These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26979088)

  • 21. A comparison of speech discrimination scores by using PB-50 lists and the speech discrimination scale with hearing-impaired adults.
    Beykirch HL; Gaeth JH
    J Aud Res; 1978 Jul; 18(3):153-64. PubMed ID: 755810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factors affecting vowel formant discrimination by hearing-impaired listeners.
    Liu C; Kewley-Port D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Nov; 122(5):2855-64. PubMed ID: 18189575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Relations between frequency selectivity, temporal fine-structure processing, and speech reception in impaired hearing.
    Strelcyk O; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3328-45. PubMed ID: 19425674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Speech intelligibility in background noise with ideal binary time-frequency masking.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Apr; 125(4):2336-47. PubMed ID: 19354408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A case material with post lingual severe hearing loss and communication handicap.
    Lundborg T; Agelfors E; Bredberg G; Grubbström B; Holmkvist C; Juhasz E; Lindström B; Malmkvist E; Ranner I; Risberg A; Svärd I
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 18():33-44. PubMed ID: 6577573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users.
    Olsen SØ; Lantz J; Nielsen LH; Brännström KJ
    Int J Audiol; 2012 Sep; 51(9):678-88. PubMed ID: 22731922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
    McShefferty D; Whitmer WM; Akeroyd MA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of cochlear implantation on nasalance of speech in postlingually hearing-impaired adults.
    Hassan SM; Malki KH; Mesallam TA; Farahat M; Bukhari M; Murry T
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):669.e17-22. PubMed ID: 22082866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of the preliminary auditory profile test battery in an international multi-centre study.
    van Esch TE; Kollmeier B; Vormann M; Lyzenga J; Houtgast T; Hällgren M; Larsby B; Athalye SP; Lutman ME; Dreschler WA
    Int J Audiol; 2013 May; 52(5):305-21. PubMed ID: 23570289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Psychological manifestations in a patient with chronic sensory deficits.
    ROBBINS ES; FRIEDHOFF AJ
    Am J Psychiatry; 1959 Feb; 115(8):744-5. PubMed ID: 13617511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Analysis of word perception in deaf children. A longitudinal study].
    Hélias J; Chaurand A; Lafon JC
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1990; 111(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 2281213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Choice of criteria for classifying the forms of hearing loss applicable to the aims of hearing aids].
    Bazarov VG; Moroz BS; Tishchenko NI; Gekht IuK
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1981; (4):21-6. PubMed ID: 7303367
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Hearing outcomes of vestibular schwannoma patients managed with 'wait and scan': predictive value of hearing level at diagnosis.
    Stangerup SE; Tos M; Thomsen J; Caye-Thomasen P
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 May; 124(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 20082740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Environmental noise reduction configuration: Effects on preferences, satisfaction, and speech understanding.
    Zakis JA; Hau J; Blamey PJ
    Int J Audiol; 2009 Dec; 48(12):853-67. PubMed ID: 20017682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Older adults’ performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): Test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods.
    Singh G; Kathleen Pichora-Fuller M
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Oct; 49(10):733-40. PubMed ID: 20874047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Speech perception in children with hearing defects].
    Mládková I; Novák A
    Cas Lek Cesk; 1986 Nov; 125(45):1383-6. PubMed ID: 3779788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multidimensional analysis of speech of hearing impaired children.
    Kotby MN; Wafy WA; Rifaie NA; Abdel-Nasserr NH; Aref EE; Elsharkawy AA
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1996; 42():27-33. PubMed ID: 8668903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Acceptable noise level (ANL) and real-world hearing-aid success in Taiwanese listeners.
    Ho HC; Wu YH; Hsiao SH; Zhang X
    Int J Audiol; 2013 Nov; 52(11):762-70. PubMed ID: 24099584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Classification performances of normal hearing and hard of hearing children].
    Reimann B
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1983; 191(2):181-94. PubMed ID: 6137913
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.