These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2698277)

  • 1. [Prediction of fetal hypoxia using the fetal biophysical profile].
    Urbánková E; Toldy M
    Cesk Gynekol; 1989 Dec; 54(10):733-9. PubMed ID: 2698277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Fetal biophysical profile and perinatal death.
    Baskett TF; Allen AC; Gray JH; Young DC; Young LM
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Sep; 70(3 Pt 1):357-60. PubMed ID: 3306498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Biophysical profile in prolonged pregnancy. Another alternative to fetal monitoring].
    Jiménez Solis G; Izquierdo Puente JC; Barraza Espinoza RM; Sánchez Tenorio E; García Alonso A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1990 Oct; 58():284-8. PubMed ID: 2292430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Biophysical profile in prolonged pregnancy. Another alternative of fetal surveillance].
    Jiménez Solis G; Izquierdo Puente JC; Barraza Espinoza RM; Sánchez Tenorio E; García Alonso A
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1990 Oct; 58():284-8. PubMed ID: 2101378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Value of the fetal biophysical profile in intensive monitoring of high risk pregnancy].
    Marković A; Antić D; Dukić M; Rajković V
    Jugosl Ginekol Perinatol; 1990; 30(5-6):133-6. PubMed ID: 2094794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perinatal outcome with the modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Jun; 170(6):1672-6. PubMed ID: 8203424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A prospective trial of the fetal biophysical profile versus the nonstress test in the management of high-risk pregnancies.
    Platt LD; Walla CA; Paul RH; Trujillo ME; Loesser CV; Jacobs ND; Broussard PM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 153(6):624-33. PubMed ID: 4061530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Antenatal fetal assessment using biophysical profile score.
    Begum F; Buckshee K; Pande JN
    Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 1996 Aug; 22(2):51-9. PubMed ID: 9103656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Further experience with the fetal biophysical profile.
    Platt LD; Eglinton GS; Sipos L; Broussard PM; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Apr; 61(4):480-5. PubMed ID: 6681892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The value of a negative antepartum test: contraction stress test and modified biophysical profile.
    Nageotte MP; Towers CV; Asrat T; Freeman RK; Dorchester W
    Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Aug; 84(2):231-4. PubMed ID: 8041536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Middle cerebral/umbilical artery resistance index ratio as sensitive parameter for fetal well-being and neonatal outcome in patients with preeclampsia: case-control study.
    Ebrashy A; Azmy O; Ibrahim M; Waly M; Edris A
    Croat Med J; 2005 Oct; 46(5):821-5. PubMed ID: 16158478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contraction stress test versus ductus venosus Doppler evaluation for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses with non-reassuring non-stress test.
    Figueras F; Martínez JM; Puerto B; Coll O; Cararach V; Vanrell JA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12666219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relationship between fetal biophysical profile and cord pH in patients undergoing cesarean section before the onset of labor.
    Vintzileos AM; Gaffney SE; Salinger LM; Campbell WA; Nochimson DJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Aug; 70(2):196-201. PubMed ID: 3601282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perinatal outcome associated with oligohydramnios in uncomplicated term pregnancies.
    Locatelli A; Vergani P; Toso L; Verderio M; Pezzullo JC; Ghidini A
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jan; 269(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 12928935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fetal biophysical profile score and the nonstress test: a comparative trial.
    Manning FA; Lange IR; Morrison I; Harman CR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Sep; 64(3):326-31. PubMed ID: 6379529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Diagnosis of biophysical status in pregnancy].
    Heinrich J; Radmann D
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1988; 110(24):1537-45. PubMed ID: 3066063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The fetal biophysical profile score: current status.
    Manning FA
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 1990 Mar; 17(1):147-62. PubMed ID: 2192316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of fetal well-being using a modified Doppler flowmetric profile].
    Romero Gutiérrez G; Vargas Origel A; Zamora Orozco J; Alvarado López MR
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2000 Sep; 68():371-80. PubMed ID: 11080943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of current antepartum fetal tests.
    Tannirandorn Y; Uerpairojkit B; Phaosavasdi S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1995 Jan; 78(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 7622974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can asphyxiated infants at risk for neonatal seizures be rapidly identified by current high-risk markers?
    Perlman JM; Risser R
    Pediatrics; 1996 Apr; 97(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 8632928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.