These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26987560)

  • 41. Multiple choice questions can be designed or revised to challenge learners' critical thinking.
    Tractenberg RE; Gushta MM; Mulroney SE; Weissinger PA
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2013 Dec; 18(5):945-61. PubMed ID: 23288470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The influence of time on task on mind wandering and visual working memory.
    Krimsky M; Forster DE; Llabre MM; Jha AP
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():84-90. PubMed ID: 28865286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Recruitment of intuitive versus analytic thinking strategies affects the role of working memory in a gambling task.
    Gozzi M; Cherubini P; Papagno C; Bricolo E
    Psychol Res; 2011 May; 75(3):188-201. PubMed ID: 20697767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Working memory training is associated with lower prefrontal cortex activation in a divergent thinking task.
    Vartanian O; Jobidon ME; Bouak F; Nakashima A; Smith I; Lam Q; Cheung B
    Neuroscience; 2013 Apr; 236():186-94. PubMed ID: 23357116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Not all great minds think alike: systematic and intuitive cognitive styles.
    Sagiv L; Amit A; Ein-Gar D; Arieli S
    J Pers; 2014 Oct; 82(5):402-17. PubMed ID: 24007535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Paranormal psychic believers and skeptics: a large-scale test of the cognitive differences hypothesis.
    Gray SJ; Gallo DA
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Feb; 44(2):242-61. PubMed ID: 26503412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Are learning approaches and thinking styles related? A study in two Chinese populations.
    Zhang LF; Sternberg RJ
    J Psychol; 2000 Sep; 134(5):469-89. PubMed ID: 11034129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Ecological rationality or nested sets? Individual differences in cognitive processing predict Bayesian reasoning.
    Sirota M; Juanchich M; Hagmayer Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2014 Feb; 21(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 23794254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Nosce te ipsum--Socrates revisited? Controlling momentary ruminative self-referent thoughts by neuromodulation of emotional working memory.
    Vanderhasselt MA; Brunoni AR; Loeys T; Boggio PS; De Raedt R
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Nov; 51(13):2581-9. PubMed ID: 23999404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Eye Movement Patterns Characteristic of Cognitive Style.
    Nitzan-Tamar O; Kramarski B; Vakil E
    Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 63(3):159-68. PubMed ID: 27404984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Focused, unfocused, and defocused information in working memory.
    Rerko L; Oberauer K
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jul; 39(4):1075-96. PubMed ID: 23421511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Investigating the Robustness of the Illusory Truth Effect Across Individual Differences in Cognitive Ability, Need for Cognitive Closure, and Cognitive Style.
    De Keersmaecker J; Dunning D; Pennycook G; Rand DG; Sanchez C; Unkelbach C; Roets A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2020 Feb; 46(2):204-215. PubMed ID: 31179863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot.
    Adam KCS; Vogel EK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Jul; 79(5):1506-1523. PubMed ID: 28470554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The scope and control of attention: Sources of variance in working memory capacity.
    Chow M; Conway AR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Apr; 43(3):325-39. PubMed ID: 25604642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Working memory delay activity predicts individual differences in cognitive abilities.
    Unsworth N; Fukuda K; Awh E; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 May; 27(5):853-65. PubMed ID: 25436671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Deconstructing Planning Ability in Children and Adolescents with Anorexia Nervosa.
    Rose M; Reville MC; Iszatt A; Levinson S; Frampton I; Lask B
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2017; 6(4):297-304. PubMed ID: 27183392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The importance of arousal for variation in working memory capacity and attention control: A latent variable pupillometry study.
    Unsworth N; Robison MK
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1962-1987. PubMed ID: 28504528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Individual differences in working memory capacity and attentional control.
    Hiebel N; Zimmer HD
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2015 Mar; 69(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 25730638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Individual differences in thinking style and dealing with contradiction: The mediating role of mixed emotions.
    Santos D; Requero B; Martín-Fernández M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257864. PubMed ID: 34559841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Role of working memory, inhibition, and fluid intelligence in the performance of the Tower of London task.
    D'Antuono G; La Torre FR; Marin D; Antonucci G; Piccardi L; Guariglia C
    Appl Neuropsychol Adult; 2017; 24(6):548-558. PubMed ID: 27645626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.