These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26980659)

  • 1. [Anatomical and radiographical studies of the bifid mandibular canal].
    Zhang Z; Fan W; Zhang G
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Mar; 51(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 26980659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bifid mandibular canal: confirmation of limited cone beam CT findings by gross anatomical and histological investigations.
    Fukami K; Shiozaki K; Mishima A; Kuribayashi A; Hamada Y; Kobayashi K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2012 Sep; 41(6):460-5. PubMed ID: 22116121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative analysis of mandibular anatomical variations between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography.
    Neves FS; Nascimento MC; Oliveira ML; Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 18(4):419-24. PubMed ID: 23975215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The bifid mandibular canal in three-dimensional radiography: morphologic and quantitative characteristics.
    von Arx T; Bornstein MM
    Swiss Dent J; 2021 Jan; 131(1):10-28. PubMed ID: 33325209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A false presence of bifid mandibular canals in panoramic radiographs.
    Kim MS; Yoon SJ; Park HW; Kang JH; Yang SY; Moon YH; Jung NR; Yoo HI; Oh WM; Kim SH
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2011 Oct; 40(7):434-8. PubMed ID: 21960401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Anatomical variations of mandibular canal detected by panoramic radiography and CT: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Haas LF; Dutra K; Porporatti AL; Mezzomo LA; De Luca Canto G; Flores-Mir C; Corrêa M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(2):20150310. PubMed ID: 26576624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mandibular incisive canal in Han Chinese using cone beam computed tomography.
    Kong N; Hui M; Miao F; Yuan H; Du Y; Chen N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 45(9):1142-6. PubMed ID: 27184354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography.
    Pires CA; Bissada NF; Becker JJ; Kanawati A; Landers MA
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Mar; 14(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 19673957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the visibility and characteristics of the mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography versus panoramic radiography.
    Sahman H; Sekerci AE; Sisman Y; Payveren M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 24451856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Observation of bifid mandibular canal using cone-beam computerized tomography.
    Naitoh M; Hiraiwa Y; Aimiya H; Ariji E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):155-9. PubMed ID: 19344041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prevalence of bifid mandibular canals by cone beam computed tomography.
    Villaça-Carvalho MF; Manhães LR; de Moraes ME; Lopes SL
    Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Sep; 20(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 27417545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Bilateral bifid mandibular canal: a case report using cone beam computed tomography.
    Fuentes R; Farfán C; Astete N; Garay I; Dias F; Arias A
    Folia Morphol (Warsz); 2018; 77(4):780-784. PubMed ID: 29569706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of bifid mandibular canals with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish adult population: a retrospective study.
    Orhan K; Aksoy S; Bilecenoglu B; Sakul BU; Paksoy CS
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2011 Aug; 33(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 21161224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Analysis of bifid mandibular canal via cone beam computed tomography].
    Yi G; Qiaohong Z; Xiaoqian H
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2015 Apr; 33(2):158-60. PubMed ID: 26189232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The comparison of roof visibility of the mandibular canal between cone-beam computed tomography scans and panoramic radiograph images as dependent on the cortical bone thickness of the mandible.
    Ketabi AR; Zelka A; Lauer HC; Hassfeld S
    Int J Implant Dent; 2021 May; 7(1):39. PubMed ID: 34002304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of bifid mandibular canals in the adult population in Sichuan Province].
    Li Y; Yafei C; Jun P; Yuanyuan L; Shuqun Q; Jian P
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 35(1):82-88. PubMed ID: 28326733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Bifid mandibular canal: literature review and case report.
    Claeys V; Wackens G
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 Jan; 34(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 15709108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anatomical variations of the mandibular canal and their clinical implications in dental practice: a literature review.
    Valenzuela-Fuenzalida JJ; Cariseo C; Gold M; Díaz D; Orellana M; Iwanaga J
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Aug; 43(8):1259-1272. PubMed ID: 33630105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. C-shaped canals-prevalence and root canal configuration by cone beam computed tomography evaluation in first and second mandibular molars-a cross-sectional study.
    Shemesh A; Levin A; Katzenell V; Itzhak JB; Levinson O; Avraham Z; Solomonov M
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jul; 21(6):2039-2044. PubMed ID: 27844150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Panoramic radiography in evaluating the relationship of mandibular canal and impacted third molars in comparison with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Ishak MH; Zhun OC; Shaari R; Rahman SA; Hasan MN; Alam MK
    Mymensingh Med J; 2014 Oct; 23(4):781-6. PubMed ID: 25481601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.