These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26980958)
1. Comparison of specimen adequacy and smear quality in oral smears prepared by manual liquid-based cytology and conventional methods. Shukla S; Einstein A; Shukla A; Mishra D J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2015; 19(3):315-8. PubMed ID: 26980958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative study of manual liquid-based cytology (MLBC) technique and direct smear technique (conventional) on fine-needle cytology/fine-needle aspiration cytology samples. Pawar PS; Gadkari RU; Swami SY; Joshi AR J Cytol; 2014 Apr; 31(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 25210235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of conventional cytology and a low-cost liquid-based cytology technique, EziPREP™, for cervicovaginal smear reporting: A split sample study. Gupta R; Yadav R; Sharda A; Kumar D; Sandeep ; Mehrotra R; Gupta S Cytojournal; 2019; 16():22. PubMed ID: 31803248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Manual liquid based cytology in primary screening for cervical cancer--a cost effective preposition for scarce resource settings. Nandini NM; Nandish SM; Pallavi P; Akshatha SK; Chandrashekhar AP; Anjali S; Dhar M Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2012; 13(8):3645-51. PubMed ID: 23098448 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of manual liquid-based cytology and conventional smears in the evaluation of various fine-needle aspiration samples. Arul P J Cytol; 2016; 33(4):177-181. PubMed ID: 28028330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Liquid-based preparations versus conventional cytology: specimen adequacy and diagnostic agreement in oral lesions. Hayama FH; Motta AC; Silva Ade P; Migliari DA Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2005; 10(2):115-22. PubMed ID: 15735543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Study of a manual method of liquid-based cervical cytology. Kavatkar AN; Nagwanshi CA; Dabak SM Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2008; 51(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 18603678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should Liquid-Based Cytology (LBC) be Preferred than Conventional Pap Smear (CPS): A Comparative Analysis. Andola SK; Andola US; Andola SS; Antony AT; Masgal M; Patil AG; Andola KS J Obstet Gynaecol India; 2024 Aug; 74(4):311-318. PubMed ID: 39280201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Performance and cost analysis of Siriraj liquid-based cytology: a direct-to-vial study. Laiwejpithaya S; Benjapibal M; Laiwejpithaya S; Wongtiraporn W; Sangkarat S; Rattanachaiyanont M Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 19747757 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Value of centrifugated liquid-based cytology by Papanicolaou and May-Grünwald in oral epithelial cells. Ahmed HG; Edris AM; Mohmed EA; Hussein MO Rare Tumors; 2009 Jul; 1(1):e12. PubMed ID: 21139883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Liquid-based versus conventional cytology in solid pediatric neoplasm: Comparison of their diagnostic and morphological spectra. Agarwal P; Yadav S; Kumar A; Goel MM J Cytol; 2016; 33(4):199-204. PubMed ID: 28028334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparison of Conventional Pap Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology for Cervical Cancer Screening. Patel N; Bavikar R; Buch A; Kulkarni M; Dharwadkar A; Viswanathan V Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther; 2023; 12(2):77-82. PubMed ID: 37416097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional cytology for evaluation of cervical Pap smears: experience from the first 1000 split samples. Singh VB; Gupta N; Nijhawan R; Srinivasan R; Suri V; Rajwanshi A Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2015; 58(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 25673585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. SpinThin, a simple, inexpensive technique for preparation of thin-layer cervical cytology from liquid-based specimens: data on 791 cases. Khalbuss WE; Rudomina D; Kauff ND; Chuang L; Melamed MR Cancer; 2000 Jun; 90(3):135-42. PubMed ID: 10896326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A Shandon PapSpin liquid-based gynecological test: A split-sample and direct-to-vial test with histology follow-up study. Rimiene J; Petronyte J; Gudleviciene Z; Smailyte G; Krasauskaite I; Laurinavicius A Cytojournal; 2010 Mar; 7():2. PubMed ID: 20376176 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Has the ThinPrep method of cervical screening maintained its improvement over conventional smears in terms of specimen adequacy? Treacy A; Reynolds J; Kay EW; Leader M; Grace A Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Apr; 37(4):239-40. PubMed ID: 19217033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cell preparation methods and criteria for sample adequacy. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial. McGoogan E; Colgan TJ; Ramzy I; Cochand-Priollet B; Davey DD; Grohs HK; Gurley AM; Husain OA; Hutchinson ML; Knesel EA; Linder J; Mango LJ; Mitchell H; Peebles A; Reith A; Robinowitz M; Sauer T; Shida S; Solomon D; Topalidis T; Wilbur DC; Yamauchi K Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 9479321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of the Efficacy of Sediment Cytology over Oral Brush Cytology in Oral Leukoplakia. Hosmani JV; Pujari VK; Kotrashetti VS; Nayak RS; Babji DV; Patanshetti SM Acta Cytol; 2020; 64(4):368-374. PubMed ID: 31593966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology in the evaluation of abdominal masses. Choudhury M; Pahwa AR Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2020; 63(1):73-77. PubMed ID: 32031126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparative analysis of conventional and SurePath liquid-based cervicovaginal cytology: A study of 140 cases. Sharma J; Toi PCh; Siddaraju N; Sundareshan M; Habeebullah S J Cytol; 2016; 33(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 27279683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]