. PubMed ID: 31215245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Item response theory analyses of physical functioning items in the medical outcomes study.
    Hays RD; Liu H; Spritzer K; Cella D
    Med Care; 2007 May; 45(5 Suppl 1):S32-8. PubMed ID: 17443117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. To bin or not to bin? A comparison of symptom frequency response formats in the assessment of health-related quality of life.
    Magnus BE; Kirkman M; Dutta T; Kaur M; Mannchen N
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Mar; 28(3):841-853. PubMed ID: 30484119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Improving the Factor Structure of Psychological Scales: The Expanded Format as an Alternative to the Likert Scale Format.
    Zhang X; Savalei V
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Jun; 76(3):357-386. PubMed ID: 27182074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Unidimensional IRT Item Parameter Estimates Across Equivalent Test Forms With Confounding Specifications Within Dimensions.
    Matlock KL; Turner R
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Apr; 76(2):258-279. PubMed ID: 29795865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Do different response formats affect how test takers approach a clinical reasoning task? An experimental study on antecedents of diagnostic accuracy using a constructed response and a selected response format.
    Schauber SK; Hautz SC; Kämmer JE; Stroben F; Hautz WE
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2021 Oct; 26(4):1339-1354. PubMed ID: 33977409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Derivation and Applicability of Asymptotic Results for Multiple Subtests Person-Fit Statistics.
    Albers CJ; Meijer RR; Tendeiro JN
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Jun; 40(4):274-288. PubMed ID: 29881053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Impact of Test and Sample Characteristics on Model Selection and Classification Accuracy in the Multilevel Mixture IRT Model.
    Sen S; Cohen AS
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():197. PubMed ID: 32116973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.