These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

31 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26979067)

  • 1. Assessing the international use of health technology assessments: exploring the merits of different methods when applied to the National Institute of Health Research Health Technology Assessment (NIHR HTA) programme.
    Wright D; Milne R; Price A; Tose N
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2013 Apr; 29(2):192-7. PubMed ID: 23552058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. What is a rapid review? A methodological exploration of rapid reviews in Health Technology Assessments.
    Harker J; Kleijnen J
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2012 Dec; 10(4):397-410. PubMed ID: 23173665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Critical appraisal of systematic reviews on the effect of a history of periodontitis on dental implant loss.
    Faggion CM; Giannakopoulos NN
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 May; 40(5):542-52. PubMed ID: 23557434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of patient reporting of adverse drug reactions to the UK 'Yellow Card Scheme': literature review, descriptive and qualitative analyses, and questionnaire surveys.
    Avery AJ; Anderson C; Bond CM; Fortnum H; Gifford A; Hannaford PC; Hazell L; Krska J; Lee AJ; McLernon DJ; Murphy E; Shakir S; Watson MC
    Health Technol Assess; 2011 May; 15(20):1-234, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 21545758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of network meta-analysis in systematic reviews: a survey of authors.
    Lee AW
    Syst Rev; 2016 Jan; 5():8. PubMed ID: 26791268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. "Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.
    Booth A
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2006 Oct; 94(4):421-9, e205. PubMed ID: 17082834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Trial design and reporting standards for intra-arterial cerebral thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke.
    Higashida RT; Furlan AJ; Roberts H; Tomsick T; Connors B; Barr J; Dillon W; Warach S; Broderick J; Tilley B; Sacks D; ;
    Stroke; 2003 Aug; 34(8):e109-37. PubMed ID: 12869717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.
    Gagnier JJ; Kellam PJ
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2013 Jun; 95(11):e771-7. PubMed ID: 23780547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching.
    Haddaway NR; Collins AM; Coughlin D; Kirk S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138237. PubMed ID: 26379270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Updated method guidelines for cochrane musculoskeletal group systematic reviews and metaanalyses.
    Ghogomu EA; Maxwell LJ; Buchbinder R; Rader T; Pardo Pardo J; Johnston RV; Christensen RD; Rutjes AW; Winzenberg TM; Singh JA; Zanoli G; Wells GA; Tugwell P;
    J Rheumatol; 2014 Feb; 41(2):194-205. PubMed ID: 24293581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews of adverse effects of drug interventions: a survey of their conduct and reporting quality.
    Cornelius VR; Perrio MJ; Shakir SA; Smith LA
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1223-31. PubMed ID: 19757414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic searching for theory to inform systematic reviews: is it feasible? Is it desirable?
    Booth A; Carroll C
    Health Info Libr J; 2015 Sep; 32(3):220-35. PubMed ID: 26095232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Presentational approaches used in the UK for reporting evidence synthesis using indirect and mixed treatment comparisons.
    Tan SH; Bujkiewicz S; Sutton A; Dequen P; Cooper N
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2013 Oct; 18(4):224-32. PubMed ID: 23945680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extending the PRISMA statement to equity-focused systematic reviews (PRISMA-E 2012): explanation and elaboration.
    Welch V; Petticrew M; Petkovic J; Moher D; Waters E; White H; Tugwell P;
    Int J Equity Health; 2015 Oct; 14():92. PubMed ID: 26450828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Beyond "Measure Twice": New Performance Standards in Surgery: Erratum.
    Ann Surg; 2017 Dec; 266(6):e124. PubMed ID: 29140856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Erratum to: Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme.
    Briscoe S
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Mar; 9():169. PubMed ID: 26979067
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Web searching for systematic reviews: a case study of reporting standards in the UK Health Technology Assessment programme.
    Briscoe S
    BMC Res Notes; 2015 Apr; 8():153. PubMed ID: 25889619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 2.