BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26976037)

  • 21. Comparison of Conventional versus Steerable-Catheter Guided Coronary Sinus Lead Positioning in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Resynchronization Device Implantation.
    Er F; Yüksel D; Hellmich M; Gassanov N
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143292. PubMed ID: 26599637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implantation of cardioverter defibrillators with minimal fluoroscopy using a three-dimensional navigation system: a feasibility study.
    Castrejón-Castrejón S; Pérez-Silva A; González-Villegas E; Al-Razzo O; Silvestre J; Doiny D; Estrada-Mucci A; Filgueiras-Rama D; Ortega-Molina M; López-Sendón JL; Merino JL
    Europace; 2013 Dec; 15(12):1763-70. PubMed ID: 23696625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predictive factors of difficult implantation procedure in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
    Bisch L; Da Costa A; Dauphinot V; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Khris L; M'baye A; Isaaz K
    Europace; 2010 Aug; 12(8):1141-8. PubMed ID: 20573673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation using a new sensor-based navigation system: results from the first human use study.
    Richter S; Döring M; Gaspar T; John S; Rolf S; Sommer P; Hindricks G; Piorkowski C
    Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol; 2013 Oct; 6(5):917-23. PubMed ID: 24002003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Using three-dimensional echocardiography to guide left ventricle lead position in cardiac resynchronization therapy: does it make any difference.
    Badran HA; Kamel JZ; Mohamed TR; Abdelhamid MA
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2017 Apr; 48(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 28194611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anatomical factors involved in difficult cardiac resynchronization therapy procedure: a non-invasive study using dual-source 64-multi-slice computed tomography.
    Da Costa A; Gate-Martinet A; Rouffiange P; Cerisier A; Nadrouss A; Bisch L; Romeyer-Bouchard C; Isaaz K
    Europace; 2012 Jun; 14(6):833-40. PubMed ID: 22117034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Reducing radiation exposure during CRT implant procedures: early experience with a sensor-based navigation system.
    Thibault B; Andrade JG; Dubuc M; Talajic M; Guerra PG; Dyrda K; Macle L; Rivard L; Roy D; Mondésert B; Khairy P
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2015 Jan; 38(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 25311868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived anatomy, scar, and dyssynchrony fused with fluoroscopy to guide LV lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison with acute haemodynamic measures and echocardiographic reverse remodelling.
    Shetty AK; Duckett SG; Ginks MR; Ma Y; Sohal M; Bostock J; Kapetanakis S; Singh JP; Rhode K; Wright M; O'Neill MD; Gill JS; Carr-White G; Razavi R; Rinaldi CA
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jul; 14(7):692-9. PubMed ID: 23175695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The safety and efficacy of electroanatomical mapping (EAM)-guided device implantation.
    Patel H; Hiner E; Naqvi A; Wrobel J; Machado C
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2019 Jul; 42(7):897-903. PubMed ID: 31106434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by multimodality cardiac imaging.
    Bertini M; Mele D; Malagù M; Fiorencis A; Toselli T; Casadei F; Cannizzaro T; Fragale C; Fucili A; Campagnolo E; Benea G; Ferrari R
    Eur J Heart Fail; 2016 Nov; 18(11):1375-1382. PubMed ID: 27406979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Near-zero x-ray in arrhythmia ablation using a 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping system: A multicenter experience.
    Giaccardi M; Del Rosso A; Guarnaccia V; Ballo P; Mascia G; Chiodi L; Colella A
    Heart Rhythm; 2016 Jan; 13(1):150-6. PubMed ID: 26341606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Preprocedural imaging in patients with transposition of the great arteries facilitates placement of cardiac resynchronization therapy leads.
    Ruckdeschel ES; Quaife R; Lewkowiez L; Kay J; Sauer WH; Collins KK; Nguyen DT
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 May; 37(5):546-53. PubMed ID: 24313876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Postprocedure mapping of cardiac resynchronization lead position using standard fluoroscopy systems: implications for the nonresponder with scar.
    Parker KM; Bunting E; Malhotra R; Clarke SA; Mason P; Darby AE; Kramer CM; Salerno M; Holmes JW; Bilchick KC
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2014 Jun; 37(6):757-67. PubMed ID: 24472061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Fluoroscopically guided implantation of modern cardiac resynchronization devices: radiation burden to the patient and associated risks.
    Perisinakis K; Theocharopoulos N; Damilakis J; Manios E; Vardas P; Gourtsoyiannis N
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2005 Dec; 46(12):2335-9. PubMed ID: 16360068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Robotic implantation of a multichamber cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator.
    Shalaby A; Sharma MS; Zenati MA
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Aug; 29(8):906-9. PubMed ID: 16923009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Combining electromagnetic navigation and 3-D mapping to reduce fluoroscopy time and achieve optimal CRT response.
    Barbero U; Budano C; Golzio PG; Castagno D; Gaita F
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2018 May; 41(5):557-560. PubMed ID: 28975636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Triple lead cephalic versus subclavian vein approach in cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation.
    Vogler J; Geisler A; Gosau N; Hakmi S; Willems S; Rassaf T; Wakili R; Kaya E
    Sci Rep; 2018 Dec; 8(1):17709. PubMed ID: 30532064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Coronary sinus anatomy by computerized tomography, overlaid on live fluoroscopy can be successfully used to guide left ventricular lead implantation: a feasibility study.
    Alikhani Z; Li J; Merchan JA; Nijhof N; Mendel J; Orlov MV
    J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 2013 Apr; 36(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 23196855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Implantation of cardiac resynchronization therapy devices using three leads by cephalic vein dissection approach.
    Hadjis A; Proietti R; Essebag V
    Europace; 2017 Sep; 19(9):1514-1520. PubMed ID: 28340223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Trainee inexperience is associated with longer procedure times but no increase in complications for cardiac device implantation.
    Soleimani Rahbar A; Hsu JC; Han FT; Nguyen N; Kwon M; Azadani PN; Marcus GM; Lee BK
    Heart Rhythm; 2013 Dec; 10(12):1755-8. PubMed ID: 24016696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.