These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26987560)

  • 21. The time course of conflict on the Cognitive Reflection Test.
    Travers E; Rolison JJ; Feeney A
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():109-18. PubMed ID: 26896724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Cognitive flexibility in young children: General or task-specific capacity?
    Deák GO; Wiseheart M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2015 Oct; 138():31-53. PubMed ID: 26026421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Individual differences in working memory capacity determine the effects of oculomotor task load on concurrent word recall performance.
    Lee EJ; Kwon G; Lee A; Ghajar J; Suh M
    Brain Res; 2011 Jul; 1399():59-65. PubMed ID: 21645879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Learning Efficiency: Identifying Individual Differences in Learning Rate and Retention in Healthy Adults.
    Zerr CL; Berg JJ; Nelson SM; Fishell AK; Savalia NK; McDermott KB
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Sep; 29(9):1436-1450. PubMed ID: 29953332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Allocation of Study Time in Chinese Junior School Students: Habitual Responding, Item Difficulty, and Time Constraints.
    Wang F; Qin Q; Jiang Y
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():639. PubMed ID: 27199865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Individual differences in relational reasoning.
    Gray ME; Holyoak KJ
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Jan; 48(1):96-110. PubMed ID: 31317394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The separate roles of the reflective mind and involuntary inhibitory control in gatekeeping paranormal beliefs and the underlying intuitive confusions.
    Svedholm AM; Lindeman M
    Br J Psychol; 2013 Aug; 104(3):303-19. PubMed ID: 23848383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of introspection on judgment and decision making is dependent on the quality of conscious thinking.
    Leisti T; Häkkinen J
    Conscious Cogn; 2016 May; 42():340-351. PubMed ID: 27131852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of Physicians' Cognitive Styles.
    Djulbegovic B; Beckstead JW; Elqayam S; Reljic T; Hozo I; Kumar A; Cannon-Bowers J; Taylor S; Tsalatsanis A; Turner B; Paidas C
    Med Decis Making; 2014 Jul; 34(5):627-37. PubMed ID: 24722474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Similarities and differences between mind-wandering and external distraction: a latent variable analysis of lapses of attention and their relation to cognitive abilities.
    Unsworth N; McMillan BD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():14-25. PubMed ID: 24793128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Individual differences in intuitive-experiential and analytical-rational thinking styles.
    Epstein S; Pacini R; Denes-Raj V; Heier H
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1996 Aug; 71(2):390-405. PubMed ID: 8765488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Is knowledge reliance in source guessing a cognitive trait? Examining stability across time and domain.
    Wulff L; Kuhlmann BG
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):256-276. PubMed ID: 31912426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Timing matters: negative emotion elicited 5 min but not 30 min or 45 min after learning enhances consolidation of internal-monitoring source memory.
    Wang B; Bukuan S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 May; 157():56-64. PubMed ID: 25725193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Understanding individual differences in representational abstraction: The role of working memory capacity.
    Stukken L; Van Rensbergen B; Vanpaemel W; Storms G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Oct; 170():94-102. PubMed ID: 27385470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reducing the item number to obtain same-length self-assessment scales: a systematic approach using result of graphical loglinear Rasch modeling.
    Nielsen T; Kreiner S
    J Appl Meas; 2011; 12(4):310-23. PubMed ID: 22357154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Individual differences in exploration and persistence: Grit and beliefs about ability and reward.
    Dale G; Sampers D; Loo S; Green CS
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0203131. PubMed ID: 30180200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Using future thinking to reduce temporal discounting: Under what circumstances are the medial temporal lobes critical?
    Palombo DJ; Keane MM; Verfaellie M
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Aug; 89():437-444. PubMed ID: 27384755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Systems 1 and 2 thinking processes and cognitive reflection testing in medical students.
    Tay SW; Ryan P; Ryan CA
    Can Med Educ J; 2016 Oct; 7(2):e97-e103. PubMed ID: 28344696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Multiple choice questions can be designed or revised to challenge learners' critical thinking.
    Tractenberg RE; Gushta MM; Mulroney SE; Weissinger PA
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Dec; 18(5):945-61. PubMed ID: 23288470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The influence of time on task on mind wandering and visual working memory.
    Krimsky M; Forster DE; Llabre MM; Jha AP
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():84-90. PubMed ID: 28865286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.