179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26984824)
21. Metal artefact reduction in MRI at both 1.5 and 3.0 T using slice encoding for metal artefact correction and view angle tilting.
Reichert M; Ai T; Morelli JN; Nittka M; Attenberger U; Runge VM
Br J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 88(1048):20140601. PubMed ID: 25613398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. MRI susceptibility artefacts caused by orthodontic wire.
Iwamoto Y; Shimamoto H; Felemban D; Terai T; Kreiborg S; Mallya SM; Gloria Yang FP; Tanikawa C; Murakami S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38870528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The intraoral permeability measurement as a screening for artifact formation by orthodontic products in MRI.
Blankenstein FH; Kielburg U; Melerowitz L; Stelmaszczyk D
J Orofac Orthop; 2023 Jul; 84(4):252-263. PubMed ID: 34738142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Radiofrequency-induced heating near fixed orthodontic appliances in high field MRI systems at 3.0 Tesla.
Regier M; Kemper J; Kaul MG; Feddersen M; Adam G; Kahl-Nieke B; Klocke A
J Orofac Orthop; 2009 Nov; 70(6):485-94. PubMed ID: 19960291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of receiver bandwidth on MRI artifacts caused by orthodontic brackets composed of different alloys.
Abdala-Junior R; No-Cortes J; Arita ES; Ackerman JL; da Silva RLB; Kim JH; Cortes ARG
Imaging Sci Dent; 2021 Dec; 51(4):413-419. PubMed ID: 34988002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. In vivo assessment of artefacts in MRI images caused by conventional twistflex and various fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers.
Roser CJ; Hilgenfeld T; Saleem MA; Rückschloß T; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Lux CJ; Juerchott A
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Jul; 85(4):279-288. PubMed ID: 36700953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analysing the effects of metallic biomaterial design and imaging sequences on MRI interpretation challenges due to image artefacts.
Akdogan G; Istanbullu OB
Phys Eng Sci Med; 2022 Dec; 45(4):1163-1174. PubMed ID: 36306073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Magnetic susceptibility and electrical conductivity of metallic dental materials and their impact on MR imaging artifacts.
Starcuková J; Starcuk Z; Hubálková H; Linetskiy I
Dent Mater; 2008 Jun; 24(6):715-23. PubMed ID: 17884157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Reference layer artefact subtraction (RLAS): a novel method of minimizing EEG artefacts during simultaneous fMRI.
Chowdhury ME; Mullinger KJ; Glover P; Bowtell R
Neuroimage; 2014 Jan; 84():307-19. PubMed ID: 23994127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The effect of metallic dental restorations and implants in causing patient discomfort and artefacts during magnetic resonance imaging of the head and neck.
Ashok A; Ayyadanveettil P; Devarajan E; Thavakkara V; Latha N; Saraswathy A
Indian J Dent Res; 2022; 33(3):258-262. PubMed ID: 36656184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [Orthodontic brackets in high field MR imaging: experimental evaluation of magnetic field interactions at 3.0 Tesla].
Kemper J; Klocke A; Kahl-Nieke B; Adam G
Rofo; 2005 Dec; 177(12):1691-8. PubMed ID: 16333793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Should the orthodontic brackets always be removed prior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)?
Poorsattar-Bejeh Mir A; Rahmati-Kamel M
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res; 2016; 6(2):142-52. PubMed ID: 27195213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging artifacts caused by fixed orthodontic CAD/CAM retainers-an in vitro study.
Roser C; Hilgenfeld T; Sen S; Badrow T; Zingler S; Heiland S; Bendszus M; Lux CJ; Juerchott A
Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Mar; 25(3):1423-1431. PubMed ID: 32785849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of the temporomandibular joint in patients with orthodontic appliances.
Okano Y; Yamashiro M; Kaneda T; Kasai K
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):255-63. PubMed ID: 12582369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging-compatible needles and interactive sequences for musculoskeletal interventions using an open high-field magnetic resonance imaging scanner.
Wonneberger U; Schnackenburg B; Streitparth F; Walter T; Rump J; Teichgräber UK
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2010 Apr; 33(2):346-51. PubMed ID: 19705200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Quantification of susceptibility artifacts produced on high-field magnetic resonance images by various biomaterials used for neurosurgical implants. Technical note.
Matsuura H; Inoue T; Konno H; Sasaki M; Ogasawara K; Ogawa A
J Neurosurg; 2002 Dec; 97(6):1472-5. PubMed ID: 12507151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Salivary Electrolytes in Patients with Metallic and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets.
Jurela A; Verzak Ž; Brailo V; Škrinjar I; Sudarević K; Janković B
Acta Stomatol Croat; 2018 Mar; 52(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 30034002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Evaluation and reduction of magnetic resonance imaging artefacts induced by distinct plates for osseous fixation: an in vitro study @ 3 T.
Rendenbach C; Schoellchen M; Bueschel J; Gauer T; Sedlacik J; Kutzner D; Vallittu PK; Heiland M; Smeets R; Fiehler J; Siemonsen S
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2018 Oct; 47(7):20170361. PubMed ID: 29718688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Quantitative evaluation of artefact reduction from metallic dental materials in short tau inversion recovery imaging: efficacy of
Tran LTX; Sakamoto J; Kuribayashi A; Watanabe H; Tomisato H; Kurabayashi T
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2019 Oct; 48(7):20190036. PubMed ID: 31188678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Attractiveness, acceptability, and value of orthodontic appliances.
Rosvall MD; Fields HW; Ziuchkovski J; Rosenstiel SF; Johnston WM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Mar; 135(3):276.e1-12; discussion 276-7. PubMed ID: 19268820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
