179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26984824)
1. Magnetic permeability as a predictor of the artefact size caused by orthodontic appliances at 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging.
Blankenstein FH; Asbach P; Beuer F; Glienke J; Mayer S; Zachriat C
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Jan; 21(1):281-289. PubMed ID: 26984824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. MRI with intraoral orthodontic appliance-a comparative in vitro and in vivo study of image artefacts at 1.5 T.
Zachriat C; Asbach P; Blankenstein KI; Peroz I; Blankenstein FH
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(6):20140416. PubMed ID: 25734243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments.
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Feb; 37(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 24997025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts and fixed orthodontic attachments].
Beau A; Bossard D; Gebeile-Chauty S
Orthod Fr; 2017 Jun; 88(2):131-138. PubMed ID: 28597834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of orthodontic appliances on the quality of craniofacial anatomical magnetic resonance imaging and real-time speech imaging.
Wylezinska M; Pinkstone M; Hay N; Scott AD; Birch MJ; Miquel ME
Eur J Orthod; 2015 Dec; 37(6):610-7. PubMed ID: 25667040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predictability of magnetic susceptibility artifacts from metallic orthodontic appliances in magnetic resonance imaging.
Blankenstein F; Truong BT; Thomas A; Thieme N; Zachriat C
J Orofac Orthop; 2015 Jan; 76(1):14-29. PubMed ID: 25420942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of magnetic resonance images of the head.
Zhylich D; Krishnan P; Muthusami P; Rayner T; Shroff M; Doria A; Tompson B; Lou W; Suri S
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):484-499. PubMed ID: 28257733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic capability of magnetic resonance imaging in the head and neck region: A systematic review.
Hasanin M; Kaplan SEF; Hohlen B; Lai C; Nagshabandi R; Zhu X; Al-Jewair T
Int Orthod; 2019 Sep; 17(3):403-414. PubMed ID: 31285157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orthodontic appliances and MR image artefacts: An exploratory in vitro and in vivo study using 1.5-T and 3-T scanners.
Sonesson M; Al-Qabandi F; Månsson S; Abdulraheem S; Bondemark L; Hellén-Halme K
Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Mar; 51(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 33828963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artefacts in hip prostheses: a comparison of different prosthetic compositions.
Panfili E; Pierdicca L; Salvolini L; Imperiale L; Dubbini J; Giovagnoni A
Radiol Med; 2014 Feb; 119(2):113-20. PubMed ID: 24297575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of pulse sequence parameters at 1.5 T and 3.0 T on MRI artefacts produced by metal-ceramic restorations.
Cortes AR; Abdala-Junior R; Weber M; Arita ES; Ackerman JL
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(8):20150136. PubMed ID: 26084475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A standardized evaluation of artefacts from metallic compounds during fast MR imaging.
Murakami S; Verdonschot RG; Kataoka M; Kakimoto N; Shimamoto H; Kreiborg S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016 Oct; 45(8):20160094. PubMed ID: 27459058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Magnetic resonance imaging artefacts caused by orthodontic appliances and/or implant-supported prosthesis: a systematic review.
Johannsen KM; de Carvalho E Silva Fuglsig JM; Hansen B; Wenzel A; Spin-Neto R
Oral Radiol; 2023 Apr; 39(2):394-407. PubMed ID: 36178613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of orthodontic appliance-derived artifacts on 3-T MRI movies.
Ozawa E; Honda EI; Parakonthun KN; Ohmori H; Shimazaki K; Kurabayashi T; Ono T
Prog Orthod; 2018 Feb; 19(1):7. PubMed ID: 29457192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of common orthodontic appliances on the diagnostic quality of cranial magnetic resonance images.
Elison JM; Leggitt VL; Thomson M; Oyoyo U; Wycliffe ND
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Oct; 134(4):563-72. PubMed ID: 18929275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three-dimensional ultrashort echo magnetic resonance imaging of orthodontic appliances in the natural dentition.
Cox RJ; Kau CH; Rasche V
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):552-61. PubMed ID: 22999679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI artefact in the rectum caused by ingested orthodontic brackets.
Almuqbel MM; Leeper GJ; Petelo JF; Page TJ; Melzer TR
Radiography (Lond); 2018 May; 24(2):e48-e50. PubMed ID: 29605125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Signal loss in magnetic resonance imaging caused by intraoral anchored dental magnetic materials].
Blankenstein FH; Truong B; Thomas A; Schröder RJ; Naumann M
Rofo; 2006 Aug; 178(8):787-93. PubMed ID: 16862505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Artefacts and ferromagnetism dependent on different metal alloys in magnetic resonance imaging. An experimental study].
Thomsen M; Schneider U; Breusch SJ; Hansmann J; Freund M
Orthopade; 2001 Aug; 30(8):540-4. PubMed ID: 11552395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induced magnetic moment in stainless steel components of orthodontic appliances in 1.5 T MRI scanners.
Wang ZJ; Rollins NK; Liang H; Park YJ
Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5871-8. PubMed ID: 26429261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
