These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26986458)

  • 1. Quality of search strategies reported in systematic reviews published in stereotactic radiosurgery.
    Faggion CM; Wu YC; Tu YK; Wasiak J
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20150878. PubMed ID: 26986458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Search strategies in systematic reviews in periodontology and implant dentistry.
    Faggion CM; Atieh MA; Park S
    J Clin Periodontol; 2013 Sep; 40(9):883-8. PubMed ID: 23834263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification of problems in search strategies in Cochrane Reviews.
    Franco JVA; Garrote VL; Escobar Liquitay CM; Vietto V
    Res Synth Methods; 2018 Sep; 9(3):408-416. PubMed ID: 29761662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases.
    Song F; Parekh S; Hooper L; Loke YK; Ryder J; Sutton AJ; Hing C; Kwok CS; Pang C; Harvey I
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Feb; 14(8):iii, ix-xi, 1-193. PubMed ID: 20181324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Critical Assessment of Search Strategies in Systematic Reviews in Endodontics.
    Yaylali IE; Alaçam T
    J Endod; 2016 Jun; 42(6):854-60. PubMed ID: 27071976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Ma B; Qi GQ; Lin XT; Wang T; Chen ZM; Yang KH
    J Altern Complement Med; 2012 Sep; 18(9):813-7. PubMed ID: 22924413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines.
    Toews LC
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2017 Jul; 105(3):233-239. PubMed ID: 28670210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews on tuberculosis.
    Nicolau I; Ling D; Tian L; Lienhardt C; Pai M
    Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2013 Sep; 17(9):1160-9. PubMed ID: 23809432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Compliance of systematic reviews in ophthalmology with the PRISMA statement.
    Lee SY; Sagoo H; Farwana R; Whitehurst K; Fowler A; Agha R
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):178. PubMed ID: 29281981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reporting of the methodological quality of search strategies in orthodontic quantitative systematic reviews.
    AlMubarak D; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
    Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):551-556. PubMed ID: 33367640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is the evaluation of risk of bias in periodontology and implant dentistry comprehensive? A systematic review.
    Faggion CM; Listl S; Alarcón MA
    J Clin Periodontol; 2015 May; 42(5):488-94. PubMed ID: 25809114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Recommendations for reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of diagnostic test accuracy: a systematic review.
    McGrath TA; Alabousi M; Skidmore B; Korevaar DA; Bossuyt PMM; Moher D; Thombs B; McInnes MDF
    Syst Rev; 2017 Oct; 6(1):194. PubMed ID: 29017574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality of Literature Searches Published in Leading Neurosurgical Journals: A Review of Reviews.
    O'Donohoe TJ; Bridson TL; Shafik CG; Wynne D; Dhillon RS; Tee JW
    Neurosurgery; 2021 Apr; 88(5):891-899. PubMed ID: 33503659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of information sources used in Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews: A case study in the field of anesthesiology and pain.
    Biocic M; Fidahic M; Cikes K; Puljak L
    Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):597-605. PubMed ID: 31393677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of publication bias required improvement in oral health systematic reviews.
    Koletsi D; Valla K; Fleming PS; Chaimani A; Pandis N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():118-24. PubMed ID: 26939926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Time relevance, citation of reporting guidelines, and breadth of literature search in systematic reviews in orthodontics.
    Livas C; Pandis N; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2015 Apr; 37(2):183-7. PubMed ID: 25052374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.
    Zhang J; Wang J; Han L; Zhang F; Cao J; Ma Y
    Nurs Outlook; 2015; 63(4):446-455.e4. PubMed ID: 26187084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
    Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perspective on Systematic Medical Literature Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
    Pepose JS; Foulks GN; Nelson JD; Erickson S; Lemp MA
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2020 Mar; 211():15-21. PubMed ID: 31811861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.