164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26974835)
41. Identifiable Risk Factors to Minimize Postoperative Urinary Retention in Modern Outpatient Rapid Recovery Total Joint Arthroplasty.
Ziemba-Davis M; Nielson M; Kraus K; Duncan N; Nayyar N; Meneghini RM
J Arthroplasty; 2019 Jul; 34(7S):S343-S347. PubMed ID: 30956046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Risk factors for postoperative urinary retention following elective spine surgery: a meta-analysis.
Chang Y; Chi KY; Tai TW; Cheng YS; Lee PH; Huang CC; Lee JS
Spine J; 2021 Nov; 21(11):1802-1811. PubMed ID: 34015508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Perioperative and postoperative complications of single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in elderly adults.
Lee P; Fessler RG
J Clin Neurosci; 2012 Jan; 19(1):111-4. PubMed ID: 22133812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Complication rates associated with open versus percutaneous pedicle screw instrumentation among patients undergoing minimally invasive interbody fusion for adult spinal deformity.
Than KD; Mummaneni PV; Bridges KJ; Tran S; Park P; Chou D; La Marca F; Uribe JS; Vogel TD; Nunley PD; Eastlack RK; Anand N; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS; Mundis GM
Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Dec; 43(6):E7. PubMed ID: 29191098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Factors associated with postoperative urinary retention in patients undergoing penile prosthesis implantation.
Drevik JA; Dalimov Z; Lucas J; Simhan J; Cohn JA
Int J Impot Res; 2024 May; 36(3):201-205. PubMed ID: 36198809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in the elderly: a 10-year experience.
Agarwal N; Faramand A; Alan N; Tempel ZJ; Hamilton DK; Okonkwo DO; Kanter AS
J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Nov; 29(5):525-529. PubMed ID: 30052150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Obesity and self-reported outcome after minimally invasive lumbar spinal fusion surgery.
Rosen DS; Ferguson SD; Ogden AT; Huo D; Fessler RG
Neurosurgery; 2008 Nov; 63(5):956-60; discussion 960. PubMed ID: 19005386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Reduced Acute Care Costs With the ERAS® Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Conventional Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Wang MY; Chang HK; Grossman J
Neurosurgery; 2018 Oct; 83(4):827-834. PubMed ID: 28945854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. The effect of surgical level on self-reported clinical outcomes after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: L4-L5 versus L5-S1.
Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Nixon AT; Dahdaleh NS; Wong AP; Khanna R; Barnawi A; Fessler RG
World Neurosurg; 2014 Jan; 81(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 23916495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Application of Gelatin Sponge Impregnated with a Mixture of 3 Drugs to Intraoperative Nerve Root Block Combined with Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery in the Treatment of Adult Degenerative Scoliosis: A Clinical Observation Including 96 Patients.
Du JP; Fan Y; Liu JJ; Zhang JN; Chang Liu S; Hao D
World Neurosurg; 2017 Dec; 108():791-797. PubMed ID: 28986228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Unilateral Fixation for Degenerative Lumbar Disease.
Wang HW; Hu YC; Wu ZY; Wu HR; Wu CF; Zhang LS; Xu WK; Fan HL; Cai JS; Ma JQ
Orthop Surg; 2017 Aug; 9(3):277-283. PubMed ID: 28960820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effect of Anatomic Variability and Level of Approach on Perioperative Vascular Complications With Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Nourian AA; Cunningham CM; Bagheri A; Bruffey JD; Eastlack RK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E73-7. PubMed ID: 26335679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Comparison of minimally invasive spine surgery using intraoperative computed tomography integrated navigation, fluoroscopy, and conventional open surgery for lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective registry-based cohort study.
Wu MH; Dubey NK; Li YY; Lee CY; Cheng CC; Shi CS; Huang TJ
Spine J; 2017 Aug; 17(8):1082-1090. PubMed ID: 28412560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Primary and Revision Posterior Lumbar Fusion Have Similar Short-Term Complication Rates.
Basques BA; Diaz-Collado PJ; Geddes BJ; Samuel AM; Lukasiewicz AM; Webb ML; Bohl DD; Ahn J; Singh K; Grauer JN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 Jan; 41(2):E101-6. PubMed ID: 26539938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Intraoperative reduction does not result in better outcomes in low-grade lumbar spondylolisthesis with neurogenic symptoms after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion-a 5-year follow-up study.
Tay KS; Bassi A; Yeo W; Yue WM
Spine J; 2016 Feb; 16(2):182-90. PubMed ID: 26515392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Use of motor evoked potentials during lateral lumbar interbody fusion reduces postoperative deficits.
Riley MR; Doan AT; Vogel RW; Aguirre AO; Pieri KS; Scheid EH
Spine J; 2018 Oct; 18(10):1763-1778. PubMed ID: 29505853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Clinical outcomes following spinal fusion using an intraoperative computed tomographic 3D imaging system.
Xiao R; Miller JA; Sabharwal NC; Lubelski D; Alentado VJ; Healy AT; Mroz TE; Benzel EC
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 May; 26(5):628-637. PubMed ID: 28291408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Minimally Invasive Versus Open Lumbar Fusion: A Comparison of Blood Loss, Surgical Complications, and Hospital Course.
Patel AA; Zfass-Mendez M; Lebwohl NH; Wang MY; Green BA; Levi AD; Vanni S; Williams SK
Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():130-4. PubMed ID: 26361455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
