168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26976196)
21. Large-Strain 3-D in Vivo Breast Ultrasound Strain Elastography Using a Multi-compression Strategy and a Whole-Breast Scanning System.
Wang Y; Bayer M; Jiang J; Hall TJ
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Dec; 45(12):3145-3159. PubMed ID: 31548103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Detection of breast lesions using an automated breast volume scanner system.
Zhang Q; Hu B; Hu B; Li WB
J Int Med Res; 2012; 40(1):300-6. PubMed ID: 22429369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A novel fast full inversion based breast ultrasound elastography technique.
Karimi H; Fenster A; Samani A
Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(7):2219-33. PubMed ID: 23475227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Diagnostic algorithm: how to make use of new 2D, 3D and 4D ultrasound technologies in breast imaging.
Weismann CF; Datz L
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Nov; 64(2):250-7. PubMed ID: 17904779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interobserver reliability of automated breast volume scanner (ABVS) interpretation and agreement of ABVS findings with hand held breast ultrasound (HHUS), mammography and pathology results.
Golatta M; Franz D; Harcos A; Junkermann H; Rauch G; Scharf A; Schuetz F; Sohn C; Heil J
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Aug; 82(8):e332-6. PubMed ID: 23540947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of shear-wave and strain ultrasound elastography in the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Chang JM; Won JK; Lee KB; Park IA; Yi A; Moon WK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Aug; 201(2):W347-56. PubMed ID: 23883252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Five-dimensional ultrasound system for soft tissue visualization.
Deshmukh NP; Caban JJ; Taylor RH; Hager GD; Boctor EM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2015 Dec; 10(12):1927-39. PubMed ID: 26275675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Added value of Virtual Touch IQ shear wave elastography in the ultrasound assessment of breast lesions.
Ianculescu V; Ciolovan LM; Dunant A; Vielh P; Mazouni C; Delaloge S; Dromain C; Blidaru A; Balleyguier C
Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):773-7. PubMed ID: 24602803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Breast Elastography: How We Do It.
Gkali CA; Chalazonitis AN; Feida E; Sotiropoulou M; Giannos A; Tsigginou A; Dimitrakakis C
Ultrasound Q; 2015 Dec; 31(4):255-61. PubMed ID: 26327432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Building a virtual simulation platform for quasistatic breast ultrasound elastography using open source software: A preliminary investigation.
Wang Y; Helminen E; Jiang J
Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5453-66. PubMed ID: 26328994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assisted-freehand ultrasound elasticity imaging.
Kadour MJ; Noble JA
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2009 Jan; 56(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 19213630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions: a comparison between automatically generated breast volume scans and handheld ultrasound examinations.
Wang HY; Jiang YX; Zhu QL; Zhang J; Dai Q; Liu H; Lai XJ; Sun Q
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Nov; 81(11):3190-200. PubMed ID: 22386134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Direct and gradient-based average strain estimation by using weighted nearest neighbor cross-correlation peaks.
Hussain MA; Abu Anas EM; Alam SK; Lee SY; Hasan MK
IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Aug; 59(8):1713-28. PubMed ID: 22899118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparative study of automated breast 3-D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses.
Chen L; Chen Y; Diao XH; Fang L; Pang Y; Cheng AQ; Li WP; Wang Y
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Oct; 39(10):1735-42. PubMed ID: 23849390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Direct mean strain estimation for elastography using nearest-neighbor weighted least-squares approach in the frequency domain.
Hasan MK; Anas EM; Alam SK; Lee SY
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 38(10):1759-77. PubMed ID: 22818879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. 3-D visualization and non-linear tissue classification of breast tumors using ultrasound elastography in vivo.
Sayed A; Layne G; Abraham J; Mukdadi OM
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1490-502. PubMed ID: 24768484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interobserver agreement for sonograms of breast lesions obtained by an automated breast volume scanner.
Zhang J; Lai XJ; Zhu QL; Wang HY; Jiang YX; Liu H; Dai Q; You SS; Xiao MS; Sun Q
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2179-83. PubMed ID: 21724355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Lesion edge preserved direct average strain estimation for ultrasound elasticity imaging.
Hussain MA; Alam F; Rupa SA; Awwal R; Lee SY; Hasan MK
Ultrasonics; 2014 Jan; 54(1):137-46. PubMed ID: 23806339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Discordant elastography images of breast lesions: how various factors lead to discordant findings.
Yoon JH; Kim MJ; Kim EK; Moon HJ; Choi JS
Ultraschall Med; 2013 Jun; 34(3):266-71. PubMed ID: 22723039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The Journey of Elastography: Background, Current Status, and Future Possibilities in Breast Cancer Diagnosis.
Faruk T; Islam MK; Arefin S; Haq MZ
Clin Breast Cancer; 2015 Oct; 15(5):313-24. PubMed ID: 25858446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
