114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26976470)
1. Implementing context information management in forensic casework: Minimizing contextual bias in firearms examination.
Mattijssen EJ; Kerkhoff W; Berger CE; Dror IE; Stoel RD
Sci Justice; 2016 Mar; 56(2):113-22. PubMed ID: 26976470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of contextual information in forensic toxicology: An international survey of toxicologists' experiences.
Hamnett HJ; Jack RE
Sci Justice; 2019 Jul; 59(4):380-389. PubMed ID: 31256809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The management of domain irrelevant context information in forensic handwriting examination casework.
Found B; Ganas J
Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):154-8. PubMed ID: 23601722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. How Cross-Examination on Subjectivity and Bias Affects Jurors' Evaluations of Forensic Science Evidence.
Thompson WC; Scurich N
J Forensic Sci; 2019 Sep; 64(5):1379-1388. PubMed ID: 30791101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. What do forensic analysts consider relevant to their decision making?
Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Dror IE
Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):516-523. PubMed ID: 31472796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The biasing impact of irrelevant contextual information on forensic odontology radiograph matching decisions.
Chiam SL; Dror IE; Huber CD; Higgins D
Forensic Sci Int; 2021 Oct; 327():110997. PubMed ID: 34536753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Forensic Confirmation Bias: Do Jurors Discount Examiners Who Were Exposed to Task-Irrelevant Information?*
Kukucka J; Hiley A; Kassin SM
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Nov; 65(6):1978-1990. PubMed ID: 32790911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contextual bias on decision-making in forensic toxicology: First survey from China.
He N; Wang L; Hao H
Forensic Sci Int; 2022 Apr; 333():111232. PubMed ID: 35176676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strengthening forensic DNA decision making through a better understanding of the influence of cognitive bias.
Jeanguenat AM; Budowle B; Dror IE
Sci Justice; 2017 Nov; 57(6):415-420. PubMed ID: 29173454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Context Effects in Forensic Entomology and Use of Sequential Unmasking in Casework.
Archer MS; Wallman JF
J Forensic Sci; 2016 Sep; 61(5):1270-7. PubMed ID: 27378533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of cognitive bias, examiner expertise, and stimulus material on forensic evidence analysis.
Pena MM; Stoiloff S; Sparacino M; Schreiber Compo N
J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38922874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contextual bias in forensic toxicology decisions: A follow-up empirical study from China.
He N; Hao H
J Forensic Sci; 2024 Jul; 69(4):1400-1406. PubMed ID: 38567838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A practical tool for information management in forensic decisions: Using Linear Sequential Unmasking-Expanded (LSU-E) in casework.
Quigley-McBride A; Dror IE; Roy T; Garrett BL; Kukucka J
Forensic Sci Int Synerg; 2022; 4():100216. PubMed ID: 35243284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contextual information management: An example of independent-checking in the review of laboratory-based bloodstain pattern analysis.
Osborne NKP; Taylor MC
Sci Justice; 2018 May; 58(3):226-231. PubMed ID: 29685304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A risk-based approach to cognitive bias in forensic science.
Camilleri A; Abarno D; Bird C; Coxon A; Mitchell N; Redman K; Sly N; Wills S; Silenieks E; Simpson E; Lindsay H
Sci Justice; 2019 Sep; 59(5):533-543. PubMed ID: 31472798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessing Cognitive Bias in Forensic Decisions: A Review and Outlook.
Curley LJ; Munro J; Lages M; MacLean R; Murray J
J Forensic Sci; 2020 Mar; 65(2):354-360. PubMed ID: 31693180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cognitive bias in forensic anthropology: visual assessment of skeletal remains is susceptible to confirmation bias.
Nakhaeizadeh S; Dror IE; Morgan RM
Sci Justice; 2014 May; 54(3):208-14. PubMed ID: 24796950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do evidence submission forms expose latent print examiners to task-irrelevant information?
Gardner BO; Kelley S; Murrie DC; Blaisdell KN
Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Apr; 297():236-242. PubMed ID: 30875663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Blind testing in firearms: Preliminary results from a blind quality control program.
Neuman M; Hundl C; Grimaldi A; Eudaley D; Stein D; Stout P
J Forensic Sci; 2022 May; 67(3):964-974. PubMed ID: 35349174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Subjectivity and bias in forensic DNA mixture interpretation.
Dror IE; Hampikian G
Sci Justice; 2011 Dec; 51(4):204-8. PubMed ID: 22137054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
