187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26977074)
1. EVALUATION OF DOSE REDUCTION POTENTIALS OF A NOVEL SCATTER CORRECTION SOFTWARE FOR BEDSIDE CHEST X-RAY IMAGING.
Renger B; Brieskorn C; Toth V; Mentrup D; Jockel S; Lohöfer F; Schwarz M; Rummeny EJ; Noël PB
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):60-7. PubMed ID: 26977074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. ITERATIVE SCATTER CORRECTION FOR GRID-LESS BEDSIDE CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: PERFORMANCE FOR A CHEST PHANTOM.
Mentrup D; Jockel S; Menser B; Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):308-12. PubMed ID: 26487750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Investigating the use of an antiscatter grid in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Avery G; Balcam S; Needler L; Smith A; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Br J Radiol; 2015 Mar; 88(1047):20140613. PubMed ID: 25571914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low dose high energy x-ray in-line phase sensitive imaging prototype: Investigation of optimal geometric conditions and design parameters.
Ghani MU; Yan A; Wong MD; Li Y; Ren L; Wu X; Liu H
J Xray Sci Technol; 2015; 23(6):667-82. PubMed ID: 26756405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Potential Role of Grid-Like Software in Bedside Chest Radiography in Improving Image Quality and Dose Reduction: An Observer Preference Study.
Ahn SY; Chae KJ; Goo JM
Korean J Radiol; 2018; 19(3):526-533. PubMed ID: 29713231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterizing Scatter Correction Software of 5 Mobile Radiography Units: An Anthropomorphic Phantom Study.
Gossye T; Buytaert D; Smeets PV; Morbée L; Vereecke E; Achten E; Bacher K
Invest Radiol; 2022 Jul; 57(7):444-452. PubMed ID: 35085123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Experimental evaluation of fiber-interspaced antiscatter grids for large patient imaging with digital x-ray systems.
Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(16):4863-80. PubMed ID: 17671340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of X-ray scatter correction software on abdomen radiography in terms of image quality and radiation dose.
Sayed M; Knapp KM; Fulford J; Heales C; Alqahtani SJ
Radiography (Lond); 2024 May; 30(4):1125-1135. PubMed ID: 38797045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of Software Parameter Settings on Image Quality of Virtual Grid Processed Radiography Images: A Contrast-Detail Phantom Study.
Gossye T; Smeets PV; Achten E; Bacher K
Invest Radiol; 2020 Jun; 55(6):374-380. PubMed ID: 31985603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of dose reduction potential in scatter-corrected bedside chest radiography using U-net.
Onodera S; Lee Y; Tanaka Y
Radiol Phys Technol; 2020 Dec; 13(4):336-347. PubMed ID: 32986183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Grid removal and impact on population dose in full-field digital mammography.
Gennaro G; Katz L; Souchay H; Klausz R; Alberelli C; di Maggio C
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):547-55. PubMed ID: 17388172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating radiographic parameters for mobile chest computed radiography: phantoms, image quality and effective dose.
Rill LN; Brateman L; Arreola M
Med Phys; 2003 Oct; 30(10):2727-35. PubMed ID: 14596311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. OPTIMIZING IMAGE QUALITY, RADIATION DOSAGE TO THE PATIENT AND TO THE DETECTOR IN PEDIATRIC CHEST RADIOGRAPHY: A PHANTOM STUDY OF A PORTABLE DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEM.
Shahgeldi K; Sjöberg T; Nordström J; Lesanu R; Svahn TM
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 185(4):414-420. PubMed ID: 30916753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Iterative scatter correction for grid-less skeletal radiography allows improved image quality equal to an antiscatter grid in adjunct with dose reduction: a visual grading study of 20 body donors.
Lisson CG; Lisson CS; Kleiner S; Regier M; Beer M; Schmidt SA
Acta Radiol; 2019 Jun; 60(6):735-741. PubMed ID: 30149748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CAN SCATTER CORRECTION SOFTWARE REPLACE A GRID IN DR PELVIC EXAMINATIONS?
Precht H; Mørup SD; Tingberg A; Outzen CB; Kusk KW; Nielsen RM; Midtgård M; Winther MB; Waaler D; Kusk MW
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 31111927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Aspects of radiation protection during chest X-radiography].
Seidenbusch MC; Schneider K
Radiologe; 2015 Jul; 55(7):580-7. PubMed ID: 26195331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A MONTE-CARLO SIMULATION FRAMEWORK FOR JOINT OPTIMISATION OF IMAGE QUALITY AND PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL PAEDIATRIC RADIOGRAPHY.
Menser B; Manke D; Mentrup D; Neitzel U
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Jun; 169(1-4):371-7. PubMed ID: 26628612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of automated CDMAM readings for non-standard CDMAM imaging conditions: grid-less acquisitions and scatter correction.
Binst J; Sterckx B; Bemelmans F; Cockmartin L; Van Peteghem N; Marshall N; Bosmans H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2015 Jul; 165(1-4):350-3. PubMed ID: 25821214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
