These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2697798)

  • 1. [Comparative evaluation of the retentive capacity of endodontic posts].
    Pettini PL; Salamanna S; Galantucci L; Simeone G; Crincoli V
    Minerva Stomatol; 1989 Dec; 38(12):1313-7. PubMed ID: 2697798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Dentinal lesions caused by the use of endodontic posts].
    Pettini P; Salamanna S; Crincoli V; Milano V; Simeone G; Chiarello G
    Minerva Stomatol; 1991 Mar; 40(3):107-15. PubMed ID: 1870545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts.
    Artopoulou II; O'Keefe KL; Powers JM
    J Prosthodont; 2006; 15(3):172-9. PubMed ID: 16681499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A preliminary comparative study of the retentive properties of four post and core systems in etched preparations.
    Gelfand M
    J Can Dent Assoc; 1992 Aug; 58(8):665-6, 669-70. PubMed ID: 1504906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length.
    Nissan J; Dmitry Y; Assif D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Sep; 86(3):304-8. PubMed ID: 11552168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of EDTA conditioning upon the retention of fibre posts luted with resin cements.
    Rasimick BJ; Shah RP; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1101-6. PubMed ID: 19133100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the survival of fibre posts cemented with two different composite resin systems.
    Mehta SB; Millar BJ
    Br Dent J; 2008 Dec; 205(11):E23. PubMed ID: 19029918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Retention of four endodontic posts cemented with composite resin.
    Cohen BI; Pagnillo MK; Newman I; Musikant BL; Deutsch AS
    Gen Dent; 2000; 48(3):320-4. PubMed ID: 11199599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The loading capacity of different pin-post structural systems].
    Köhler C; Tittel S
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1990; 78(4):317-24. PubMed ID: 2146831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparative study of the retentive strength of 6 root posts].
    Charpentier J
    Cah Prothese; 1983 Sep; 11(43):29-38. PubMed ID: 6380661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts.
    Balbosh A; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Mar; 95(3):218-23. PubMed ID: 16543019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars.
    Bolhuis P; de Gee A; Feilzer A
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Sep; 35(8):657-67. PubMed ID: 15366533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Tensile bond strength of cast commercially pure titanium and cast gold-alloy posts and cores cemented with two luting agents.
    Menani LR; Ribeiro RF; Antunes RP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):141-7. PubMed ID: 18262015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of two root canal sealers on the retentive strength of glass fibre endodontic posts.
    Davis ST; O'Connell BC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Jun; 34(6):468-73. PubMed ID: 17518983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An in-vitro comparative study of the retention of grooved and flat endodontic posts in treated root canals using two different types of cements.
    Mohammed AN; Seif RE; Wahbi M
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Oct; 41(4):1463-8. PubMed ID: 9497698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Retention of selected core materials to zirconia posts.
    Edelhoff D; Sorensen JA
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(5):455-61. PubMed ID: 12216563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The retentive effects of pre-fabricated posts by luting cements.
    Sen D; Poyrazoglu E; Tuncelli B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Jun; 31(6):585-9. PubMed ID: 15189317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retention of endodontic dowels: effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design.
    Standlee JP; Caputo AA; Hanson EC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1978 Apr; 39(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 347057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The ideal endodontic posts. A review of the literature].
    Doornbusch H; Vissink A; Huysmans MC
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2003 Mar; 110(3):107-12. PubMed ID: 12680341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Retention of serrated endodontic posts with a composite luting agent: effect of cement thickness.
    Assif D; Bleicher S
    J Prosthet Dent; 1986 Dec; 56(6):689-91. PubMed ID: 3534238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.