122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26976104)
1. A comparison of the 'Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression' and the 'Montgomery-Asberg Depression rating Scale'.
Huijbrechts IP; Haffmans PM; Jonker K; van Dijke A; Hoencamp E
Acta Neuropsychiatr; 1999 Mar; 11(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 26976104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The comparison of Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS thai) to diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) and to Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD): validity and reliability.
Satthapisit S; Posayaanuwat N; Sasaluksananont C; Kaewpornsawan T; Singhakun S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Mar; 90(3):524-31. PubMed ID: 17427531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Derivation of a definition of remission on the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale corresponding to the definition of remission on the Hamilton rating scale for depression.
Zimmerman M; Posternak MA; Chelminski I
J Psychiatr Res; 2004; 38(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 15458853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Montgomery Asberg and the Hamilton ratings of depression: a comparison of measures.
Carmody TJ; Rush AJ; Bernstein I; Warden D; Brannan S; Burnham D; Woo A; Trivedi MH
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol; 2006 Dec; 16(8):601-11. PubMed ID: 16769204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and reliability of the HAM-D/MADRS interview: an integrated depression symptom rating scale.
Iannuzzo RW; Jaeger J; Goldberg JF; Kafantaris V; Sublette ME
Psychiatry Res; 2006 Nov; 145(1):21-37. PubMed ID: 17049379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Validity and test-retest reliability of the Persian version of the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale.
Ahmadpanah M; Sheikhbabaei M; Haghighi M; Roham F; Jahangard L; Akhondi A; Sadeghi Bahmani D; Bajoghli H; Holsboer-Trachsler E; Brand S
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat; 2016; 12():603-7. PubMed ID: 27022265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Validation of the Spanish versions of the Montgomery-Asberg depression and Hamilton anxiety rating scales].
Lobo A; Chamorro L; Luque A; Dal-Ré R; Badia X; Baró E;
Med Clin (Barc); 2002 Apr; 118(13):493-9. PubMed ID: 11975886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The inter-rater reliability of the Japanese version of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS) using a structured interview guide for MADRS (SIGMA).
Takahashi N; Tomita K; Higuchi T; Inada T
Hum Psychopharmacol; 2004 Apr; 19(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 15079853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Psychometric Properties of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale in Severely Obese Patients.
Paiva-Medeiros PF; Duarte-Guerra LS; Santo MA; Lotufo-Neto F; Wang YP
Span J Psychol; 2015 Sep; 18():E69. PubMed ID: 26364907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of depression in Parkinson's disease: the contribution of somatic symptoms to the clinimetric performance of the Hamilton and Montgomery-Asberg rating scales.
Reijnders JS; Lousberg R; Leentjens AF
J Psychosom Res; 2010 Jun; 68(6):561-5. PubMed ID: 20488273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rating depression severity in the elderly physically ill patient: reliability and factor structure of the Hamilton and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scales.
Hammond MF
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry; 1998 Apr; 13(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 9646154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of depressive symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease using the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.
Bunevicius A; Staniute M; Brozaitiene J; Pommer AM; Pop VJ; Montgomery SA; Bunevicius R
Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2012 Sep; 27(5):249-55. PubMed ID: 22869009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and validity of the telephone-based version of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale for assessing depression in individuals with primary brain tumour.
Harris G; Jones S; Pinkham MB; Lion KM; Ownsworth T
Disabil Rehabil; 2024 Mar; 46(6):1158-1166. PubMed ID: 37021336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inter-rater reliability among psychiatrists when assessing depression according to the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.
Geijer J; Baigi A; Aiff H
Nord J Psychiatry; 2021 Nov; 75(8):607-613. PubMed ID: 34156321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale: Baked Straight From a Randomized Study.
Santi NS; Biswal SB; Naik BN; Sahoo JP; Rath B
Cureus; 2023 Sep; 15(9):e45098. PubMed ID: 37842359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. SIGMA-VB: Validity and reliability of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale using the Structured Interview Guide for the MADRS.
Fernandes F; Carneiro A; Campos RN; Soeiro-de-Souza MG; Barros VB; Moreno RA
Braz J Psychiatry; 2019; 41(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 30785536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and validation of the Affective Self Rating Scale for manic, depressive, and mixed affective states.
Adler M; Liberg B; Andersson S; Isacsson G; Hetta J
Nord J Psychiatry; 2008; 62(2):130-5. PubMed ID: 18569776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and reliability of a structured interview guide for the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (SIGMA).
Williams JB; Kobak KA
Br J Psychiatry; 2008 Jan; 192(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 18174510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The axial diagnostic and sensitive-to-change for depression index: diagnostic utility and use in studies of therapeutic evaluation.
Villafáfila AC; Brieva JA; Labrador RG
Actas Esp Psiquiatr; 2010; 38(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 20931409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of quetiapine in the treatment of bipolar I or II depression.
Calabrese JR; Keck PE; Macfadden W; Minkwitz M; Ketter TA; Weisler RH; Cutler AJ; McCoy R; Wilson E; Mullen J
Am J Psychiatry; 2005 Jul; 162(7):1351-60. PubMed ID: 15994719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
