These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26973585)
1. Effects of Hearing Loss and Cognitive Load on Speech Recognition with Competing Talkers. Meister H; Schreitmüller S; Ortmann M; Rählmann S; Walger M Front Psychol; 2016; 7():301. PubMed ID: 26973585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners. Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss. Lewis DE; Smith NA; Spalding JL; Valente DL Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):783-794. PubMed ID: 29252979 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Speech perception in children with cochlear implants: effects of lexical difficulty, talker variability, and word length. Kirk KI; Hay-McCutcheon M; Sehgal ST; Miyamoto RT Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl; 2000 Dec; 185():79-81. PubMed ID: 11141016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of Sensorineural Hearing Loss on Cortical Synchronization to Competing Speech during Selective Attention. Fuglsang SA; Märcher-Rørsted J; Dau T; Hjortkjær J J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 40(12):2562-2572. PubMed ID: 32094201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Word Identification With Temporally Interleaved Competing Sounds by Younger and Older Adult Listeners. Helfer KS; Poissant SF; Merchant GR Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):603-614. PubMed ID: 31567564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities? Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Lexical and talker effects on word recognition among native and non-native listeners with normal and impaired hearing. Takayanagi S; Dirks DD; Moshfegh A J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2002 Jun; 45(3):585-97. PubMed ID: 12069010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Revealing Perceptional and Cognitive Mechanisms in Static and Dynamic Cocktail Party Listening by Means of Error Analyses. Wächtler M; Kessler J; Walger M; Meister H Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221111676. PubMed ID: 35849353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implicit and explicit learning in talker identification. Lee JJ; Perrachione TK Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):2002-2015. PubMed ID: 35534783 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of talker continuity and speech rate on auditory working memory. Lim SJ; Shinn-Cunningham BG; Perrachione TK Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1167-1177. PubMed ID: 30737757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of Age and Hearing Loss on the Recognition of Emotions in Speech. Christensen JA; Sis J; Kulkarni AM; Chatterjee M Ear Hear; 2019; 40(5):1069-1083. PubMed ID: 30614835 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Recognising foreign-accented speech of varying intelligibility and linguistic complexity: insights from older listeners with or without hearing loss. Strori D; Bradlow AR; Souza PE Int J Audiol; 2021 Feb; 60(2):140-150. PubMed ID: 32972283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of Age and Working Memory Capacity on Speech Recognition Performance in Noise Among Listeners With Normal Hearing. Gordon-Salant S; Cole SS Ear Hear; 2016; 37(5):593-602. PubMed ID: 27232071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Non-native listeners' recognition of high-variability speech using PRESTO. Tamati TN; Pisoni DB J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Oct; 25(9):869-92. PubMed ID: 25405842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology. Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Alexander G Ear Hear; 2016; 37(6):e360-e376. PubMed ID: 27438869 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improved segregation of simultaneous talkers differentially affects perceptual and cognitive capacity demands for recognizing speech in competing speech. Francis AL Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Feb; 72(2):501-16. PubMed ID: 20139463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multichannel speech intelligibility and talker recognition using monaural, binaural, and three-dimensional auditory presentation. Drullman R; Bronkhorst AW J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Apr; 107(4):2224-35. PubMed ID: 10790048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors that can affect divided speech intelligibility. Fumero MJ; Marrufo-Pérez MI; Eustaquio-Martín A; Lopez-Poveda EA Hear Res; 2024 Jan; 441():108917. PubMed ID: 38061268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Listening Effort by Native and Nonnative Listeners Due to Noise, Reverberation, and Talker Foreign Accent During English Speech Perception. Peng ZE; Wang LM J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Apr; 62(4):1068-1081. PubMed ID: 30986135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]