These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26982251)

  • 1. Fetal Implications of Diagnostic Radiation Exposure During Pregnancy: Evidence-based Recommendations.
    Rimawi BH; Green V; Lindsay M
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 59(2):412-8. PubMed ID: 26982251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Radiation hazards in pregnancy and methods of prevention.
    Needleman S; Powell M
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 May; 33():108-16. PubMed ID: 26577269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pregnancy associated breast cancer.
    Macdonald HR
    Breast J; 2020 Jan; 26(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 31943583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Multidisciplinary approach to breast cancer diagnosed during pregnancy: maternal and neonatal outcomes.
    Córdoba O; Llurba E; Saura C; Rubio I; Ferrer Q; Cortés J; Xercavins J
    Breast; 2013 Aug; 22(4):515-9. PubMed ID: 23116970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pregnancy-associated Breast Cancer.
    Case AS
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Dec; 59(4):779-788. PubMed ID: 27749365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Moseley TW
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 59(2):362-79. PubMed ID: 27101241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer in pregnancy: recommendations of an international consensus meeting.
    Amant F; Deckers S; Van Calsteren K; Loibl S; Halaska M; Brepoels L; Beijnen J; Cardoso F; Gentilini O; Lagae L; Mir O; Neven P; Ottevanger N; Pans S; Peccatori F; Rouzier R; Senn HJ; Struikmans H; Christiaens MR; Cameron D; Du Bois A
    Eur J Cancer; 2010 Dec; 46(18):3158-68. PubMed ID: 20932740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Contrast-enhanced MR-mammography in a pregnant woman with breast carcinoma].
    Hauth E; Umutlu L; Forsting M
    Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1083-4. PubMed ID: 17879180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advancements in Imaging Technology for Detection and Diagnosis of Palpable Breast Masses.
    Jaeger BM; Hong AS; Letter H; Odell MC
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Jun; 59(2):336-50. PubMed ID: 27101239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pregnancy-associated breast cancer: A review of 47 women.
    Taşkın F; Polat Y; Erdoğdu İH; Soyder A
    Clin Imaging; 2019; 58():182-186. PubMed ID: 31404824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of imaging techniques in the diagnosis, staging and choice of therapeutic conduct in pregnancy associated breast cancer.
    Goidescu I; Nemeti G; Caracostea G; Eniu DT; Chiorean A; Pintican R; Cruciat G; Muresan D
    Med Ultrason; 2019 Aug; 21(3):336-343. PubMed ID: 31476214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of low-dose photon-counting contrast-enhanced tomosynthesis with spectral imaging.
    Schmitzberger FF; Fallenberg EM; Lawaczeck R; Hemmendorff M; Moa E; Danielsson M; Bick U; Diekmann S; Pöllinger A; Engelken FJ; Diekmann F
    Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):558-64. PubMed ID: 21330558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Addition of tomosynthesis to conventional digital mammography: effect on image interpretation time of screening examinations.
    Dang PA; Freer PE; Humphrey KL; Halpern EF; Rafferty EA
    Radiology; 2014 Jan; 270(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 24354377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pathological complete response in triple negative poorly differentiated invasive ductal breast carcinoma detected during pregnancy.
    Agrawal G; Chen JH; Baick CH; Chen AE; Mehta RS; Nalcioglu O; Su MY
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Jun; 25(18):2618-20. PubMed ID: 17577043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cancer in pregnancy: fetal and neonatal outcomes.
    Backes CH; Moorehead PA; Nelin LD
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Dec; 54(4):574-90. PubMed ID: 22031248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital Breast Imaging Workflow.
    Odle TG
    Radiol Technol; 2016; 87(3):305M-322M; quiz 323M-326M. PubMed ID: 26721854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [ROC analysis comparing screen film mammography and digital mammography].
    Gaspard-Bakhach S; Dilhuydy MH; Bonichon F; Barreau B; Henriques C; Maugey-Laulom B
    J Radiol; 2000 Feb; 81(2):133-9. PubMed ID: 10705143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unilateral breast hyperplasia in pregnancy simulating neoplasm.
    Skaane P; Skjennald A; Solberg LA
    Br J Radiol; 1987 Apr; 60(712):407-9. PubMed ID: 3555677
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital breast tomosynthesis: initial experience in 98 women with abnormal digital screening mammography.
    Poplack SP; Tosteson TD; Kogel CA; Nagy HM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):616-23. PubMed ID: 17715109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Digital mammography: novel applications.
    Rafferty EA
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2007 Sep; 45(5):831-43, vii. PubMed ID: 17888772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.