168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26979618)
1. A valid model for predicting responsible nerve roots in lumbar degenerative disease with diagnostic doubt.
Li X; Bai X; Wu Y; Ruan D
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Mar; 17():128. PubMed ID: 26979618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Effectiveness and Safety of Selective Lumbar Decompression in Diagnostic Doubt Patients: A Retrospective Control Study.
Xiaochuan L; Zhong CF; Tang JH; Liang RW; Luo SJ; Huang CM
Pain Physician; 2017 May; 20(4):E541-E550. PubMed ID: 28535563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
Willems P
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of Postoperative Clinical Recovery of Drop Foot Attributable to Lumbar Degenerative Diseases, via a Bayesian Network.
Takenaka S; Aono H
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Mar; 475(3):872-880. PubMed ID: 27913961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [The DIAM spinal stabilisation system to treat degenerative disease of the lumbosacral spine].
Hrabálek L; Machác J; Vaverka M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Oct; 76(5):417-23. PubMed ID: 19912707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Two different fixation methods combined with lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of two-level lumbar vertebra diseases: a clinical comparison study].
Zeng ZY; Wu P; Sun DT; Mao KY; Zhang JQ; Ji JF; Song YX; Han JF; Song GH; Tang HC
Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2015 Oct; 28(10):903-9. PubMed ID: 26727781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Preoperative retrolisthesis as a risk factor of postdecompression lumbar disc herniation.
Takenaka S; Tateishi K; Hosono N; Mukai Y; Fuji T
J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Apr; 24(4):592-601. PubMed ID: 26654340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective analysis of clinical evaluation and self-assessment by patients after decompression surgery for degenerative lumbar canal stenosis.
Haro H; Maekawa S; Hamada Y
Spine J; 2008; 8(2):380-4. PubMed ID: 17433781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patient demographics and MRI-based measurements predict redundant nerve roots in lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective database cohort comparison.
Papavero L; Marques CJ; Lohmann J; Fitting T
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Dec; 19(1):452. PubMed ID: 30579338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Re: Barz T, Melloh M, Staub LP, et al. Nerve root sedimentation sign. Evaluation of a new radiological sign in lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine 2010;35:892–7.
Rawall S; Mohan K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Nov; 35(24):E1359-60; author reply E1360. PubMed ID: 21079494
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical results of intrapedicular partial pediculectomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Ozeki N; Aota Y; Uesugi M; Kaneko K; Mihara H; Niimura T; Saito T
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Jul; 21(5):324-7. PubMed ID: 18600141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability.
McGirt MJ; Sivaganesan A; Asher AL; Devin CJ
Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E13. PubMed ID: 26621411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of rigid vs. dynamic instrumentation for stabilization of the degenerative lumbosacral spine.
Korovessis P; Papazisis Z; Lambiris E
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2002; 91():457-61. PubMed ID: 15457776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Lumbar spinal stenosis: which predictive factors of favorable functional results after decompressive laminectomy?
Foulongne E; Derrey S; Ould Slimane M; Levèque S; Tobenas AC; Dujardin F; Fréger P; Chassagne P; Proust F
Neurochirurgie; 2013 Feb; 59(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 23246374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Functional Outcomes of Therapeutic Selective Nerve Root Block for Single-Segment Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Study.
Xiao S; Zhu S; Guan B; Zhao J
Med Sci Monit; 2024 Jun; 30():e943634. PubMed ID: 38905165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical and radiological outcomes of microscopic partial pediculectomy for degenerative lumbar foraminal stenosis.
Yamada K; Matsuda H; Cho H; Habunaga H; Kono H; Nakamura H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 May; 38(12):E723-31. PubMed ID: 23462578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Neurogenic intermittent claudication in lumbar spinal canal stenosis: the clinical relationship between the local pressure of the intervertebral foramen and the clinical findings in lumbar spinal canal stenosis.
Morishita Y; Hida S; Naito M; Arimizu J; Takamori Y
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Apr; 22(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 19342935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Curve progression after decompression surgery in patients with mild degenerative scoliosis.
Hosogane N; Watanabe K; Kono H; Saito M; Toyama Y; Matsumoto M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Apr; 18(4):321-6. PubMed ID: 23373563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
