148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26985881)
1. The influence of retrieval practice on metacognition: The contribution of analytic and non-analytic processes.
Miller TM; Geraci L
Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():41-50. PubMed ID: 26985881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Improving metacognitive accuracy: how failing to retrieve practice items reduces overconfidence.
Miller TM; Geraci L
Conscious Cogn; 2014 Oct; 29():131-40. PubMed ID: 25286123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Making Retrospective Confidence Judgments Improves Learners' Ability to Decide What Not to Study.
Robey AM; Dougherty MR; Buttaccio DR
Psychol Sci; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1683-1693. PubMed ID: 28934588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy of learners' testing choices.
Tullis JG; Fiechter JL; Benjamin AS
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 Apr; 44(4):540-552. PubMed ID: 29094989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Metamemory monitoring and control following retrieval practice for text.
Little JL; McDaniel MA
Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):85-98. PubMed ID: 25135813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Metacognitive control in self-regulated learning: Conditions affecting the choice of restudying versus retrieval practice.
Toppino TC; LaVan MH; Iaconelli RT
Mem Cognit; 2018 Oct; 46(7):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 29845590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intuition and metacognition: The effect of semantic coherence on judgments of learning.
Undorf M; Zander T
Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Aug; 24(4):1217-1224. PubMed ID: 27815819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Metacognitive control over the distribution of retrieval practice with and without feedback and the efficacy of learners' spacing choices.
Toppino TC; Pagano MJ
Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):467-479. PubMed ID: 33006078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reverse inference of memory retrieval processes underlying metacognitive monitoring of learning using multivariate pattern analysis.
Stiers P; Falbo L; Goulas A; van Gog T; de Bruin A
Neuroimage; 2016 May; 132():11-23. PubMed ID: 26883066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cue generation: How learners flexibly support future retrieval.
Tullis JG; Benjamin AS
Mem Cognit; 2015 Aug; 43(6):922-38. PubMed ID: 25777138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Do learners predict a shift from recency to primacy with delay?
Storm BC; Bjork RA
Mem Cognit; 2016 Nov; 44(8):1204-1214. PubMed ID: 27380499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evidence of a metacognitive benefit to memory?
Hollins TJ; Weber N
Memory; 2017 Mar; 25(3):317-325. PubMed ID: 27050770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Retrieval practice can eliminate list method directed forgetting.
Abel M; Bäuml KH
Mem Cognit; 2016 Jan; 44(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 26286882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When asking the question changes the ultimate answer: Metamemory judgments change memory.
Mitchum AL; Kelley CM; Fox MC
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2016 Feb; 145(2):200-19. PubMed ID: 27045282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Confidence in accuracy moderates the benefits of retrieval practice.
Zhang M; Chen X; Liu XL
Memory; 2019 Apr; 27(4):548-554. PubMed ID: 30295147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval.
Thomas RC; McDaniel MA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):437-50. PubMed ID: 22732026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrieval practice: a simple strategy for improving memory after traumatic brain injury.
Sumowski JF; Wood HG; Chiaravalloti N; Wylie GR; Lengenfelder J; DeLuca J
J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2010 Nov; 16(6):1147-50. PubMed ID: 20946709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Why do learners ignore expected feedback in making metacognitive decisions about retrieval practice?
Toppino TC; Heslin KA; Curley TM; Jackiewicz MK; Flowers CS; Phelan HA
Mem Cognit; 2021 Oct; 49(7):1423-1435. PubMed ID: 33770397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving encoding strategies as a function of test knowledge and experience.
Storm BC; Hickman ML; Bjork EL
Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):660-70. PubMed ID: 26822535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fluency of retrieval at study affects judgments of learning (JOLs): an analytic or nonanalytic basis for JOLs?
Matvey G; Dunlosky J; Guttentag R
Mem Cognit; 2001 Mar; 29(2):222-33. PubMed ID: 11352205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
