These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26978529)

  • 1. Turbulent Kinetic Energy Measurement Using Phase Contrast MRI for Estimating the Post-Stenotic Pressure Drop: In Vitro Validation and Clinical Application.
    Ha H; Kim GB; Kweon J; Huh HK; Lee SJ; Koo HJ; Kang JW; Lim TH; Kim DH; Kim YH; Kim N; Yang DH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151540. PubMed ID: 26978529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Turbulent Kinetic Energy Assessed by Multipoint 4-Dimensional Flow Magnetic Resonance Imaging Provides Additional Information Relative to Echocardiography for the Determination of Aortic Stenosis Severity.
    Binter C; Gotschy A; Sündermann SH; Frank M; Tanner FC; Lüscher TF; Manka R; Kozerke S
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Jun; 10(6):. PubMed ID: 28611119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the limitations of partial Fourier acquisition in phase-contrast MRI of turbulent kinetic energy.
    Walheim J; Gotschy A; Kozerke S
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Jan; 81(1):514-523. PubMed ID: 30265753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Magnetic resonance measurement of turbulent kinetic energy for the estimation of irreversible pressure loss in aortic stenosis.
    Dyverfeldt P; Hope MD; Tseng EE; Saloner D
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 6(1):64-71. PubMed ID: 23328563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Shear-scaling-based approach for irreversible energy loss estimation in stenotic aortic flow - An in vitro study.
    Gülan U; Binter C; Kozerke S; Holzner M
    J Biomech; 2017 May; 56():89-96. PubMed ID: 28342532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. On the accuracy of viscous and turbulent loss quantification in stenotic aortic flow using phase-contrast MRI.
    Binter C; Gülan U; Holzner M; Kozerke S
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Jul; 76(1):191-6. PubMed ID: 26258402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of turbulent kinetic energy using 4D phase-contrast MRI: Effect of scan parameters and target vessel size.
    Ha H; Hwang D; Kim GB; Kweon J; Lee SJ; Baek J; Kim YH; Kim N; Yang DH
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):715-723. PubMed ID: 26968139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro evaluation of flow patterns and turbulent kinetic energy in trans-catheter aortic valve prostheses.
    Giese D; Weiss K; Baeßler B; Madershahian N; Choi YH; Maintz D; Bunck AC
    MAGMA; 2018 Feb; 31(1):165-172. PubMed ID: 28921052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR.
    Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Flores-Arredondo JH; Autry K; Schutt RC; Alvarez PA; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 27184505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In vitro experiments on ICOSA6 4D flow MRI measurement for the quantification of velocity and turbulence parameters.
    Ha H; Park KJ; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T; Yang DH
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 Oct; 72():49-60. PubMed ID: 32619720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simultaneous Doppler/catheter measurements of pressure gradients in aortic valve disease: a correction to the Bernoulli equation based on velocity decay in the stenotic jet.
    VanAuker MD; Hla A; Meisner JS; Strom JA
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 10772051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-invasive cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of pressure recovery distance after aortic valve stenosis.
    Fernandes JF; Gill H; Nio A; Faraci A; Galli V; Marlevi D; Bissell M; Ha H; Rajani R; Mortier P; Myerson SG; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T; Nordsletten DA; Lamata P
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2023 Jan; 25(1):5. PubMed ID: 36717885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bayesian multipoint velocity encoding for concurrent flow and turbulence mapping.
    Binter C; Knobloch V; Manka R; Sigfridsson A; Kozerke S
    Magn Reson Med; 2013 May; 69(5):1337-45. PubMed ID: 22700280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mid-term results of freestyle aortic stentless bioprosthetic valve: clinical impact of quantitative analysis of in-vivo three-dimensional flow velocity profile by magnetic resonance imaging.
    Matsue H; Sawa Y; Matsumiya G; Matsuda H; Hamada S
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Sep; 14(5):630-6. PubMed ID: 16245502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Flow-dependent changes in Doppler-derived aortic valve effective orifice area are real and not due to artifact.
    Kadem L; Rieu R; Dumesnil JG; Durand LG; Pibarot P
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2006 Jan; 47(1):131-7. PubMed ID: 16386676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Validation of pressure drop assessment using 4D flow MRI-based turbulence production in various shapes of aortic stenoses.
    Ha H; Kvitting JP; Dyverfeldt P; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Med; 2019 Feb; 81(2):893-906. PubMed ID: 30252155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MRI phase contrast velocity and flow errors in turbulent stenotic jets.
    O'Brien KR; Cowan BR; Jain M; Stewart RA; Kerr AJ; Young AA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Jul; 28(1):210-8. PubMed ID: 18581344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantification of turbulence and velocity in stenotic flow using spiral three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI.
    Petersson S; Dyverfeldt P; Sigfridsson A; Lantz J; Carlhäll CJ; Ebbers T
    Magn Reson Med; 2016 Mar; 75(3):1249-55. PubMed ID: 25846511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Velocity mapping of the aortic flow at 9.4 T in healthy mice and mice with induced heart failure using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI (4D PC MRI).
    Bovenkamp PR; Brix T; Lindemann F; Holtmeier R; Abdurrachim D; Kuhlmann MT; Strijkers GJ; Stypmann J; Hinrichs KH; Hoerr V
    MAGMA; 2015 Aug; 28(4):315-27. PubMed ID: 25381179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mapping mean and fluctuating velocities by Bayesian multipoint MR velocity encoding-validation against 3D particle tracking velocimetry.
    Knobloch V; Binter C; Gülan U; Sigfridsson A; Holzner M; Lüthi B; Kozerke S
    Magn Reson Med; 2014 Apr; 71(4):1405-15. PubMed ID: 23670993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.