312 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26975896)
1. Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP) vs Praat for Assessing Euphonic Subjects: A Preliminary Study on the Gender-discriminating Power of Acoustic Analysis Software.
Lovato A; De Colle W; Giacomelli L; Piacente A; Righetto L; Marioni G; de Filippis C
J Voice; 2016 Nov; 30(6):765.e1-765.e5. PubMed ID: 26975896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predicting Voice Disorder Status From Smoothed Measures of Cepstral Peak Prominence Using Praat and Analysis of Dysphonia in Speech and Voice (ADSV).
Sauder C; Bretl M; Eadie T
J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):557-566. PubMed ID: 28169094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Reliable jitter and shimmer measurements in voice clinics: the relevance of vowel, gender, vocal intensity, and fundamental frequency effects in a typical clinical task.
Brockmann M; Drinnan MJ; Storck C; Carding PN
J Voice; 2011 Jan; 25(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 20381308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Voice disorders in severe obstructive sleep apnea patients and comparison of two acoustic analysis software programs: MDVP and Praat.
Wei M; Du J; Wang X; Lu H; Wang W; Lin P
Sleep Breath; 2021 Mar; 25(1):433-439. PubMed ID: 32583274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Normative Values and Interrelationship of MDVP Voice Analysis Parameters Before and After Endotracheal Intubation.
Sørensen MK; Durck TT; Bork KH; Rasmussen N
J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):626-30. PubMed ID: 26234917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Measuring the Dysphonia Severity Index (DSI) in the Program Praat.
Maryn Y; Morsomme D; De Bodt M
J Voice; 2017 Sep; 31(5):644.e29-644.e40. PubMed ID: 28187924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fundamental Frequency and Jitter Percent in MDVP and PRAAT.
Mohammed AA; Nagy A
J Voice; 2023 Jul; 37(4):496-503. PubMed ID: 33926765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Comparison of Cepstral Peak Prominence Measures From Two Acoustic Analysis Programs.
Watts CR; Awan SN; Maryn Y
J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):387.e1-387.e10. PubMed ID: 27751661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. An Innovative Voice Analyzer "VA" Smart Phone Program for Quantitative Analysis of Voice Quality.
Kojima T; Fujimura S; Hori R; Okanoue Y; Shoji K; Inoue M
J Voice; 2019 Sep; 33(5):642-648. PubMed ID: 29801970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mobile Digital Recording: Adequacy of the iRig and iOS Device for Acoustic and Perceptual Analysis of Normal Voice.
Oliveira G; Fava G; Baglione M; Pimpinella M
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):236-242. PubMed ID: 27423820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Objective Evaluation of Presbyphonia: Spectroacoustic Study on 142 Patients with Praat.
Mezzedimi C; Di Francesco M; Livi W; Spinosi MC; De Felice C
J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e25-257.e32. PubMed ID: 27427181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic Perturbation Measures Improve with Increasing Vocal Intensity in Individuals With and Without Voice Disorders.
Brockmann-Bauser M; Bohlender JE; Mehta DD
J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):162-168. PubMed ID: 28528786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Survey of Voice Acoustic Parameters in Iranian Female Teachers.
Mohseni R; Sandoughdar N
J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):507.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26275636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reliable acoustic measurements in children between 5;0 and 9;11 years: Gender, age, height and weight effects on fundamental frequency, jitter and shimmer in phonations without and with controlled voice SPL.
Brockmann-Bauser M; Beyer D; Bohlender JE
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2035-42. PubMed ID: 26412461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Acoustic Analysis of Normal Voice Patterns in Italian Adults by Using Praat.
Gorris C; Ricci Maccarini A; Vanoni F; Poggioli M; Vaschetto R; Garzaro M; Aluffi Valletti P
J Voice; 2020 Nov; 34(6):961.e9-961.e18. PubMed ID: 31130291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Materials of acoustic analysis: sustained vowel versus sentence.
Moon KR; Chung SM; Park HS; Kim HS
J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):563-5. PubMed ID: 22516312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Voice loudness and gender effects on jitter and shimmer in healthy adults.
Brockmann M; Storck C; Carding PN; Drinnan MJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2008 Oct; 51(5):1152-60. PubMed ID: 18664710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity of jitter measures in non-quasi-periodic voices. Part II: the effect of noise.
Manfredi C; Giordano A; Schoentgen J; Fraj S; Bocchi L; Dejonckere P
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2011 Jul; 36(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 21609247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integrating voice evaluation: correlation between acoustic and audio-perceptual measures.
Vaz Freitas S; Melo Pestana P; Almeida V; Ferreira A
J Voice; 2015 May; 29(3):390.e1-7. PubMed ID: 25619471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation Between Acoustic Measurements and Self-Reported Voice Disorders Among Female Teachers.
Lin FC; Chen SH; Chen SC; Wang CT; Kuo YC
J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):460-5. PubMed ID: 26096986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
