These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26973583)

  • 1. On the prospect of an experimental account of argumentation. Commentary: Toward an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem arguments.
    Boongaling JI
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():299. PubMed ID: 26973583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Toward an experimental account of argumentation: the case of the slippery slope and the ad hominem arguments.
    Lillo-Unglaube M; Canales-Johnson A; Navarrete G; Bravo CF
    Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1420. PubMed ID: 25566112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Discounting testimony with the argument ad hominem and a Bayesian congruent prior model.
    Bhatia JS; Oaksford M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Sep; 41(5):1548-59. PubMed ID: 26147667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Slippery Slope Argument in the Ethical Debate on Genetic Engineering of Humans.
    Walton D
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Dec; 23(6):1507-1528. PubMed ID: 28000092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reasoning on conflicting information: An empirical study of Formal Argumentation.
    Guillaume M; Cramer M; van der Torre L; Schiltz C
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(8):e0273225. PubMed ID: 35984811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An Argumentation-Based Analysis of the Simonshaven Case.
    Prakken H
    Top Cogn Sci; 2020 Oct; 12(4):1068-1091. PubMed ID: 30873711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating and selecting arguments in the context of higher order uncertainty.
    Straßer C; Michajlova L
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1133998. PubMed ID: 37275534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. How argumentation theory can inform assessment validity: A critical review.
    Kinnear B; Schumacher DJ; Driessen EW; Varpio L
    Med Educ; 2022 Nov; 56(11):1064-1075. PubMed ID: 35851965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A logical analysis of slippery slope arguments.
    Spielthenner G
    Health Care Anal; 2010 Jun; 18(2):148-63. PubMed ID: 19507036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Argumentation and explanation in the law.
    Rotolo A; Sartor G
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1130559. PubMed ID: 37731604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Rational hypocrisy: a Bayesian analysis based on informal argumentation and slippery slopes.
    Rai TS; Holyoak KJ
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(7):1456-67. PubMed ID: 24646370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Slippery slope arguments imply opposition to change.
    Haigh M; Wood JS; Stewart AJ
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):819-36. PubMed ID: 26886759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Do medical students generate sound arguments during small group discussions in problem-based learning?: an analysis of preclinical medical students' argumentation according to a framework of hypothetico-deductive reasoning.
    Ju H; Choi I; Yoon BY
    Korean J Med Educ; 2017 Jun; 29(2):101-109. PubMed ID: 28597873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The Logic of Scientific Reasoning in Peer Review Process].
    Takata N; Mimura M
    Brain Nerve; 2022 Apr; 74(4):335-340. PubMed ID: 35437285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Argumentation in anonymous online discussions about decriminalising cannabis use.
    Hämäläinen L; Lahti E
    Nordisk Alkohol Nark; 2021 Aug; 38(4):329-344. PubMed ID: 35308109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An argumentation semantics for rational human evaluation of arguments.
    Cramer M; van der Torre L
    Front Artif Intell; 2023; 6():1045663. PubMed ID: 37035533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Argumentation Analysis of Risk Assessments: The Case of Perfluorooctanoic Acid.
    Jongeneel WP; van Klaveren H; Bogers RP; Dévilee J; Rijs KR; Piersma A; Vermeire T; Lebret E
    Risk Anal; 2022 Apr; 42(4):770-785. PubMed ID: 34296455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comprehensive approach to argumentation.
    Judson PN; Vessey JD
    J Chem Inf Comput Sci; 2003; 43(5):1356-63. PubMed ID: 14502467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. 'What matters to Andrew'. The problem of premissary relevance in automated health advisors. Insights from pragma-dialectics.
    Rubinelli S; Labrie NH; O'Keefe DJ
    Patient Educ Couns; 2013 Aug; 92(2):218-22. PubMed ID: 23683339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.