These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26973585)

  • 21. Some Neurocognitive Correlates of Noise-Vocoded Speech Perception in Children With Normal Hearing: A Replication and Extension of ).
    Roman AS; Pisoni DB; Kronenberger WG; Faulkner KF
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):344-356. PubMed ID: 28045787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial release of cognitive load measured in a dual-task paradigm in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Xia J; Nooraei N; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):1888-98. PubMed ID: 25920841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Detection and Recognition of Asynchronous Auditory/Visual Speech: Effects of Age, Hearing Loss, and Talker Accent.
    Gordon-Salant S; Schwartz MS; Oppler KA; Yeni-Komshian GH
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():772867. PubMed ID: 35153900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The Effect of Background Noise on Immediate Free Recall of Words in Younger and Older Listeners with Hearing Loss.
    Hwang JS; Jung Y; Lee JH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2020 Nov; 31(10):701-707. PubMed ID: 33588512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Hierarchical contributions of linguistic knowledge to talker identification: Phonological versus lexical familiarity.
    McLaughlin DE; Carter YD; Cheng CC; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1088-1107. PubMed ID: 31218598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Talker variability in word recognition under cochlear implant simulation: Does talker gender matter?
    Tamati TN; Sijp L; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Apr; 147(4):EL370. PubMed ID: 32359292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cognitive resources related to speech recognition with a competing talker in young and older listeners.
    Meister H; Schreitmüller S; Grugel L; Ortmann M; Beutner D; Walger M; Meister IG
    Neuroscience; 2013 Mar; 232():74-82. PubMed ID: 23246616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A Competing Voices Test for Hearing-Impaired Listeners Applied to Spatial Separation and Ideal Time-Frequency Masks.
    Bramsløw L; Vatti M; Rossing R; Naithani G; Henrik Pontoppidan N
    Trends Hear; 2019; 23():2331216519848288. PubMed ID: 31104580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The Adaptation to Mandarin-Accented English by Older, Hearing-Impaired Listeners Following Brief Exposure to the Accent.
    Hau JA; Holt CM; Finch S; Dowell RC
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2020 Mar; 63(3):858-871. PubMed ID: 32109171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Concurrent OLSA Test: A Method for Speech Recognition in Multi-talker Situations at Fixed SNR.
    Heeren J; Nuesse T; Latzel M; Holube I; Hohmann V; Wagener KC; Schulte M
    Trends Hear; 2022; 26():23312165221108257. PubMed ID: 35702051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. One Size Does Not Fit All: Examining the Effects of Working Memory Capacity on Spoken Word Recognition in Older Adults Using Eye Tracking.
    Nitsan G; Banai K; Ben-David BM
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():841466. PubMed ID: 35478743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Having Two Ears Facilitates the Perceptual Separation of Concurrent Talkers for Bilateral and Single-Sided Deaf Cochlear Implantees.
    Bernstein JG; Goupell MJ; Schuchman GI; Rivera AL; Brungart DS
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(3):289-302. PubMed ID: 26886027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of talker- and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test.
    Markham D; Hazan V
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2004 Aug; 47(4):725-37. PubMed ID: 15324282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Contributions of Voice Expectations to Talker Selection in Younger and Older Adults With Normal Hearing.
    Bologna WJ; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Trends Hear; 2020; 24():2331216520915110. PubMed ID: 32372720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Examination of the neighborhood activation theory in normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Dirks DD; Takayanagi S; Moshfegh A; Noffsinger PD; Fausti SA
    Ear Hear; 2001 Feb; 22(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 11271971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.
    Kreitewolf J; Mathias SR; von Kriegstein K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1584. PubMed ID: 28959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Selecting among competing models of talker adaptation: Attention, cognition, and memory in speech processing efficiency.
    Kapadia AM; Perrachione TK
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104393. PubMed ID: 32688132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Costs of dynamic cocktail party listening: Investigating the effects of cognitive abilities and hearing impairment.
    Wächtler M; Kessler J; Walger M; Meister H
    JASA Express Lett; 2021 Jul; 1(7):075201. PubMed ID: 36154643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.