198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26980782)
1. An omission procedure reorganizes the microstructure of sign-tracking while preserving incentive salience.
Chang SE; Smith KS
Learn Mem; 2016 Apr; 23(4):151-5. PubMed ID: 26980782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence for a shared representation of sequential cues that engage sign-tracking.
Smedley EB; Smith KS
Behav Processes; 2018 Dec; 157():489-494. PubMed ID: 29933057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Under the influence: Effects of adolescent ethanol exposure and anxiety on motivation for uncertain gambling-like cues in male and female rats.
Hellberg SN; Levit JD; Robinson MJF
Behav Brain Res; 2018 Jan; 337():17-33. PubMed ID: 28958752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Isolating the incentive salience of reward-associated stimuli: value, choice, and persistence.
Beckmann JS; Chow JJ
Learn Mem; 2015 Feb; 22(2):116-27. PubMed ID: 25593298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dynamic Encoding of Incentive Salience in the Ventral Pallidum: Dependence on the Form of the Reward Cue.
Ahrens AM; Ferguson LM; Robinson TE; Aldridge JW
eNeuro; 2018; 5(2):. PubMed ID: 29740595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The sensory features of a food cue influence its ability to act as an incentive stimulus and evoke dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens core.
Singer BF; Bryan MA; Popov P; Scarff R; Carter C; Wright E; Aragona BJ; Robinson TE
Learn Mem; 2016 Nov; 23(11):595-606. PubMed ID: 27918279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The influence of subthalamic nucleus lesions on sign-tracking to stimuli paired with food and drug rewards: facilitation of incentive salience attribution?
Uslaner JM; Dell'Orco JM; Pevzner A; Robinson TE
Neuropsychopharmacology; 2008 Sep; 33(10):2352-61. PubMed ID: 18059435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nucleus accumbens core acetylcholine receptors modulate the balance of flexible and inflexible cue-directed motivation.
Townsend ES; Amaya KA; Smedley EB; Smith KS
Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):13375. PubMed ID: 37591961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nicotinic and muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonism dose-dependently decreases sign- but not goal-tracking behavior in male rats.
Gheidi A; Fitzpatrick CJ; Gregory JD; Morrow JD
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2023 Apr; 240(4):871-880. PubMed ID: 36795109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial uncertainty in Pavlovian reward prediction persistently elevates incentive salience and extends sign-tracking to normally unattractive cues.
Robinson MJ; Anselme P; Fischer AM; Berridge KC
Behav Brain Res; 2014 Jun; 266():119-30. PubMed ID: 24631397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Environmental manipulations alter age differences in attribution of incentive salience to reward-paired cues.
Anderson RI; Bush PC; Spear LP
Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 257():83-9. PubMed ID: 24050888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Which cue to "want?" Central amygdala opioid activation enhances and focuses incentive salience on a prepotent reward cue.
Mahler SV; Berridge KC
J Neurosci; 2009 May; 29(20):6500-13. PubMed ID: 19458221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence of structure and persistence in motivational attraction to serial Pavlovian cues.
Smedley EB; Smith KS
Learn Mem; 2018 Feb; 25(2):78-89. PubMed ID: 29339559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Inadequate early social experience increases the incentive salience of reward-related cues in adulthood.
Lomanowska AM; Lovic V; Rankine MJ; Mooney SJ; Robinson TE; Kraemer GW
Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jun; 220(1):91-9. PubMed ID: 21277909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Amphetamine-induced sensitization and reward uncertainty similarly enhance incentive salience for conditioned cues.
Robinson MJ; Anselme P; Suchomel K; Berridge KC
Behav Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 129(4):502-11. PubMed ID: 26076340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Circuit directionality for motivation: Lateral accumbens-pallidum, but not pallidum-accumbens, connections regulate motivational attraction to reward cues.
Smedley EB; DiLeo A; Smith KS
Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2019 Jul; 162():23-35. PubMed ID: 31096040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dissociating the predictive and incentive motivational properties of reward-related cues through the study of individual differences.
Robinson TE; Flagel SB
Biol Psychiatry; 2009 May; 65(10):869-73. PubMed ID: 18930184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of prior amphetamine exposure on approach strategy in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning in rats.
Simon NW; Mendez IA; Setlow B
Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2009 Mar; 202(4):699-709. PubMed ID: 18850090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Learning not to respond: Role of the hippocampus in withholding responses during omission training.
White NM; Naeem M
Behav Brain Res; 2017 Feb; 318():61-70. PubMed ID: 27838342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Individual differences in anticipatory activity to food rewards predict cue-induced appetitive 50-kHz calls in rats.
Brenes JC; Schwarting RK
Physiol Behav; 2015 Oct; 149():107-18. PubMed ID: 25992480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
