BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26974218)

  • 61. Authors' reply: Cerclage or cervical occlusion--what's the difference?
    Brix N; Secher NJ; Henriksen TB
    BJOG; 2014 Aug; 121(9):1173-4. PubMed ID: 25047487
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Balloon tamponade for successful emergency cervical cerclage.
    Lv M; Zhao B; Chen Y; Xi F; Zhan Q; Wang Y; Pu Y; Luo Q
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2020 Mar; 46(3):418-424. PubMed ID: 31922306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Transabdominal cerclage: preconceptual versus first trimester insertion.
    Dawood F; Farquharson RG
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Apr; 199():27-31. PubMed ID: 26896593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Transabdominal cerclage after comprehensive evaluation of women with previous unsuccessful transvaginal cerclage.
    Debbs RH; DeLa Vega GA; Pearson S; Sehdev H; Marchiano D; Ludmir J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Sep; 197(3):317.e1-4. PubMed ID: 17826436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of triangular 3-bites and mcdonald techniques of cervical cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency: A pilot study.
    Ikechebelu JI; Dim CC; Okpala BC; Eleje GU; JoeIkechebelu NN; Echezona DM; Nnoruka MC; Nwajiaku LA; Nwachukwu CE; Okam PC; Chigozie AI; Okpala AN; Igbodike EP
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2023 May; 26(5):630-635. PubMed ID: 37357481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Bridge Suture for Successful McDonald Emergency Cerclage.
    Tanaka M; Hori Y; Shirafuji A; Kato M; Kato J; Kobayashi H; Tsuchida T; Fukae T
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2017; 82(5):446-452. PubMed ID: 27771710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice: can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified?
    Romero R; Espinoza J; Erez O; Hassan S
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Jan; 194(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 16389003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Management of cervical incompetence in Aba, south-eastern Nigeria.
    Feyi-Waboso PA; Umezurike CC
    Niger J Med; 2005; 14(4):400-4. PubMed ID: 16353700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Could a cervical occlusion suture be effective at improving perinatal outcome?
    Noori M; Helmig RB; Hein M; Steer PJ
    BJOG; 2007 May; 114(5):532-6. PubMed ID: 17439562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The role of routine cervical length screening in selected high- and low-risk women for preterm birth prevention.
    ; McIntosh J; Feltovich H; Berghella V; Manuck T
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Sep; 215(3):B2-7. PubMed ID: 27133011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Pre- and post-McDonald cerclage cervical length, width and funneling rate and their association with duration of pregnancy.
    Azar ZF; Hakimi P; Ghojazadeh M; Ghatresamani F
    Pak J Biol Sci; 2011 Apr; 14(8):502-6. PubMed ID: 21936255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Indications for and pregnancy outcomes of cervical cerclage: 11-year comparison of patients undergoing history-indicated, ultrasound-indicated, or rescue cerclage.
    Chan LL; Leung TW; Lo TK; Lau WL; Leung WC
    Hong Kong Med J; 2015 Aug; 21(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 26183455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Trachelorraphy in cases of recurrent second trimester loss and prior failed vaginal cerclage.
    Korb D; Oury JF; Sibony O
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 180():126-9. PubMed ID: 25126718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Noninvasive cerclage for the management of cervical incompetence: a prospective study.
    Acharya G; Eschler B; Grønberg M; Hentemann M; Ottersen T; Maltau JM
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2006 Feb; 273(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 16222537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. [Transvaginal cervico-isthmic cerclage using polypropylene tape: Surgical procedure and pregnancy outcome].
    Kdous M; Ferchiou M; Chaker A; Zhioua F
    Tunis Med; 2015 Feb; 93(2):85-91. PubMed ID: 26337305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. [Cervical cerclage--when is it effective?].
    Mikhova M; Dimitrova V; Tsankova M
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2006; 45(7):6-11. PubMed ID: 17489162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Proteomic Analysis of Amniotic Fluid Proteins for Predicting the Outcome of Emergency Cerclage in Women with Cervical Insufficiency.
    Lee J; Lee JE; Choi JW; Han MH; Seong SY; Park KH; Park JW
    Reprod Sci; 2020 Jun; 27(6):1318-1329. PubMed ID: 32046453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Re: vaginal progesterone, cerclage or cervical pessary for preventing preterm birth in asymptomatic singleton pregnant women with history of preterm birth and a sonographic short cervix. Z. Alfirevic, J. Owen, E. Carreras Moratonas, A. N. Sharp, J. M. Szychowski, M. Goya. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 146-151.
    Makrydimas G
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Feb; 41(2):130. PubMed ID: 23371345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. McDonald versus Shirodkar cerclage technique in women requiring a prophylactic cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
    Issah A; Diacci R; Williams KP; Aubin AM; McAuliffe L; Phung J; Wang C; Maouris P; Pennell CE
    Syst Rev; 2021 May; 10(1):130. PubMed ID: 33931124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Current controversies in cervical cerclage.
    Rand L; Norwitz ER
    Semin Perinatol; 2003 Feb; 27(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 12641304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.