174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2698744)
1. Assessment of digital chest radiography using stimulable phosphor.
Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Andersson B; Lárusdóttir H; Lundin A; Pettersson H
Acta Radiol; 1989; 30(6):581-6. PubMed ID: 2698744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of digital radiography using stimulable phosphor for diagnosis of pneumothorax.
Kehler M; Albrechtsson U; Andrésdóttir A; Lárusdóttir H; Lundin A
Acta Radiol; 1990 Jan; 31(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 2187511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chest radiography: depiction of normal anatomy and pathologic structures with selenium-based digital radiography versus conventional screen-film radiography.
Woodard PK; Slone RM; Gierada DS; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
Radiology; 1997 Apr; 203(1):197-201. PubMed ID: 9122392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visibility of normal thoracic anatomic landmarks on storage phosphor digital radiography versus conventional radiography.
Konen E; Greenberg I; Rozenman J
Isr Med Assoc J; 2005 Aug; 7(8):495-7. PubMed ID: 16106773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interpretation of subtle interstitial chest abnormalities: conventional radiography versus high-resolution storage-phosphor radiography--a preliminary study.
Ikezoe J; Kohno N; Kido S; Takeuchi N; Johkoh T; Arisawa J; Kozuka T
J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):31-6. PubMed ID: 7734537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of CT-proved pulmonary nodules: comparison of selenium-based digital and conventional screen-film chest radiographs.
Woodard PK; Slone RM; Sagel SS; Fleishman MJ; Gutierrez FR; Reiker GG; Pilgram TK; Jost RG
Radiology; 1998 Dec; 209(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 9844662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Experiences with digital luminescence radiography (DLR) in pediatric radiology].
Vosshenrich R; Weigel W; Fischer U; Funke M; Grabbe E
Rofo; 1992 Feb; 156(2):107-11. PubMed ID: 1739766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
Miceli M; Stamati R; Burci P; Sartoni Galloni S; Guidarelli G; Pastori R
Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Digital radiography of the chest in pediatric patients].
Puig S
Radiologe; 2003 Dec; 43(12):1045-50. PubMed ID: 14668992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
Busch HP
Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [New analog and digital imaging techniques for chest diagnosis--principles--clinical value--economics].
Busch HP; Lehmann KJ; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 8448232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with Film Digital Radiography System.
Goodman LR; Foley WD; Wilson CR; Rimm AA; Lawson TL
Radiology; 1986 Jan; 158(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 3940392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved chest disease detection with scanning equalization radiography.
Wandtke JC; Plewes DB
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1985 Nov; 145(5):979-83. PubMed ID: 3876756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy of digital radiography for the detection of pneumothorax: comparison with conventional chest radiography.
Elam EA; Rehm K; Hillman BJ; Maloney K; Fajardo LL; McNeill K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):509-14. PubMed ID: 1738985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [High intensification film-screen systems in thoracic diagnosis. A clinical comparative study].
Schäfer CB; Sokiranski R; Claussen CD
Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Nov; 5(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 8580141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Chest radiographic image quality: comparison of asymmetric screen-film, digital storage phosphor, and digital selenium drum systems--preliminary study.
Beute GH; Flynn MJ; Eyler WR; Samei E; Spizarny DL; Zylak CJ
Radiographics; 1998; 18(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 9599395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Digital chest x-rays with a selenium detector: a prospective comparison with a conventional film-screen combination].
Freund M; Reuter M; Palmié S; Harder E; Hutzelmann A; Heller M
Rofo; 1997 Feb; 166(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9116250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [New imaging methods in thoracic diagnosis. A study to evaluate digital storage screen radiography, the slit technique ("AMBER"), asymmetric ("InSight") and conventional film-screen techniques].
Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Drescher P; Loose R; Georgi M
Aktuelle Radiol; 1993 Jan; 3(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 8448224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Selenium-based digital radiography of the chest: radiologists' preference compared with film-screen radiographs.
Floyd CE; Baker JA; Chotas HG; Delong DM; Ravin CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1353-8. PubMed ID: 7484562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
