These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26983760)

  • 21. Clinical utility of pressure feedback to socket design and fabrication.
    Armitage L; Buller A; Rajan G; Prusty G; Simmons A; Kark L
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2020 Feb; 44(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 31769736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Interface pressure profile analysis for patellar tendon-bearing socket and hydrostatic socket.
    Moo EK; Osman NA; Pingguan-Murphy B; Abas WA; Spence WD; Solomonidis SE
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2009; 11(4):37-43. PubMed ID: 20405814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of the effects of patellar tendon bearing and total surface bearing sockets on prosthetic fitting and rehabilitation.
    Yiğiter K; Sener G; Bayar K
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2002 Dec; 26(3):206-12. PubMed ID: 12562067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Mapping Lower-Limb Prosthesis Load Distributions Using a Low-Cost Pressure Measurement System.
    Hopkins MO; Turner S; Vaidyanathan R; McGregor A
    Front Med Technol; 2022; 4():908002. PubMed ID: 35782578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The patellar tendon bar! Is it a necessary feature?
    Abu Osman NA; Spence WD; Solomonidis SE; Paul JP; Weir AM
    Med Eng Phys; 2010 Sep; 32(7):760-5. PubMed ID: 20678997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Characterization of interfacial socket pressure in transhumeral prostheses: A case series.
    Schofield JS; Schoepp KR; Williams HE; Carey JP; Marasco PD; Hebert JS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0178517. PubMed ID: 28575012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Pilot study: data-capturing consistency of two trans-tibial casting concepts, using a manikin stump model: a comparison between the hands-on PTB and hands-off ICECAST compact concepts.
    Buis AW; Blair A; Convery P; Sockalingam S; McHugh B
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2003 Aug; 27(2):100-6. PubMed ID: 14571939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Interface load analysis for computer-aided design of below-knee prosthetic sockets.
    Reynolds DP; Lord M
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 1992 Jul; 30(4):419-26. PubMed ID: 1487943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Vertical alignment axis for transtibial prostheses: a simplified alignment method.
    Lin MC; Wu YC; Edwards M
    J Formos Med Assoc; 2000 Jan; 99(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 10743345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Patellar tendon morphology in trans-tibial amputees utilizing a prosthesis with a patellar-tendon-bearing feature.
    Ho KY; Harty M; Kellogg J; Teter K; Lee SP; Chang YJ; Bashford G
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16392. PubMed ID: 31704989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A motor-driven adjustable prosthetic socket operated using a mobile phone app: A technical note.
    Sanders JE; Garbini JL; McLean JB; Hinrichs P; Predmore TJ; Brzostowski JT; Redd CB; Cagle JC
    Med Eng Phys; 2019 Jun; 68():94-100. PubMed ID: 31028009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Influence of malalignment on socket reaction moments during gait in amputees with transtibial prostheses.
    Boone DA; Kobayashi T; Chou TG; Arabian AK; Coleman KL; Orendurff MS; Zhang M
    Gait Posture; 2013 Apr; 37(4):620-6. PubMed ID: 23177920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Finite element modeling of the contact interface between trans-tibial residual limb and prosthetic socket.
    Lee WC; Zhang M; Jia X; Cheung JT
    Med Eng Phys; 2004 Oct; 26(8):655-62. PubMed ID: 15471693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The use of an adjustable electrode housing unit to compare electrode alignment and contact variation with myoelectric prosthesis functionality: A pilot study.
    Head JS; Howard D; Hutchins SW; Kenney L; Heath GH; Aksenov AY
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2016 Feb; 40(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 25134531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Advanced trans-tibial socket fabrication using selective laser sintering.
    Rogers B; Bosker GW; Crawford RH; Faustini MC; Neptune RR; Walden G; Gitter AJ
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2007 Mar; 31(1):88-100. PubMed ID: 17365888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of Dermo and Seal-In X5 prosthetic liners on pressure distributions and reported satisfaction during ramp ambulation in persons with transtibial limb loss.
    Ali S; Osman NA; Razak A; Hussain S; Wan Abas WA
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2015 Feb; 51(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 24963603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dynamic alignment of transtibial prostheses through visualization of socket reaction moments.
    Kobayashi T; Orendurff MS; Boone DA
    Prosthet Orthot Int; 2015 Dec; 39(6):512-6. PubMed ID: 25121726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Progress Toward Optimizing Prosthetic Socket Fit and Suspension Using Elevated Vacuum to Promote Residual Limb Health.
    Wernke MM; Schroeder RM; Haynes ML; Nolt LL; Albury AW; Colvin JM
    Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle); 2017 Jul; 6(7):233-239. PubMed ID: 28736683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of transtibial prosthesis alignment changes on out-of-plane socket reaction moments during walking in amputees.
    Kobayashi T; Orendurff MS; Zhang M; Boone DA
    J Biomech; 2012 Oct; 45(15):2603-9. PubMed ID: 22975295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Instrumented socket inserts for sensing interaction at the limb-socket interface.
    Swanson EC; McLean JB; Allyn KJ; Redd CB; Sanders JE
    Med Eng Phys; 2018 Jan; 51():111-118. PubMed ID: 29229405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.